资助学生,购买学生:美国的经济援助

P. Marthers
{"title":"资助学生,购买学生:美国的经济援助","authors":"P. Marthers","doi":"10.5860/choice.43-4793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aiding Students, Buying Students: Financial Aid in America BY RUPERT WILKINSON VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2005; 346 PP. Reviewed by Paul Marthers College and university financial assistance in the United States has existed, in one form or another, since the founding of the first institutions of higher learning. At its core, financial help to students, whether it has been in the form of scholarships, loans, and work, has been about access. How and to whom that access has been provided has a complex and multilayered history bound up in notions of merit, obligation, and social justice, involving collisions between mission and market. Yet even in enrollment management circles, that history is elusive and fuzzy, especially the era before entities such as the College Scholarship Service and practices such as need-blind admission. Rupert Wilkinson's Aiding Students, Buying Students: Financial Aid in America fills a knowledge gap, explaining, summarizing, and examining the peculiarly American institution that has come to be known as financial aid. Wilkinson, an emeritus professor of American studies and history at England's University of Sussex, has crafted a book that will interest students of higher education policy, students seeking to understand the history of American colleges and universities, and anyone focused more generally on the history of u.s. institutions. Wilkinson's book should be required reading for admission and financial aid officers, college presidents, lawmakers, and boards of trustees. It is the result of fourteen years of research, including discussions with 475 officials at 133 colleges. Just the illuminating footnotes, extensive bibliography, and detailed glossary of terms could form the basis of a course in American financial aid. For those who choose merely to skim the book or use it simply as a reference, the final chapter, \"Reforming the System,\" is a wordfor-word must read. Here Wilkinson proposes policies and reiterates the complex issues shaping how college officials grapple with questions of access and bottom line pressures. Wilkinson's book is one I read with personal interest, because I am a product of post-World War II spending on higher education, a beneficiary of what was perhaps the apex of the need-based era of financial aid-I entered college in the late 19705. Without financial aid from the Vermont Student Assistance Corporation, the federal government, and the colleges I attended, I would not have completed a bachelor's degree and I would not now be a dean of admissions at an elite private college. Like others in and out of higher education, I have had little more than a vague suspicion that the financial aid policies since the 19505 have not always been standard operating procedure at America's colleges and universities. Aiding Students, Buying Students dispels the numerous myths that inhabit the territory in higher education occupied by financial aid. Chief among those myths is the belief that merit scholarships have only recently re-emerged to crowd out the ubiquitous need-based financial aid. Colleges, according to this belief, were historically driven just by altruistic aims when dispensing funds to worthy students. Such a view is a romanticized distortion of the facts, according to Wilkinson. His book demonstrates persuasively that there has been a longstanding historical tension between scholarship aid for the needy and scholarship aid for the meritorious. With the earliest scholarships, officials at Yale, just to name one example, debated whether to provide gift aid, loans, work-based aid, or some combination of each. The concept of scholarship aid, Wilkinson shows, has never been far removed from American conceptions about worthiness, self-reliance, and dependence. At Stanford, for example, the original policy of free tuition was criticized by Herbert Hoover, himself a beneficiary, for lowering students'\"sense of responsibility.\" Looking back to America's first university, Harvard, Wilkinson finds that a dominant intention behind need-based scholarship assistance was to make college affordable for the children of ministers, a primarily middle class lot. …","PeriodicalId":75260,"journal":{"name":"Tribal college and university research journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aiding Students, Buying Students: Financial Aid in America\",\"authors\":\"P. Marthers\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.43-4793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aiding Students, Buying Students: Financial Aid in America BY RUPERT WILKINSON VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2005; 346 PP. Reviewed by Paul Marthers College and university financial assistance in the United States has existed, in one form or another, since the founding of the first