内存数据库系统中的低开销异步检查点

Kun Ren, Thaddeus Diamond, D. Abadi, Alexander Thomson
{"title":"内存数据库系统中的低开销异步检查点","authors":"Kun Ren, Thaddeus Diamond, D. Abadi, Alexander Thomson","doi":"10.1145/2882903.2915966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As it becomes increasingly common for transaction processing systems to operate on datasets that fit within the main memory of a single machine or a cluster of commodity machines, traditional mechanisms for guaranteeing transaction durability---which typically involve synchronous log flushes---incur increasingly unappealing costs to otherwise lightweight transactions. Many applications have turned to periodically checkpointing full database state. However, existing checkpointing methods---even those which avoid freezing the storage layer---often come with significant costs to operation throughput, end-to-end latency, and total memory usage. This paper presents Checkpointing Asynchronously using Logical Consistency (CALC), a lightweight, asynchronous technique for capturing database snapshots that does not require a physical point of consistency to create a checkpoint, and avoids conspicuous latency spikes incurred by other database snapshotting schemes. Our experiments show that CALC can capture frequent checkpoints across a variety of transactional workloads with extremely small cost to transactional throughput and low additional memory usage compared to other state-of-the-art checkpointing systems.","PeriodicalId":20483,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-Overhead Asynchronous Checkpointing in Main-Memory Database Systems\",\"authors\":\"Kun Ren, Thaddeus Diamond, D. Abadi, Alexander Thomson\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2882903.2915966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As it becomes increasingly common for transaction processing systems to operate on datasets that fit within the main memory of a single machine or a cluster of commodity machines, traditional mechanisms for guaranteeing transaction durability---which typically involve synchronous log flushes---incur increasingly unappealing costs to otherwise lightweight transactions. Many applications have turned to periodically checkpointing full database state. However, existing checkpointing methods---even those which avoid freezing the storage layer---often come with significant costs to operation throughput, end-to-end latency, and total memory usage. This paper presents Checkpointing Asynchronously using Logical Consistency (CALC), a lightweight, asynchronous technique for capturing database snapshots that does not require a physical point of consistency to create a checkpoint, and avoids conspicuous latency spikes incurred by other database snapshotting schemes. Our experiments show that CALC can capture frequent checkpoints across a variety of transactional workloads with extremely small cost to transactional throughput and low additional memory usage compared to other state-of-the-art checkpointing systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2882903.2915966\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2882903.2915966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

随着事务处理系统对适合单个机器或商用机器集群的主内存的数据集进行操作变得越来越普遍,保证事务持久性的传统机制(通常涉及同步日志刷新)对于轻量级事务来说会产生越来越不吸引人的成本。许多应用程序已经转向定期检查点全数据库状态。然而,现有的检查点方法——即使是那些避免冻结存储层的方法——通常会在操作吞吐量、端到端延迟和总内存使用方面付出巨大代价。本文介绍了使用逻辑一致性(CALC)的异步检查点,这是一种轻量级的异步技术,用于捕获数据库快照,不需要物理一致性点来创建检查点,并避免了其他数据库快照方案引起的明显延迟峰值。我们的实验表明,与其他最先进的检查点系统相比,CALC可以在各种事务工作负载中捕获频繁的检查点,并且事务吞吐量的成本非常小,额外的内存使用也很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low-Overhead Asynchronous Checkpointing in Main-Memory Database Systems
As it becomes increasingly common for transaction processing systems to operate on datasets that fit within the main memory of a single machine or a cluster of commodity machines, traditional mechanisms for guaranteeing transaction durability---which typically involve synchronous log flushes---incur increasingly unappealing costs to otherwise lightweight transactions. Many applications have turned to periodically checkpointing full database state. However, existing checkpointing methods---even those which avoid freezing the storage layer---often come with significant costs to operation throughput, end-to-end latency, and total memory usage. This paper presents Checkpointing Asynchronously using Logical Consistency (CALC), a lightweight, asynchronous technique for capturing database snapshots that does not require a physical point of consistency to create a checkpoint, and avoids conspicuous latency spikes incurred by other database snapshotting schemes. Our experiments show that CALC can capture frequent checkpoints across a variety of transactional workloads with extremely small cost to transactional throughput and low additional memory usage compared to other state-of-the-art checkpointing systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信