利用在线和离线全球模式在不同水平分辨率下模拟Rn222的输运:与测量值的详细比较

IF 2.3 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
F. Dentener, J. Feichter, A. Jeuken
{"title":"利用在线和离线全球模式在不同水平分辨率下模拟Rn222的输运:与测量值的详细比较","authors":"F. Dentener, J. Feichter, A. Jeuken","doi":"10.3402/TELLUSB.V51I3.16440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The short-lived radionuclide Rn 222 is emitted at a fairly constant rate from the continents and is a good surrogate for studying the transport of “air pollution” from polluted continental areas to clean, remote regions. The large concentration gradients of 2–3 orders of magnitude which exist between the continents and the remote atmosphere present a major challenge to the modelling of horizontal and vertical atmospheric transport. We use the global off-line tracer transport model TM3 at 3 different resolutions. Input to the model consists of meteorological data for the year 1993 obtained from the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The same meteorological data is used to constrain the climate model ECHAM4-T42-L19. Using these meteorological data, Rn 222 simulations are used to evaluate and document model performance and associated uncertainties. High time-resolution measurements made at 2 continental stations, 2 stations under continental influence and 4 remote sites, and aircraft measurements obtained during the NARE aircraft campaign are used for a detailed comparison. Although in specific regions there are inter-model differences of up to a factor of 2 in the calculated boundary layer concentrations, these differences are not translated into a better performance of either model for the stations used for comparison. We generally obtain high correlations of model results and measurements; these range from  r = 0.6–0.8 for the continental and coastal stations and 0.5–0.6 for the remote sites. Calculated mean concentrations and corresponding standard deviations generally agree favourably with observations, lending credibility to the usefulness of our models for evaluating transport of air pollutants from continental sources to remote regions. The main cause of model deviations is probably related to uncertainties in the meteorological input data set provided by the ECMWF model and to a lesser extent by our knowledge of the spatial distribution of Rn 222 emissions and uncertainties involving sub-grid scale parameterization of vertical transport, e.g., diffusion and convection. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.t01-2-00001.x","PeriodicalId":54432,"journal":{"name":"Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology","volume":"60 1","pages":"573-602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"137","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation of the transport of Rn222 using on‐line and off‐line global models at different horizontal resolutions: a detailed comparison with measurements,\",\"authors\":\"F. Dentener, J. Feichter, A. Jeuken\",\"doi\":\"10.3402/TELLUSB.V51I3.16440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The short-lived radionuclide Rn 222 is emitted at a fairly constant rate from the continents and is a good surrogate for studying the transport of “air pollution” from polluted continental areas to clean, remote regions. The large concentration gradients of 2–3 orders of magnitude which exist between the continents and the remote atmosphere present a major challenge to the modelling of horizontal and vertical atmospheric transport. We use the global off-line tracer transport model TM3 at 3 different resolutions. Input to the model consists of meteorological data for the year 1993 obtained from the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The same meteorological data is used to constrain the climate model ECHAM4-T42-L19. Using these meteorological data, Rn 222 simulations are used to evaluate and document model performance and associated uncertainties. High time-resolution measurements made at 2 continental stations, 2 stations under continental influence and 4 remote sites, and aircraft measurements obtained during the NARE aircraft campaign are used for a detailed comparison. Although in specific regions there are inter-model differences of up to a factor of 2 in the calculated boundary layer concentrations, these differences are not translated into a better performance of either model for the stations used for comparison. We generally obtain high correlations of model results and measurements; these range from  r = 0.6–0.8 for the continental and coastal stations and 0.5–0.6 for the remote sites. Calculated mean concentrations and corresponding standard deviations generally agree favourably with observations, lending credibility to the usefulness of our models for evaluating transport of air pollutants from continental sources to remote regions. The main cause of model deviations is probably related to uncertainties in the meteorological input data set provided by the ECMWF model and to a lesser extent by our knowledge of the spatial distribution of Rn 222 emissions and uncertainties involving sub-grid scale parameterization of vertical transport, e.g., diffusion and convection. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.t01-2-00001.x\",\"PeriodicalId\":54432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"573-602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"137\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3402/TELLUSB.V51I3.16440\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/TELLUSB.V51I3.16440","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 137

