地方政府为何将公共服务外部化?佛兰德地区养老行业公司化、公私合作与PPP驱动因素实证分析

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
David Vos, Joris Voets
{"title":"地方政府为何将公共服务外部化?佛兰德地区养老行业公司化、公私合作与PPP驱动因素实证分析","authors":"David Vos, Joris Voets","doi":"10.4335/20.1.215-237(2022)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a study of 22 Flemish local governments and their respective delivery of elderly care, this article analyses the drivers of three local public service delivery externalisation options: corporatisation, public-public collaboration and public-private partnerships (PPP). The analysis reveals a combination of financial and economic efficiency underlying externalisation. Further, while political ideology appears to impact the choice for PPP, the findings suggest that externalisation is guided by pragmatic rather than political-ideological motivations. Overall, the results show that smaller and more financially strapped local governments are more inclined to choose for public-public collaboration and PPP. Rather than the overall financial situation of local governments being a underlying factor, the (potential) impact of the service-related costs on local finances drive externalisation. We also find that policymakers do not solely motivate their choices based on past and current situations, but also anticipate future challenges.","PeriodicalId":51875,"journal":{"name":"Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why do Local Governments Externalise Public Service Delivery? An Empirical Analysis of the Drivers of Corporatisation, Public-public Collaboration and PPP in the Flemish Elderly Care Sector\",\"authors\":\"David Vos, Joris Voets\",\"doi\":\"10.4335/20.1.215-237(2022)\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on a study of 22 Flemish local governments and their respective delivery of elderly care, this article analyses the drivers of three local public service delivery externalisation options: corporatisation, public-public collaboration and public-private partnerships (PPP). The analysis reveals a combination of financial and economic efficiency underlying externalisation. Further, while political ideology appears to impact the choice for PPP, the findings suggest that externalisation is guided by pragmatic rather than political-ideological motivations. Overall, the results show that smaller and more financially strapped local governments are more inclined to choose for public-public collaboration and PPP. Rather than the overall financial situation of local governments being a underlying factor, the (potential) impact of the service-related costs on local finances drive externalisation. We also find that policymakers do not solely motivate their choices based on past and current situations, but also anticipate future challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4335/20.1.215-237(2022)\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4335/20.1.215-237(2022)","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

基于对22个佛兰德地方政府及其各自提供的养老服务的研究,本文分析了三种地方公共服务提供外部化选择的驱动因素:公司化、公私合作和公私伙伴关系(PPP)。分析揭示了潜藏在外部化背后的金融和经济效率的结合。此外,虽然政治意识形态似乎影响购买力平价的选择,但研究结果表明,外部化是由实用主义而非政治意识形态动机引导的。总体而言,研究结果表明,规模较小、财政状况较差的地方政府更倾向于选择公私合作和PPP模式。服务相关成本对地方财政的(潜在)影响推动了外部化,而不是地方政府的整体财政状况。我们还发现,决策者不仅会根据过去和当前的情况来激励他们的选择,而且还会预测未来的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why do Local Governments Externalise Public Service Delivery? An Empirical Analysis of the Drivers of Corporatisation, Public-public Collaboration and PPP in the Flemish Elderly Care Sector
Based on a study of 22 Flemish local governments and their respective delivery of elderly care, this article analyses the drivers of three local public service delivery externalisation options: corporatisation, public-public collaboration and public-private partnerships (PPP). The analysis reveals a combination of financial and economic efficiency underlying externalisation. Further, while political ideology appears to impact the choice for PPP, the findings suggest that externalisation is guided by pragmatic rather than political-ideological motivations. Overall, the results show that smaller and more financially strapped local governments are more inclined to choose for public-public collaboration and PPP. Rather than the overall financial situation of local governments being a underlying factor, the (potential) impact of the service-related costs on local finances drive externalisation. We also find that policymakers do not solely motivate their choices based on past and current situations, but also anticipate future challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
25.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信