institutions of higher learning. At its core, financial help to students, whether it has been in the form of scholarships, loans, and work, has been about access. How and to whom that access has been provided has a complex and multilayered history bound up in notions of merit, obligation, and social justice, involving collisions between mission and market. Yet even in enrollment management circles, that history is elusive and fuzzy, especially the era before entities such as the College Scholarship Service and practices such as need-blind admission. Rupert Wilkinson's Aiding Students, Buying Students: Financial Aid in America fills a knowledge gap, explaining, summarizing, and examining the peculiarly American institution that has come to be known as financial aid. Wilkinson, an emeritus professor of American studies and history at England's University of Sussex, has crafted a book that will interest students of higher education policy, students seeking to understand the history of American colleges and universities, and anyone focused more generally on the history of u.s. institutions. Wilkinson's book should be required reading for admission and financial aid officers, college presidents, lawmakers, and boards of trustees. It is the result of fourteen years of research, including discussions with 475 officials at 133 colleges. Just the illuminating footnotes, extensive bibliography, and detailed glossary of terms could form the basis of a course in American financial aid. For those who choose merely to skim the book or use it simply as a reference, the final chapter, \\\"Reforming the System,\\\" is a wordfor-word must read. Here Wilkinson proposes policies and reiterates the complex issues shaping how college officials grapple with questions of access and bottom line pressures. Wilkinson's book is one I read with personal interest, because I am a product of post-World War II spending on higher education, a beneficiary of what was perhaps the apex of the need-based era of financial aid-I entered college in the late 19705. Without financial aid from the Vermont Student Assistance Corporation, the federal government, and the colleges I attended, I would not have completed a bachelor's degree and I would not now be a dean of admissions at an elite private college. Like others in and out of higher education, I have had little more than a vague suspicion that the financial aid policies since the 19505 have not always been standard operating procedure at America's colleges and universities. Aiding Students, Buying Students dispels the numerous myths that inhabit the territory in higher education occupied by financial aid. Chief among those myths is the belief that merit scholarships have only recently re-emerged to crowd out the ubiquitous need-based financial aid. Colleges, according to this belief, were historically driven just by altruistic aims when dispensing funds to worthy students. Such a view is a romanticized distortion of the facts, according to Wilkinson. His book demonstrates persuasively that there has been a longstanding historical tension between scholarship aid for the needy and scholarship aid for the meritorious. With the earliest scholarships, officials at Yale, just to name one example, debated whether to provide gift aid, loans, work-based aid, or some combination of each. The concept of scholarship aid, Wilkinson shows, has never been far removed from American conceptions about worthiness, self-reliance, and dependence. At Stanford, for example, the original policy of free tuition was criticized by Herbert Hoover, himself a beneficiary, for lowering students'\\\"sense of responsibility.\\\" Looking back to America's first university, Harvard, Wilkinson finds that a dominant intention behind need-based scholarship assistance was to make college affordable for the children of ministers, a primarily middle class lot. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":75260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tribal college and university research journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tribal college and university research journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-4793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribal college and university research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-4793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

