{"title":"北美人对福柯的疯狂和疯狂的接受","authors":"A. Beaulieu","doi":"10.5840/symposium2022261/22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims at understanding the North-American reception of Foucault’s Folie et déraison. After showing how American concep-tions of social control facilitated the integration of Foucauldian thinking in North-American academia, I examine the ways by which the advocates of anti-psychiatry and the historians of psychiatry read Folie et déraison, which became emblematic for French Theory. I then present various Anglo-American critiques of Folie et déraison and defend the persistence of a “Foucauldian spirit” against the sci-entifization of psychiatry. All this allows for an assessment of the leg-acy of Folie et déraison in the North American debates.","PeriodicalId":34988,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La Réception nord-américaine de Folie et déraison de Foucault\",\"authors\":\"A. Beaulieu\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/symposium2022261/22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims at understanding the North-American reception of Foucault’s Folie et déraison. After showing how American concep-tions of social control facilitated the integration of Foucauldian thinking in North-American academia, I examine the ways by which the advocates of anti-psychiatry and the historians of psychiatry read Folie et déraison, which became emblematic for French Theory. I then present various Anglo-American critiques of Folie et déraison and defend the persistence of a “Foucauldian spirit” against the sci-entifization of psychiatry. All this allows for an assessment of the leg-acy of Folie et déraison in the North American debates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/symposium2022261/22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/symposium2022261/22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文旨在了解北美对福柯《自由与自由》的接受情况。在展示了美国的社会控制概念如何促进了福柯思想在北美学术界的整合之后,我考察了反精神病学的倡导者和精神病学的历史学家们阅读Folie et d理性理论(Folie et d理性理论)的方式,后者已成为法国理论的象征。然后,我提出了各种英美对Folie et dsamdraison的批评,并捍卫“福柯精神”的持久性,反对精神病学的科学化。所有这些都使得我们可以对Folie et dsamreason在北美辩论中的遗留问题进行评估。
La Réception nord-américaine de Folie et déraison de Foucault
This article aims at understanding the North-American reception of Foucault’s Folie et déraison. After showing how American concep-tions of social control facilitated the integration of Foucauldian thinking in North-American academia, I examine the ways by which the advocates of anti-psychiatry and the historians of psychiatry read Folie et déraison, which became emblematic for French Theory. I then present various Anglo-American critiques of Folie et déraison and defend the persistence of a “Foucauldian spirit” against the sci-entifization of psychiatry. All this allows for an assessment of the leg-acy of Folie et déraison in the North American debates.