多孔岩石中气液扩散及大块流体中基质阻位影响的实验研究

Xuanqing Lou, Nirjhor Chakraborty, Z. Karpyn, L. Ayala, N. Nagarajan, Zein Wijaya
{"title":"多孔岩石中气液扩散及大块流体中基质阻位影响的实验研究","authors":"Xuanqing Lou, Nirjhor Chakraborty, Z. Karpyn, L. Ayala, N. Nagarajan, Zein Wijaya","doi":"10.2118/195941-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The design of oil recovery processes by gas injection or vapor solvent relies on knowledge of diffusion coefficients to enable meaningful production predictions. However, lab measurements of diffusion coefficients are often performed on bulk fluids, without accountability for the hindrance caused by the pore network structure and tortuosity of porous media. As such, our ability to predict effective diffusion coefficients in porous rocks is inadequate and, additional laboratory work is needed to investigate the impact of the medium itself on transport by diffusion. In addition, experimental data on multi-phase diffusion coefficients are particularly scarce for tight rocks. This study therefore proposes an experimental methodology, based on a pressure-decay technique, to measure diffusion of injected gas in oil saturated porous rocks. A diffusion experiment of gas into bulk oil (without porous medium) provides an upper limit estimation of this gas-liquid diffusion coefficient. Diffusion experiments using limestone and Bakken shale provide insight into different degrees of restriction in high permeability versus low permeability media. Two analytical models and one numerical model were implemented and compared to determine the diffusion coefficients from the time-dependent experimental pressure-decay data. These diffusion coefficients were found in agreement with literature on corresponding data, demonstrating the validity of the modeling approaches used. Results indicate considerable hindrance to diffusion in porous media relative to bulk oil and relates to the tortuosity and constrictivity of the rock matrix. The diffusion coefficient of methane in bulk oil is 3.8 × 10−9 m2/s. In our limestone sample, this diffusion coefficient drops by one order of magnitude, ranging between 1.5 to 6.5 × 10−10 m2/s and, it drops by another order of magnitude in the Bakken shale sample to 2.0 × 10−11 m2/s.","PeriodicalId":10909,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Study of Gas-Liquid Diffusion in Porous Rocks and Bulk Fluids to Investigate the Effect of Rock Matrix Hindrance\",\"authors\":\"Xuanqing Lou, Nirjhor Chakraborty, Z. Karpyn, L. Ayala, N. Nagarajan, Zein Wijaya\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/195941-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The design of oil recovery processes by gas injection or vapor solvent relies on knowledge of diffusion coefficients to enable meaningful production predictions. However, lab measurements of diffusion coefficients are often performed on bulk fluids, without accountability for the hindrance caused by the pore network structure and tortuosity of porous media. As such, our ability to predict effective diffusion coefficients in porous rocks is inadequate and, additional laboratory work is needed to investigate the impact of the medium itself on transport by diffusion. In addition, experimental data on multi-phase diffusion coefficients are particularly scarce for tight rocks. This study therefore proposes an experimental methodology, based on a pressure-decay technique, to measure diffusion of injected gas in oil saturated porous rocks. A diffusion experiment of gas into bulk oil (without porous medium) provides an upper limit estimation of this gas-liquid diffusion coefficient. Diffusion experiments using limestone and Bakken shale provide insight into different degrees of restriction in high permeability versus low permeability media. Two analytical models and one numerical model were implemented and compared to determine the diffusion coefficients from the time-dependent experimental pressure-decay data. These diffusion coefficients were found in agreement with literature on corresponding data, demonstrating the validity of the modeling approaches used. Results indicate considerable hindrance to diffusion in porous media relative to bulk oil and relates to the tortuosity and constrictivity of the rock matrix. The diffusion coefficient of methane in bulk oil is 3.8 × 10−9 m2/s. In our limestone sample, this diffusion coefficient drops by one order of magnitude, ranging between 1.5 to 6.5 × 10−10 m2/s and, it drops by another order of magnitude in the Bakken shale sample to 2.0 × 10−11 m2/s.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/195941-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195941-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

注气或蒸汽溶剂采油工艺的设计依赖于扩散系数的知识,从而实现有意义的产量预测。然而,实验室对扩散系数的测量通常是在散装流体上进行的,而不考虑孔隙网络结构和多孔介质的扭曲造成的阻碍。因此,我们预测多孔岩石中有效扩散系数的能力是不够的,需要额外的实验室工作来研究介质本身对扩散输运的影响。此外,致密岩石多相扩散系数的实验数据尤其缺乏。因此,本研究提出了一种基于压力衰减技术的实验方法来测量注入气体在含油饱和多孔岩石中的扩散。气体在散装油(无多孔介质)中的扩散实验提供了该气液扩散系数的上限估计。利用石灰岩和Bakken页岩进行扩散实验,可以深入了解高渗透和低渗透介质中不同程度的限制。采用两种解析模型和一种数值模型进行比较,从随时间变化的压力衰减实验数据中确定扩散系数。这些扩散系数与相关数据的文献一致,证明了所使用的建模方法的有效性。结果表明,相对于散装油,多孔介质中的扩散有相当大的阻碍,这与岩石基质的弯曲和收缩有关。甲烷在散装油中的扩散系数为3.8 × 10−9 m2/s。在我们的石灰石样品中,扩散系数下降了一个数量级,范围在1.5到6.5 × 10−10 m2/s之间,在巴肯页岩样品中,扩散系数下降了另一个数量级,为2.0 × 10−11 m2/s。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental Study of Gas-Liquid Diffusion in Porous Rocks and Bulk Fluids to Investigate the Effect of Rock Matrix Hindrance
The design of oil recovery processes by gas injection or vapor solvent relies on knowledge of diffusion coefficients to enable meaningful production predictions. However, lab measurements of diffusion coefficients are often performed on bulk fluids, without accountability for the hindrance caused by the pore network structure and tortuosity of porous media. As such, our ability to predict effective diffusion coefficients in porous rocks is inadequate and, additional laboratory work is needed to investigate the impact of the medium itself on transport by diffusion. In addition, experimental data on multi-phase diffusion coefficients are particularly scarce for tight rocks. This study therefore proposes an experimental methodology, based on a pressure-decay technique, to measure diffusion of injected gas in oil saturated porous rocks. A diffusion experiment of gas into bulk oil (without porous medium) provides an upper limit estimation of this gas-liquid diffusion coefficient. Diffusion experiments using limestone and Bakken shale provide insight into different degrees of restriction in high permeability versus low permeability media. Two analytical models and one numerical model were implemented and compared to determine the diffusion coefficients from the time-dependent experimental pressure-decay data. These diffusion coefficients were found in agreement with literature on corresponding data, demonstrating the validity of the modeling approaches used. Results indicate considerable hindrance to diffusion in porous media relative to bulk oil and relates to the tortuosity and constrictivity of the rock matrix. The diffusion coefficient of methane in bulk oil is 3.8 × 10−9 m2/s. In our limestone sample, this diffusion coefficient drops by one order of magnitude, ranging between 1.5 to 6.5 × 10−10 m2/s and, it drops by another order of magnitude in the Bakken shale sample to 2.0 × 10−11 m2/s.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信