{"title":"愤怒的道德底线","authors":"Lorenzo d’Orsi","doi":"10.3167/ARCS.2018.040104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the social construction of moral outrage, interpreting\nit as both an extemporaneous feeling and an enduring process, objectified in narratives\nand rituals and permeating public spaces as well as the intimate sphere of social actors’\nlives. Based on ethnography carried out in Istanbul, this contribution focuses on the\nassassination of the Turkish Armenian journalist Hrant Dink in 2007. This provoked a\nmoral shock and led to an annual commemoration in which thousands of people—distant\nin political, religious, ethnic positions—gather around a shared feeling of outrage.\nThe article retraces the narratives of innocence and the moral frames that make Dink’s\npublic figure different from other victims of state violence, thus enabling a moral and\nemotional identification of a large audience. Outrage over Dink’s murder has become\na creative, mobilizing force that fosters new relationships between national history and\nsubjectivity, and de-reifies essentialized social boundaries and identity claims.","PeriodicalId":36783,"journal":{"name":"Conflict and Society","volume":"76 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral Thresholds of Outrage\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo d’Orsi\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/ARCS.2018.040104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyses the social construction of moral outrage, interpreting\\nit as both an extemporaneous feeling and an enduring process, objectified in narratives\\nand rituals and permeating public spaces as well as the intimate sphere of social actors’\\nlives. Based on ethnography carried out in Istanbul, this contribution focuses on the\\nassassination of the Turkish Armenian journalist Hrant Dink in 2007. This provoked a\\nmoral shock and led to an annual commemoration in which thousands of people—distant\\nin political, religious, ethnic positions—gather around a shared feeling of outrage.\\nThe article retraces the narratives of innocence and the moral frames that make Dink’s\\npublic figure different from other victims of state violence, thus enabling a moral and\\nemotional identification of a large audience. Outrage over Dink’s murder has become\\na creative, mobilizing force that fosters new relationships between national history and\\nsubjectivity, and de-reifies essentialized social boundaries and identity claims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conflict and Society\",\"volume\":\"76 4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conflict and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/ARCS.2018.040104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/ARCS.2018.040104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article analyses the social construction of moral outrage, interpreting
it as both an extemporaneous feeling and an enduring process, objectified in narratives
and rituals and permeating public spaces as well as the intimate sphere of social actors’
lives. Based on ethnography carried out in Istanbul, this contribution focuses on the
assassination of the Turkish Armenian journalist Hrant Dink in 2007. This provoked a
moral shock and led to an annual commemoration in which thousands of people—distant
in political, religious, ethnic positions—gather around a shared feeling of outrage.
The article retraces the narratives of innocence and the moral frames that make Dink’s
public figure different from other victims of state violence, thus enabling a moral and
emotional identification of a large audience. Outrage over Dink’s murder has become
a creative, mobilizing force that fosters new relationships between national history and
subjectivity, and de-reifies essentialized social boundaries and identity claims.