在学术目的会话评价中,阅读综合课题回答的谈话特性——以阅读资料的使用为中心——

이승원, 조수진, 홍은실, 이성준, 오예림, 민병곤
{"title":"在学术目的会话评价中,阅读综合课题回答的谈话特性——以阅读资料的使用为中心——","authors":"이승원, 조수진, 홍은실, 이성준, 오예림, 민병곤","doi":"10.18625/jsc.2019..44.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to qualitatively analyze the responses to the integrated tasks for the Korean Speaking Test for Academic Purposes (KoSTAP), to discover the types and the usage of reading stimulus and to examine the discourse characteristics according to the test takers’ scores. It was known that the stimulus necessary for constructing the integrated speaking tasks have a certain influence on the performance of the task. This study was conducted by conducting a discourse analysis of the task takers’ performance in integrated reading-speaking tasks collected through the KoSTAP. The use of reading stimulus was categorized into “reproduction“ and “creation“. Four subtypes of “reproduction“ and five subtypes of “creation“ were also identified.","PeriodicalId":83500,"journal":{"name":"Western journal of speech communication : WJSC","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"학문 목적 말하기 평가에서 읽기 통합형 과제 응답의 담화적 특성 -읽기 자료 사용을 중심으로-\",\"authors\":\"이승원, 조수진, 홍은실, 이성준, 오예림, 민병곤\",\"doi\":\"10.18625/jsc.2019..44.81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to qualitatively analyze the responses to the integrated tasks for the Korean Speaking Test for Academic Purposes (KoSTAP), to discover the types and the usage of reading stimulus and to examine the discourse characteristics according to the test takers’ scores. It was known that the stimulus necessary for constructing the integrated speaking tasks have a certain influence on the performance of the task. This study was conducted by conducting a discourse analysis of the task takers’ performance in integrated reading-speaking tasks collected through the KoSTAP. The use of reading stimulus was categorized into “reproduction“ and “creation“. Four subtypes of “reproduction“ and five subtypes of “creation“ were also identified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western journal of speech communication : WJSC\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western journal of speech communication : WJSC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18625/jsc.2019..44.81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western journal of speech communication : WJSC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18625/jsc.2019..44.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在定性分析学生对学术韩语口语测试(KoSTAP)综合任务的反应,发现阅读刺激的类型和使用,并根据考生的分数检验话语特征。我们已经知道,构建综合口语任务所需的刺激对任务的执行有一定的影响。本研究通过对通过KoSTAP收集的阅读-口语综合任务中任务接受者的表现进行语篇分析。阅读刺激的使用分为“再生性”和“创造性”。“复制”的四种亚型和“创造”的五种亚型也被确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
학문 목적 말하기 평가에서 읽기 통합형 과제 응답의 담화적 특성 -읽기 자료 사용을 중심으로-
This study aimed to qualitatively analyze the responses to the integrated tasks for the Korean Speaking Test for Academic Purposes (KoSTAP), to discover the types and the usage of reading stimulus and to examine the discourse characteristics according to the test takers’ scores. It was known that the stimulus necessary for constructing the integrated speaking tasks have a certain influence on the performance of the task. This study was conducted by conducting a discourse analysis of the task takers’ performance in integrated reading-speaking tasks collected through the KoSTAP. The use of reading stimulus was categorized into “reproduction“ and “creation“. Four subtypes of “reproduction“ and five subtypes of “creation“ were also identified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信