临床伦理实践的感知:来自VA医疗保健系统的综合伦理学员工调查数据

R. Pearlman, Jennifer Cohen, M. Bottrell, M. Foglia, E. Fox
{"title":"临床伦理实践的感知:来自VA医疗保健系统的综合伦理学员工调查数据","authors":"R. Pearlman, Jennifer Cohen, M. Bottrell, M. Foglia, E. Fox","doi":"10.1080/21507716.2012.752418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical ethics is fundamental to the quality of health care and is a concern facing all health care systems. This study examined clinicians’ perceptions of ethical practices in shared decision making with patients, end-of-life care, professionalism in patient care, and patient privacy and confidentiality in order to identify strengths in ethical practices and opportunities for improvement. Methods: We analyzed data from the 48,857 clinician respondents to the 2010 IntegratedEthics™ Staff Survey (IESS). The IESS was developed to provide a broad snapshot of a health care organization's ethical practices for quality improvement purposes. We used descriptive statistics to evaluate clinicians’ perceptions of clinical ethics practices and multivariate logistic regression analyses to evaluate associations between clinician- and organization-level characteristics and positive ethical practices. Results: Survey results suggest opportunities for improvement in ethical practices, including giving patients sufficient time to discuss treatment recommendations, giving better guidance to clinicians on how to maintain professional boundaries, disclosing medical errors to patients and surrogates, and providing clinicians with better education about ethical issues in end-of-life care. The majority of respondents were familiar with the ethics consultation service (ECS). Familiarity with the ECS was significantly associated with length of time working at VA, physician status, and manager/supervisory level of responsibility. If confronted with an ethical concern, approximately three-quarters of respondents reported that they would be very or moderately likely to use the ECS. Conclusions: The results from this study support quality improvement activities by allowing health care organizations to compare clinical ethics practices across staff groups, settings, and time. After a facility obtains its results, the next steps should include seeking greater understanding through qualitative interviews, and then selecting topics for quality improvement initiatives. These activities will reinforce the importance of ethics as a component of health care quality and promote a positive ethics environment.","PeriodicalId":89316,"journal":{"name":"AJOB primary research","volume":"27 1","pages":"20 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of Clinical Ethics Practices: IntegratedEthicsTM Staff Survey Data from the VA Health Care System\",\"authors\":\"R. Pearlman, Jennifer Cohen, M. Bottrell, M. Foglia, E. Fox\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21507716.2012.752418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Clinical ethics is fundamental to the quality of health care and is a concern facing all health care systems. This study examined clinicians’ perceptions of ethical practices in shared decision making with patients, end-of-life care, professionalism in patient care, and patient privacy and confidentiality in order to identify strengths in ethical practices and opportunities for improvement. Methods: We analyzed data from the 48,857 clinician respondents to the 2010 IntegratedEthics™ Staff Survey (IESS). The IESS was developed to provide a broad snapshot of a health care organization's ethical practices for quality improvement purposes. We used descriptive statistics to evaluate clinicians’ perceptions of clinical ethics practices and multivariate logistic regression analyses to evaluate associations between clinician- and organization-level characteristics and positive ethical practices. Results: Survey results suggest opportunities for improvement in ethical practices, including giving patients sufficient time to discuss treatment recommendations, giving better guidance to clinicians on how to maintain professional boundaries, disclosing medical errors to patients and surrogates, and providing clinicians with better education about ethical issues in end-of-life care. The majority of respondents were familiar with the ethics consultation service (ECS). Familiarity with the ECS was significantly associated with length of time working at VA, physician status, and manager/supervisory level of responsibility. If confronted with an ethical concern, approximately three-quarters of respondents reported that they would be very or moderately likely to use the ECS. Conclusions: The results from this study support quality improvement activities by allowing health care organizations to compare clinical ethics practices across staff groups, settings, and time. After a facility obtains its results, the next steps should include seeking greater understanding through qualitative interviews, and then selecting topics for quality improvement initiatives. These activities will reinforce the importance of ethics as a component of health care quality and promote a positive ethics environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOB primary research\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"20 - 33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOB primary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2012.752418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB primary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2012.752418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:临床伦理是卫生保健质量的基础,是所有卫生保健系统面临的问题。本研究考察了临床医生在与患者共同决策、临终关怀、患者护理专业、患者隐私和保密等方面对道德实践的看法,以确定道德实践的优势和改进的机会。方法:我们分析了2010年integrate伦理学员工调查(IESS)中48,857名临床医生的数据。制定道德标准是为了提供卫生保健组织道德实践的概貌,以提高质量。我们使用描述性统计来评估临床医生对临床伦理实践的看法,并使用多变量逻辑回归分析来评估临床医生和组织层面特征与积极伦理实践之间的关系。结果:调查结果表明,伦理实践有改进的机会,包括给患者足够的时间讨论治疗建议,更好地指导临床医生如何保持专业界限,向患者和代理人披露医疗错误,并为临床医生提供更好的关于临终关怀伦理问题的教育。大多数受访者都熟悉道德谘询服务。对ECS的熟悉程度与在VA工作的时间长短、医生身份和经理/监督职责水平显著相关。如果面临道德问题,大约四分之三的受访者报告说,他们将非常或中等可能使用ECS。结论:本研究的结果通过允许卫生保健组织比较不同工作人员群体、环境和时间的临床伦理实践来支持质量改进活动。在机构获得结果之后,下一步应该包括通过定性访谈寻求更大的理解,然后为质量改进计划选择主题。这些活动将加强道德作为保健质量组成部分的重要性,并促进积极的道德环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of Clinical Ethics Practices: IntegratedEthicsTM Staff Survey Data from the VA Health Care System
Background: Clinical ethics is fundamental to the quality of health care and is a concern facing all health care systems. This study examined clinicians’ perceptions of ethical practices in shared decision making with patients, end-of-life care, professionalism in patient care, and patient privacy and confidentiality in order to identify strengths in ethical practices and opportunities for improvement. Methods: We analyzed data from the 48,857 clinician respondents to the 2010 IntegratedEthics™ Staff Survey (IESS). The IESS was developed to provide a broad snapshot of a health care organization's ethical practices for quality improvement purposes. We used descriptive statistics to evaluate clinicians’ perceptions of clinical ethics practices and multivariate logistic regression analyses to evaluate associations between clinician- and organization-level characteristics and positive ethical practices. Results: Survey results suggest opportunities for improvement in ethical practices, including giving patients sufficient time to discuss treatment recommendations, giving better guidance to clinicians on how to maintain professional boundaries, disclosing medical errors to patients and surrogates, and providing clinicians with better education about ethical issues in end-of-life care. The majority of respondents were familiar with the ethics consultation service (ECS). Familiarity with the ECS was significantly associated with length of time working at VA, physician status, and manager/supervisory level of responsibility. If confronted with an ethical concern, approximately three-quarters of respondents reported that they would be very or moderately likely to use the ECS. Conclusions: The results from this study support quality improvement activities by allowing health care organizations to compare clinical ethics practices across staff groups, settings, and time. After a facility obtains its results, the next steps should include seeking greater understanding through qualitative interviews, and then selecting topics for quality improvement initiatives. These activities will reinforce the importance of ethics as a component of health care quality and promote a positive ethics environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信