当代年轻消费者决策风格的跨文化研究

IF 1.9 Q3 BUSINESS
Y. Ma, Kim H. Y. Hahn
{"title":"当代年轻消费者决策风格的跨文化研究","authors":"Y. Ma, Kim H. Y. Hahn","doi":"10.1080/17543266.2022.2095040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n This study addressed the cross-cultural applicability and tested the generalizability of the Consumer Styles Inventory (CSI) for profiling contemporary young consumers in the U.S. and South Korea. Online surveys were used to collect 411 American and 680 South Korean female responses from various universities in both countries, respectively. Using a cross-validation approach, this study revealed a seven-factor model for U.S. consumers and a five-factor model for South Korean consumers differed from the original Sproles and Kendall’s eight-factor model, suggesting a substantial modification to profile Decision-making Styles (DMS) of today’s global consumers. Findings are limited to young female consumers in both countries. The similarities and differences found between these two countries can provide helpful insights to apparel professionals targeting global consumers. The findings contribute a new way of profiling today’s young fashion consumers by modifying existing CSI that have been used for more than 30 years.","PeriodicalId":39443,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education","volume":"21 1","pages":"22 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Cultural study of decision-making styles for contemporary young consumers\",\"authors\":\"Y. Ma, Kim H. Y. Hahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17543266.2022.2095040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n This study addressed the cross-cultural applicability and tested the generalizability of the Consumer Styles Inventory (CSI) for profiling contemporary young consumers in the U.S. and South Korea. Online surveys were used to collect 411 American and 680 South Korean female responses from various universities in both countries, respectively. Using a cross-validation approach, this study revealed a seven-factor model for U.S. consumers and a five-factor model for South Korean consumers differed from the original Sproles and Kendall’s eight-factor model, suggesting a substantial modification to profile Decision-making Styles (DMS) of today’s global consumers. Findings are limited to young female consumers in both countries. The similarities and differences found between these two countries can provide helpful insights to apparel professionals targeting global consumers. The findings contribute a new way of profiling today’s young fashion consumers by modifying existing CSI that have been used for more than 30 years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"22 - 36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2022.2095040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2022.2095040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究探讨了消费者风格量表(CSI)的跨文化适用性,并测试了CSI对美国和韩国当代年轻消费者的概括性。在线调查分别收集了411名美国女性和680名韩国女性在两国各所大学的反馈。使用交叉验证方法,本研究揭示了美国消费者的七因素模型和韩国消费者的五因素模型与最初的Sproles和Kendall的八因素模型不同,这表明对当今全球消费者的决策风格(DMS)进行了实质性的修改。研究结果仅限于两国的年轻女性消费者。这两个国家之间的相同点和不同点可以为瞄准全球消费者的服装专业人士提供有用的见解。这一发现通过修改已有30多年历史的CSI,为分析当今的年轻时尚消费者提供了一种新的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Cultural study of decision-making styles for contemporary young consumers
ABSTRACT This study addressed the cross-cultural applicability and tested the generalizability of the Consumer Styles Inventory (CSI) for profiling contemporary young consumers in the U.S. and South Korea. Online surveys were used to collect 411 American and 680 South Korean female responses from various universities in both countries, respectively. Using a cross-validation approach, this study revealed a seven-factor model for U.S. consumers and a five-factor model for South Korean consumers differed from the original Sproles and Kendall’s eight-factor model, suggesting a substantial modification to profile Decision-making Styles (DMS) of today’s global consumers. Findings are limited to young female consumers in both countries. The similarities and differences found between these two countries can provide helpful insights to apparel professionals targeting global consumers. The findings contribute a new way of profiling today’s young fashion consumers by modifying existing CSI that have been used for more than 30 years.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education
International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信