摘要

短寿命放射性核素Rn 222从大陆以相当恒定的速率发射,是研究“空气污染”从受污染的大陆地区向干净的偏远地区转移的良好替代物。大陆和遥远大气之间存在的2-3个数量级的大浓度梯度对水平和垂直大气输送的模拟提出了重大挑战。我们使用3种不同分辨率的全球离线示踪剂传输模型TM3。该模式的输入包括从欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)获得的1993年气象数据。同样的气象资料被用来约束气候模式ECHAM4-T42-L19。利用这些气象数据,r222模拟用于评估和记录模式的性能和相关的不确定性。在2个大陆台站、2个受大陆影响的台站和4个偏远站点进行的高时间分辨率测量,以及在NARE飞机运动期间获得的飞机测量,用于详细比较。虽然在特定区域,计算出的边界层浓度在模式间存在高达2倍的差异,但这些差异并没有转化为用于比较的台站的任何一种模式的更好性能。我们通常得到模型结果和测量值的高度相关性;大陆和沿海站点的r = 0.6-0.8,偏远站点的r = 0.5-0.6。计算出的平均浓度和相应的标准偏差大体上与观测结果一致,这为我们的模型在评估空气污染物从大陆源向偏远地区的输送时的有效性提供了可信度。模式偏差的主要原因可能与ECMWF模式提供的气象输入数据集的不确定性有关,在较小程度上与我们对Rn 222排放空间分布的了解以及涉及垂直输送(如扩散和对流)亚网格尺度参数化的不确定性有关。DOI: 10.1034 / j.1600 0889.1999.t01 - 2 - 00001. x
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulation of the transport of Rn222 using on‐line and off‐line global models at different horizontal resolutions: a detailed comparison with measurements,
The short-lived radionuclide Rn 222 is emitted at a fairly constant rate from the continents and is a good surrogate for studying the transport of “air pollution” from polluted continental areas to clean, remote regions. The large concentration gradients of 2–3 orders of magnitude which exist between the continents and the remote atmosphere present a major challenge to the modelling of horizontal and vertical atmospheric transport. We use the global off-line tracer transport model TM3 at 3 different resolutions. Input to the model consists of meteorological data for the year 1993 obtained from the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The same meteorological data is used to constrain the climate model ECHAM4-T42-L19. Using these meteorological data, Rn 222 simulations are used to evaluate and document model performance and associated uncertainties. High time-resolution measurements made at 2 continental stations, 2 stations under continental influence and 4 remote sites, and aircraft measurements obtained during the NARE aircraft campaign are used for a detailed comparison. Although in specific regions there are inter-model differences of up to a factor of 2 in the calculated boundary layer concentrations, these differences are not translated into a better performance of either model for the stations used for comparison. We generally obtain high correlations of model results and measurements; these range from  r = 0.6–0.8 for the continental and coastal stations and 0.5–0.6 for the remote sites. Calculated mean concentrations and corresponding standard deviations generally agree favourably with observations, lending credibility to the usefulness of our models for evaluating transport of air pollutants from continental sources to remote regions. The main cause of model deviations is probably related to uncertainties in the meteorological input data set provided by the ECMWF model and to a lesser extent by our knowledge of the spatial distribution of Rn 222 emissions and uncertainties involving sub-grid scale parameterization of vertical transport, e.g., diffusion and convection. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.t01-2-00001.x
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology along with its sister journal Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, are the international, peer-reviewed journals of the International Meteorological Institute in Stockholm, an independent non-for-profit body integrated into the Department of Meteorology at the Faculty of Sciences of Stockholm University, Sweden. Aiming to promote the exchange of knowledge about meteorology from across a range of scientific sub-disciplines, the two journals serve an international community of researchers, policy makers, managers, media and the general public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信