资助学生,购买学生:美国的经济援助,鲁珀特·威尔金森范德比尔特大学出版社,2005;美国的学院和大学的财政援助,以这样或那样的形式存在,自从第一批高等教育机构成立以来。其核心是,对学生的经济帮助,无论是以奖学金、贷款还是工作的形式,都是关于获得机会的。如何以及向谁提供这种机会有着复杂而多层次的历史,与功绩、义务和社会正义的概念紧密联系在一起,涉及使命和市场之间的冲突。然而,即使在招生管理圈,这段历史也是难以捉摸和模糊的,尤其是在大学奖学金服务(College Scholarship Service)等机构和盲目录取(need-blind admission)等做法出现之前的那个时代。鲁珀特·威尔金森的《资助学生,购买学生:美国的经济援助》填补了知识空白,解释、总结和审视了美国特有的经济援助制度。威尔金森是英国苏塞克斯大学(University of Sussex)美国研究和历史荣誉退休教授,他精心创作的这本书将引起关注高等教育政策的学生、想要了解美国高校历史的学生,以及任何更关注美国院校历史的人的兴趣。威尔金森的书应该是招生和财政援助官员、大学校长、立法者和董事会的必读书目。这是14年研究的结果,包括与133所大学的475名官员讨论。只要有启发性的脚注、广泛的参考书目和详细的术语表,就可以构成美国经济援助课程的基础。对于那些只选择略读或仅仅将其作为参考的人来说,最后一章“改革体制”是一本必须逐字阅读的书。在这里,威尔金森提出了政策建议,并重申了影响大学官员如何应对入学问题和底线压力的复杂问题。威尔金森的书是一本我怀着个人兴趣阅读的书,因为我是二战后高等教育支出的产物,可能是基于需求的经济援助时代的顶峰时期的受益者——我在20世纪70年代末进入大学。如果没有佛蒙特州学生援助公司、联邦政府和我上过的大学的经济援助,我就不会完成学士学位,也不会成为一所精英私立大学的招生主任。像其他高等教育内外的人一样,我只是模糊地怀疑,自20世纪50年代以来,经济援助政策并不总是美国高校的标准操作程序。资助学生,购买学生打破了经济资助在高等教育领域所占据的众多神话。在这些误解中,最主要的是认为优秀奖学金只是最近才重新出现,以排挤无处不在的基于需求的经济援助。根据这种信念,大学在向有价值的学生分配资金时,历史上只是出于无私的目的。根据威尔金森的说法,这种观点是对事实的浪漫化扭曲。他的书令人信服地证明,在为贫困者提供奖学金和为优等生提供奖学金之间存在着长期存在的历史紧张关系。举个例子,在最早的奖学金发放过程中,耶鲁大学的官员们就是否提供礼物资助、贷款、工作资助,还是两者兼而有之进行了辩论。威尔金森指出,奖学金援助的概念从未远离美国人关于价值、自力更生和依赖的观念。例如,在斯坦福大学,最初的免学费政策遭到了受益者赫伯特·胡佛(Herbert Hoover)的批评,称其降低了学生的“责任感”。回顾美国第一所大学哈佛大学,威尔金森发现,基于需求的奖学金资助背后的一个主要目的是让牧师的孩子上得起大学,他们主要是中产阶级。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aiding Students, Buying Students: Financial Aid in America
Aiding Students, Buying Students: Financial Aid in America BY RUPERT WILKINSON VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2005; 346 PP. Reviewed by Paul Marthers College and university financial assistance in the United States has existed, in one form or another, since the founding of the first institutions of higher learning. At its core, financial help to students, whether it has been in the form of scholarships, loans, and work, has been about access. How and to whom that access has been provided has a complex and multilayered history bound up in notions of merit, obligation, and social justice, involving collisions between mission and market. Yet even in enrollment management circles, that history is elusive and fuzzy, especially the era before entities such as the College Scholarship Service and practices such as need-blind admission. Rupert Wilkinson's Aiding Students, Buying Students: Financial Aid in America fills a knowledge gap, explaining, summarizing, and examining the peculiarly American institution that has come to be known as financial aid. Wilkinson, an emeritus professor of American studies and history at England's University of Sussex, has crafted a book that will interest students of higher education policy, students seeking to understand the history of American colleges and universities, and anyone focused more generally on the history of u.s. institutions. Wilkinson's book should be required reading for admission and financial aid officers, college presidents, lawmakers, and boards of trustees. It is the result of fourteen years of research, including discussions with 475 officials at 133 colleges. Just the illuminating footnotes, extensive bibliography, and detailed glossary of terms could form the basis of a course in American financial aid. For those who choose merely to skim the book or use it simply as a reference, the final chapter, "Reforming the System," is a wordfor-word must read. Here Wilkinson proposes policies and reiterates the complex issues shaping how college officials grapple with questions of access and bottom line pressures. Wilkinson's book is one I read with personal interest, because I am a product of post-World War II spending on higher education, a beneficiary of what was perhaps the apex of the need-based era of financial aid-I entered college in the late 19705. Without financial aid from the Vermont Student Assistance Corporation, the federal government, and the colleges I attended, I would not have completed a bachelor's degree and I would not now be a dean of admissions at an elite private college. Like others in and out of higher education, I have had little more than a vague suspicion that the financial aid policies since the 19505 have not always been standard operating procedure at America's colleges and universities. Aiding Students, Buying Students dispels the numerous myths that inhabit the territory in higher education occupied by financial aid. Chief among those myths is the belief that merit scholarships have only recently re-emerged to crowd out the ubiquitous need-based financial aid. Colleges, according to this belief, were historically driven just by altruistic aims when dispensing funds to worthy students. Such a view is a romanticized distortion of the facts, according to Wilkinson. His book demonstrates persuasively that there has been a longstanding historical tension between scholarship aid for the needy and scholarship aid for the meritorious. With the earliest scholarships, officials at Yale, just to name one example, debated whether to provide gift aid, loans, work-based aid, or some combination of each. The concept of scholarship aid, Wilkinson shows, has never been far removed from American conceptions about worthiness, self-reliance, and dependence. At Stanford, for example, the original policy of free tuition was criticized by Herbert Hoover, himself a beneficiary, for lowering students'"sense of responsibility." Looking back to America's first university, Harvard, Wilkinson finds that a dominant intention behind need-based scholarship assistance was to make college affordable for the children of ministers, a primarily middle class lot. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信