买不买,等不买:降价下顾客后悔的实证研究及其对零售业的启示

Ö. Özer, In-hyo Sul, A. S. Şimşek
{"title":"买不买,等不买:降价下顾客后悔的实证研究及其对零售业的启示","authors":"Ö. Özer, In-hyo Sul, A. S. Şimşek","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3729497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study and quantify how much, in a markdown pricing situation, customers anticipate regret of paying a high price during the regular season or facing the possibility of a stockout during markdown season. In addition, we provide a framework to quantify the impact of customer regret on retailer’s optimal markdown pricing strategy and resulting revenues across various product categories. We model a regret-prone customer’s purchase decision using a utility based economic model, and estimate the parameters of this model with data obtained from the online channel of a luxury fashion retailer. We consider two types of anticipated regret, which are both incurred when a customer engages in counterfactual thinking at the beginning of a product’s selling season. If customers buy the product at a regular price, they anticipate high-price regret and hence incur the mental cost of knowing that the product may be available later at a discounted price. However, if customers wait for the discounted price, they anticipate stockout regret and hence incur the mental cost of possibly facing a stockout during the markdown season. We show that retailers only need to know the ratio between the two types of anticipated regret to account for their impact on customer purchase decisions and optimize pricing decisions accordingly. We develop an empirical strategy to jointly estimate this regret ratio and customers’ reservation price distribution parameters for each product. We find significant heterogeneity in regret characteristics across product categories. We show that stockout regret generally dominates high-price regret in magnitude. This dominance is even stronger for products that attract more high-spending customers and/or more frequent website visitors. Our counterfactual analysis shows that the luxury fashion retailer could have increased its revenues by up to 11.64% if it were to account for the anticipated customer regret in its pricing strategy. We also propose a method to disentangle the high-price and stockout regrets from the estimated regret ratio and show, for example, that stockout regret in a womenswear category is significantly larger than that of a similar menswear category.","PeriodicalId":82888,"journal":{"name":"Technology (Elmsford, N.Y.)","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Damned if You Buy, Damned if You Wait: An Empirical Investigation of Customer Regret Under Markdown Pricing and Its Implications to Retailing\",\"authors\":\"Ö. Özer, In-hyo Sul, A. S. Şimşek\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3729497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study and quantify how much, in a markdown pricing situation, customers anticipate regret of paying a high price during the regular season or facing the possibility of a stockout during markdown season. In addition, we provide a framework to quantify the impact of customer regret on retailer’s optimal markdown pricing strategy and resulting revenues across various product categories. We model a regret-prone customer’s purchase decision using a utility based economic model, and estimate the parameters of this model with data obtained from the online channel of a luxury fashion retailer. We consider two types of anticipated regret, which are both incurred when a customer engages in counterfactual thinking at the beginning of a product’s selling season. If customers buy the product at a regular price, they anticipate high-price regret and hence incur the mental cost of knowing that the product may be available later at a discounted price. However, if customers wait for the discounted price, they anticipate stockout regret and hence incur the mental cost of possibly facing a stockout during the markdown season. We show that retailers only need to know the ratio between the two types of anticipated regret to account for their impact on customer purchase decisions and optimize pricing decisions accordingly. We develop an empirical strategy to jointly estimate this regret ratio and customers’ reservation price distribution parameters for each product. We find significant heterogeneity in regret characteristics across product categories. We show that stockout regret generally dominates high-price regret in magnitude. This dominance is even stronger for products that attract more high-spending customers and/or more frequent website visitors. Our counterfactual analysis shows that the luxury fashion retailer could have increased its revenues by up to 11.64% if it were to account for the anticipated customer regret in its pricing strategy. We also propose a method to disentangle the high-price and stockout regrets from the estimated regret ratio and show, for example, that stockout regret in a womenswear category is significantly larger than that of a similar menswear category.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology (Elmsford, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology (Elmsford, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3729497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology (Elmsford, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3729497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们研究并量化了在降价的情况下,消费者对在常规季节支付高价或在降价季节面临缺货的可能性的后悔程度。此外,我们还提供了一个框架来量化顾客后悔对零售商的最佳降价定价策略和各种产品类别的最终收入的影响。我们使用基于效用的经济模型对一个有后悔倾向的顾客的购买决策进行建模,并使用从奢侈品时尚零售商的在线渠道获得的数据估计该模型的参数。我们考虑了两种类型的预期后悔,当客户在产品销售季节开始时从事反事实思维时,这两种后悔都会发生。如果顾客以正常价格购买产品,他们预期高价后会后悔,因此会产生一种心理成本,即知道该产品以后可能会以折扣价出售。然而,如果消费者等待折扣价格,他们预计会后悔缺货,因此在降价季节可能会面临缺货的心理成本。我们表明,零售商只需要知道两种类型的预期后悔之间的比率,就可以解释它们对客户购买决策的影响,并相应地优化定价决策。我们开发了一种经验策略来联合估计每种产品的后悔率和客户保留价格分布参数。我们发现后悔的特征在不同的产品类别中具有显著的异质性。我们发现,缺货后悔通常在程度上优于高价后悔。对于那些吸引更多高消费客户和/或更频繁的网站访问者的产品,这种主导地位甚至更强。我们的反事实分析表明,如果在定价策略中考虑到预期的顾客后悔,这家奢侈品时尚零售商的收入可能会增加11.64%。我们还提出了一种方法,将高价后悔和缺货后悔从估计的后悔比率中分离出来,并显示,例如,女装类别的缺货后悔明显大于类似男装类别的缺货后悔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Damned if You Buy, Damned if You Wait: An Empirical Investigation of Customer Regret Under Markdown Pricing and Its Implications to Retailing
We study and quantify how much, in a markdown pricing situation, customers anticipate regret of paying a high price during the regular season or facing the possibility of a stockout during markdown season. In addition, we provide a framework to quantify the impact of customer regret on retailer’s optimal markdown pricing strategy and resulting revenues across various product categories. We model a regret-prone customer’s purchase decision using a utility based economic model, and estimate the parameters of this model with data obtained from the online channel of a luxury fashion retailer. We consider two types of anticipated regret, which are both incurred when a customer engages in counterfactual thinking at the beginning of a product’s selling season. If customers buy the product at a regular price, they anticipate high-price regret and hence incur the mental cost of knowing that the product may be available later at a discounted price. However, if customers wait for the discounted price, they anticipate stockout regret and hence incur the mental cost of possibly facing a stockout during the markdown season. We show that retailers only need to know the ratio between the two types of anticipated regret to account for their impact on customer purchase decisions and optimize pricing decisions accordingly. We develop an empirical strategy to jointly estimate this regret ratio and customers’ reservation price distribution parameters for each product. We find significant heterogeneity in regret characteristics across product categories. We show that stockout regret generally dominates high-price regret in magnitude. This dominance is even stronger for products that attract more high-spending customers and/or more frequent website visitors. Our counterfactual analysis shows that the luxury fashion retailer could have increased its revenues by up to 11.64% if it were to account for the anticipated customer regret in its pricing strategy. We also propose a method to disentangle the high-price and stockout regrets from the estimated regret ratio and show, for example, that stockout regret in a womenswear category is significantly larger than that of a similar menswear category.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信