可读性索引并不能说明文本可读性的全部

E. Matricciani
{"title":"可读性索引并不能说明文本可读性的全部","authors":"E. Matricciani","doi":"10.3390/analytics2020016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a universal readability index, GU, applicable to any alphabetical language and related to cognitive psychology, the theory of communication, phonics and linguistics. This index also considers readers’ short-term-memory processing capacity, here modeled by the word interval IP, namely, the number of words between two interpunctions. Any current readability formula does not consider Ip, but scatterplots of Ip versus a readability index show that texts with the same readability index can have very different Ip, ranging from 4 to 9, practically Miller’s range, which refers to 95% of readers. It is unlikely that IP has no impact on reading difficulty. The examples shown are taken from Italian and English Literatures, and from the translations of The New Testament in Latin and in contemporary languages. We also propose an extremely compact formula, relating the capacity of human short-term memory to the difficulty of reading a text. It should synthetically model human reading difficulty, a kind of “footprint” of humans. However, further experimental and multidisciplinary work is necessary to confirm our conjecture about the dependence of a readability index on a reader’s short-term-memory capacity.","PeriodicalId":93078,"journal":{"name":"Big data analytics","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Readability Indices Do Not Say It All on a Text Readability\",\"authors\":\"E. Matricciani\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/analytics2020016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose a universal readability index, GU, applicable to any alphabetical language and related to cognitive psychology, the theory of communication, phonics and linguistics. This index also considers readers’ short-term-memory processing capacity, here modeled by the word interval IP, namely, the number of words between two interpunctions. Any current readability formula does not consider Ip, but scatterplots of Ip versus a readability index show that texts with the same readability index can have very different Ip, ranging from 4 to 9, practically Miller’s range, which refers to 95% of readers. It is unlikely that IP has no impact on reading difficulty. The examples shown are taken from Italian and English Literatures, and from the translations of The New Testament in Latin and in contemporary languages. We also propose an extremely compact formula, relating the capacity of human short-term memory to the difficulty of reading a text. It should synthetically model human reading difficulty, a kind of “footprint” of humans. However, further experimental and multidisciplinary work is necessary to confirm our conjecture about the dependence of a readability index on a reader’s short-term-memory capacity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Big data analytics\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Big data analytics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/analytics2020016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big data analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/analytics2020016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

我们提出了一个通用的可读性指数,GU,适用于任何字母语言,并涉及到认知心理学,传播学理论,语音和语言学。该指标还考虑了读者的短时记忆处理能力,这里用单词间隔IP来建模,即两个标点之间的单词数。目前的任何可读性公式都不考虑Ip,但Ip与可读性指数的散点图显示,具有相同可读性指数的文本可能具有非常不同的Ip,范围从4到9,实际上是米勒的范围,它指的是95%的读者。IP不太可能对阅读困难没有影响。所展示的例子取自意大利语和英语文学,以及新约的拉丁语和当代语言译本。我们还提出了一个非常紧凑的公式,将人类短期记忆的能力与阅读文本的难度联系起来。它应该综合模拟人类的阅读困难,这是人类的一种“足迹”。然而,进一步的实验和多学科的工作是必要的,以证实我们的猜测,可读性指数依赖于读者的短期记忆能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Readability Indices Do Not Say It All on a Text Readability
We propose a universal readability index, GU, applicable to any alphabetical language and related to cognitive psychology, the theory of communication, phonics and linguistics. This index also considers readers’ short-term-memory processing capacity, here modeled by the word interval IP, namely, the number of words between two interpunctions. Any current readability formula does not consider Ip, but scatterplots of Ip versus a readability index show that texts with the same readability index can have very different Ip, ranging from 4 to 9, practically Miller’s range, which refers to 95% of readers. It is unlikely that IP has no impact on reading difficulty. The examples shown are taken from Italian and English Literatures, and from the translations of The New Testament in Latin and in contemporary languages. We also propose an extremely compact formula, relating the capacity of human short-term memory to the difficulty of reading a text. It should synthetically model human reading difficulty, a kind of “footprint” of humans. However, further experimental and multidisciplinary work is necessary to confirm our conjecture about the dependence of a readability index on a reader’s short-term-memory capacity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信