基于NASA和O&G风险管理流程差距评估的流程改进

J. Mayfield
{"title":"基于NASA和O&G风险管理流程差距评估的流程改进","authors":"J. Mayfield","doi":"10.4043/29510-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n What can the aerospace safety and systems engineering community teach the commercial Oil and Gas (O&G) industry about streamlining risk management processes when NASA is not known for its streamlined practices and how much improvement can be realized by the O&G industry, if any? Addressed in this paper are these basic questions. This assessment identifies improvements to risk management requirements for an O&G company. The methods of performing the assessment and developing recommendations for improvements are provided. These recommendations clearly show the benefit of incorporating these processes for O&G communities.\n Through the mishap investigation reports due to lost Space Shuttles and other similar incidents, NASA has developed mature processes associated with risk management. In a similar manner, the O&G industry has had to develop its own processes through mishaps they likewise have encountered. A detailed and holistic examination was conducted of a major O&G company’s risk management procedure requirements, starting with risk planning, then risk assessment, risk response, monitoring and control of the risk, risk learnings and closure, and finally, risk governance. Upon completing the assessment, recommendations for improvement to the company’s risk management procedure requirements were made.\n NASA’s risk management process and Systems Engineering handbook were used to examine the O&G company’s risk management procedure. Each requirement within the procedure was placed into a spreadsheet and examined for appropriateness, with roles and responsibilities mapped to each of the requirements. Areas of benefit were identified and examined for feasibility, with recommendations for improvement presented to the company’s risk management personnel.\n The paper presents the findings of the assessment, and recommends improvements based on this assessment. Experts within both the O&G and aerospace industries, with extensive experience in mishap investigations, reviewed the results of the assessment and the recommended improvements. Feasibility of implementation was determined by examining the recommendations from a cost, resource and technical perspective.","PeriodicalId":10948,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, May 07, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process Improvement Based on a Gap Assessment of NASA and O&G Risk Management Processes\",\"authors\":\"J. Mayfield\",\"doi\":\"10.4043/29510-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n What can the aerospace safety and systems engineering community teach the commercial Oil and Gas (O&G) industry about streamlining risk management processes when NASA is not known for its streamlined practices and how much improvement can be realized by the O&G industry, if any? Addressed in this paper are these basic questions. This assessment identifies improvements to risk management requirements for an O&G company. The methods of performing the assessment and developing recommendations for improvements are provided. These recommendations clearly show the benefit of incorporating these processes for O&G communities.\\n Through the mishap investigation reports due to lost Space Shuttles and other similar incidents, NASA has developed mature processes associated with risk management. In a similar manner, the O&G industry has had to develop its own processes through mishaps they likewise have encountered. A detailed and holistic examination was conducted of a major O&G company’s risk management procedure requirements, starting with risk planning, then risk assessment, risk response, monitoring and control of the risk, risk learnings and closure, and finally, risk governance. Upon completing the assessment, recommendations for improvement to the company’s risk management procedure requirements were made.\\n NASA’s risk management process and Systems Engineering handbook were used to examine the O&G company’s risk management procedure. Each requirement within the procedure was placed into a spreadsheet and examined for appropriateness, with roles and responsibilities mapped to each of the requirements. Areas of benefit were identified and examined for feasibility, with recommendations for improvement presented to the company’s risk management personnel.\\n The paper presents the findings of the assessment, and recommends improvements based on this assessment. Experts within both the O&G and aerospace industries, with extensive experience in mishap investigations, reviewed the results of the assessment and the recommended improvements. Feasibility of implementation was determined by examining the recommendations from a cost, resource and technical perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, May 07, 2019\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, May 07, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4043/29510-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, May 07, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29510-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在美国国家航空航天局(NASA)并不以其精简的实践而闻名的情况下,航空安全和系统工程社区可以向商业石油和天然气(O&G)行业传授什么关于简化风险管理流程的知识?如果有的话,石油和天然气行业可以实现多少改进?本文讨论的就是这些基本问题。该评估确定了油气公司风险管理需求的改进。提供了进行评估和提出改进建议的方法。这些建议清楚地显示了将这些流程纳入油气社区的好处。通过航天飞机失事和其他类似事故的事故调查报告,NASA已经制定了成熟的风险管理流程。与此类似,油气行业也不得不在遇到类似事故的情况下开发自己的流程。对一家大型油气公司的风险管理程序要求进行了详细而全面的检查,从风险规划开始,然后是风险评估、风险响应、风险监测和控制、风险学习和关闭,最后是风险治理。评估完成后,对公司风险管理程序要求提出改进建议。NASA的风险管理过程和系统工程手册被用来检查油气公司的风险管理程序。过程中的每个需求都被放入一个电子表格中,并检查其适当性,将角色和职责映射到每个需求。确定并审查了效益领域的可行性,并向公司的风险管理人员提出了改进建议。本文介绍了评估的结果,并在此评估的基础上提出了改进建议。油气和航空航天业的专家在事故调查方面拥有丰富的经验,他们审查了评估结果并提出了改进建议。通过从费用、资源和技术角度审查各项建议,确定了执行的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Process Improvement Based on a Gap Assessment of NASA and O&G Risk Management Processes
What can the aerospace safety and systems engineering community teach the commercial Oil and Gas (O&G) industry about streamlining risk management processes when NASA is not known for its streamlined practices and how much improvement can be realized by the O&G industry, if any? Addressed in this paper are these basic questions. This assessment identifies improvements to risk management requirements for an O&G company. The methods of performing the assessment and developing recommendations for improvements are provided. These recommendations clearly show the benefit of incorporating these processes for O&G communities. Through the mishap investigation reports due to lost Space Shuttles and other similar incidents, NASA has developed mature processes associated with risk management. In a similar manner, the O&G industry has had to develop its own processes through mishaps they likewise have encountered. A detailed and holistic examination was conducted of a major O&G company’s risk management procedure requirements, starting with risk planning, then risk assessment, risk response, monitoring and control of the risk, risk learnings and closure, and finally, risk governance. Upon completing the assessment, recommendations for improvement to the company’s risk management procedure requirements were made. NASA’s risk management process and Systems Engineering handbook were used to examine the O&G company’s risk management procedure. Each requirement within the procedure was placed into a spreadsheet and examined for appropriateness, with roles and responsibilities mapped to each of the requirements. Areas of benefit were identified and examined for feasibility, with recommendations for improvement presented to the company’s risk management personnel. The paper presents the findings of the assessment, and recommends improvements based on this assessment. Experts within both the O&G and aerospace industries, with extensive experience in mishap investigations, reviewed the results of the assessment and the recommended improvements. Feasibility of implementation was determined by examining the recommendations from a cost, resource and technical perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信