重构性质、地点和犯罪范式:探索时空制度变迁

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
J. Delisle, T. Grissom, Brent Never
{"title":"重构性质、地点和犯罪范式:探索时空制度变迁","authors":"J. Delisle, T. Grissom, Brent Never","doi":"10.1108/jerer-12-2019-0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to explore spatiotemporal factors that affect the empirical analysis of whether crime rates in buffer areas surrounding abandoned properties transferred to a Land Bank that differed among three regimes: before transfer, during Land Bank stewardship and after disposition and whether those differences were associated with differences in relative crime activity in the neighborhoods in which they were located.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study analyzed crime incidents occurring between 2010 and 2018 in 0.1-mile buffer areas surrounding 31 abandoned properties sold by the Land Bank and their neighborhoods in which those properties were located. Using Copulas, researchers compared concordance/discordance in the buffer areas across the three regime states for each property and approximately matched time periods for associated neighborhoods.\n\n\nFindings\nIn a substantial number of cases, the relative crime activity levels for buffer areas surrounding individual sold properties as measured by the Copulas shifted from concordant to discordant states and vice versa. Similarly, relative crime activity levels for neighborhoods shifted from concordant to discordant states across three matched regimes. In some cases, the property and neighborhood states matched, while in other cases they diverged. These cross-level interactions indicate that criminal behavioral patterns and target selection change over time and relative criminal activity. The introduction of Copulas can improve the reliability of such models over time and when and where they should be customized to add more granular insights needed by law enforcement agencies.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe introduction of Copulas can improve the spatiotemporal reliability of the analysis of criminal activity over space and time.\n\n\nPractical implications\nSpatiotemporal considerations should be incorporated in setting interventions to manage criminal activity.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis study provides support for policies supporting renovation of abandoned properties.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of authors’ knowledge, this research is the first application of Copulas to crime impact studies. As noted, Copulas can help reduce the risk of applying intervention or enforcement programs that are no longer reliable or lack the precision provided by insights into convergent/divergent patterns of criminal activity.\n","PeriodicalId":44570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Real Estate Research","volume":"296 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reframing the properties, places and crime paradigm: exploring spatiotemporal regime shifts\",\"authors\":\"J. Delisle, T. Grissom, Brent Never\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jerer-12-2019-0059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this study is to explore spatiotemporal factors that affect the empirical analysis of whether crime rates in buffer areas surrounding abandoned properties transferred to a Land Bank that differed among three regimes: before transfer, during Land Bank stewardship and after disposition and whether those differences were associated with differences in relative crime activity in the neighborhoods in which they were located.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study analyzed crime incidents occurring between 2010 and 2018 in 0.1-mile buffer areas surrounding 31 abandoned properties sold by the Land Bank and their neighborhoods in which those properties were located. Using Copulas, researchers compared concordance/discordance in the buffer areas across the three regime states for each property and approximately matched time periods for associated neighborhoods.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nIn a substantial number of cases, the relative crime activity levels for buffer areas surrounding individual sold properties as measured by the Copulas shifted from concordant to discordant states and vice versa. Similarly, relative crime activity levels for neighborhoods shifted from concordant to discordant states across three matched regimes. In some cases, the property and neighborhood states matched, while in other cases they diverged. These cross-level interactions indicate that criminal behavioral patterns and target selection change over time and relative criminal activity. The introduction of Copulas can improve the reliability of such models over time and when and where they should be customized to add more granular insights needed by law enforcement agencies.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe introduction of Copulas can improve the spatiotemporal reliability of the analysis of criminal activity over space and time.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nSpatiotemporal considerations should be incorporated in setting interventions to manage criminal activity.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThis study provides support for policies supporting renovation of abandoned properties.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of authors’ knowledge, this research is the first application of Copulas to crime impact studies. As noted, Copulas can help reduce the risk of applying intervention or enforcement programs that are no longer reliable or lack the precision provided by insights into convergent/divergent patterns of criminal activity.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Real Estate Research\",\"volume\":\"296 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Real Estate Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jerer-12-2019-0059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Real Estate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jerer-12-2019-0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨影响废弃物业周边缓冲地带的犯罪率是否在土地银行转让前、土地银行管理期间和处置后三种不同制度下转移到土地银行的时空因素,以及这些差异是否与他们所在社区的相对犯罪活动差异有关。设计/方法/方法本研究分析了2010年至2018年间发生在土地银行出售的31处废弃房产及其所在社区周围0.1英里缓冲区内的犯罪事件。使用copula,研究人员比较了缓冲区中每个属性的三种制度状态的一致性/不一致性,以及相关社区的近似匹配时间段。在相当数量的案例中,copula测量的个人出售房产周围缓冲区域的相对犯罪活动水平从和谐状态转变为不和谐状态,反之亦然。同样,在三个匹配的政权中,社区的相对犯罪活动水平从和谐状态转变为不和谐状态。在某些情况下,产权国和邻国是一致的,而在另一些情况下,它们是不一致的。这些跨层次的相互作用表明,犯罪行为模式和目标选择随着时间和相对犯罪活动的变化而变化。随着时间的推移,copula的引入可以提高这些模型的可靠性,并且可以在何时何地对它们进行定制,以增加执法机构所需的更细粒度的见解。研究局限/启示copula的引入可以提高犯罪活动在空间和时间上分析的时空可靠性。实际影响在制定管理犯罪活动的干预措施时应考虑到时空因素。社会意义本研究为支持废弃物业翻新的政策提供支持。原创性/价值据作者所知,本研究是copula在犯罪影响研究中的首次应用。如前所述,copula可以帮助降低应用干预或执法项目的风险,这些项目不再可靠,或者缺乏对犯罪活动趋同/发散模式的洞察力所提供的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reframing the properties, places and crime paradigm: exploring spatiotemporal regime shifts
Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore spatiotemporal factors that affect the empirical analysis of whether crime rates in buffer areas surrounding abandoned properties transferred to a Land Bank that differed among three regimes: before transfer, during Land Bank stewardship and after disposition and whether those differences were associated with differences in relative crime activity in the neighborhoods in which they were located. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzed crime incidents occurring between 2010 and 2018 in 0.1-mile buffer areas surrounding 31 abandoned properties sold by the Land Bank and their neighborhoods in which those properties were located. Using Copulas, researchers compared concordance/discordance in the buffer areas across the three regime states for each property and approximately matched time periods for associated neighborhoods. Findings In a substantial number of cases, the relative crime activity levels for buffer areas surrounding individual sold properties as measured by the Copulas shifted from concordant to discordant states and vice versa. Similarly, relative crime activity levels for neighborhoods shifted from concordant to discordant states across three matched regimes. In some cases, the property and neighborhood states matched, while in other cases they diverged. These cross-level interactions indicate that criminal behavioral patterns and target selection change over time and relative criminal activity. The introduction of Copulas can improve the reliability of such models over time and when and where they should be customized to add more granular insights needed by law enforcement agencies. Research limitations/implications The introduction of Copulas can improve the spatiotemporal reliability of the analysis of criminal activity over space and time. Practical implications Spatiotemporal considerations should be incorporated in setting interventions to manage criminal activity. Social implications This study provides support for policies supporting renovation of abandoned properties. Originality/value To the best of authors’ knowledge, this research is the first application of Copulas to crime impact studies. As noted, Copulas can help reduce the risk of applying intervention or enforcement programs that are no longer reliable or lack the precision provided by insights into convergent/divergent patterns of criminal activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信