{"title":"对面部疼痛量表的误解——成人临床实践中的修正","authors":"Grazyna Jastrzab , Susie Kerr , Greg Fairbrother","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2009.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) is commonly used for measuring pain intensity in paediatric and adult populations. When applied in a clinical setting, this scale may not always be used correctly as a patient self-report.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A sample of 99 nurses was selected at random from medical, surgical, critical care and aged care units over a 1-week snapshot period in 2002. This group of nurses was surveyed via open-ended questioning to assess their knowledge about applying the FPS-R, when measuring pain in adult patients who are able to communicate. Following the survey, a range of ongoing education strategies was implemented. Three years later, the survey was repeated using the same process (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->101).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the initial survey, 52% of respondents gave a correct answer, stating that they would ask the patient to choose the face representing their level of pain. The second survey yielded a similar result with 55% of answers coded as correct by the investigators.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A substantial proportion of surveyed nurses were unable to describe the correct use of the FPS-R at either point of knowledge canvassing. In practice, it would appear that these nurses, if using the FPS-R, would not ask the patient about the intensity of their pain in situations when the patient is capable of a self-report. Implemented education strategies did not contribute to the correct application of FPS-R tool. Clinicians need to be aware of the possibility of misinterpreted application of self-reporting pain intensity measurement tools which employ a facial expression.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.03.001","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misinterpretation of the Faces Pain Scale-Revised in adult clinical practice\",\"authors\":\"Grazyna Jastrzab , Susie Kerr , Greg Fairbrother\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acpain.2009.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) is commonly used for measuring pain intensity in paediatric and adult populations. When applied in a clinical setting, this scale may not always be used correctly as a patient self-report.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A sample of 99 nurses was selected at random from medical, surgical, critical care and aged care units over a 1-week snapshot period in 2002. This group of nurses was surveyed via open-ended questioning to assess their knowledge about applying the FPS-R, when measuring pain in adult patients who are able to communicate. Following the survey, a range of ongoing education strategies was implemented. Three years later, the survey was repeated using the same process (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->101).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the initial survey, 52% of respondents gave a correct answer, stating that they would ask the patient to choose the face representing their level of pain. The second survey yielded a similar result with 55% of answers coded as correct by the investigators.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A substantial proportion of surveyed nurses were unable to describe the correct use of the FPS-R at either point of knowledge canvassing. In practice, it would appear that these nurses, if using the FPS-R, would not ask the patient about the intensity of their pain in situations when the patient is capable of a self-report. Implemented education strategies did not contribute to the correct application of FPS-R tool. Clinicians need to be aware of the possibility of misinterpreted application of self-reporting pain intensity measurement tools which employ a facial expression.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.03.001\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366007109000047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366007109000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Misinterpretation of the Faces Pain Scale-Revised in adult clinical practice
Background
The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) is commonly used for measuring pain intensity in paediatric and adult populations. When applied in a clinical setting, this scale may not always be used correctly as a patient self-report.
Methods
A sample of 99 nurses was selected at random from medical, surgical, critical care and aged care units over a 1-week snapshot period in 2002. This group of nurses was surveyed via open-ended questioning to assess their knowledge about applying the FPS-R, when measuring pain in adult patients who are able to communicate. Following the survey, a range of ongoing education strategies was implemented. Three years later, the survey was repeated using the same process (n = 101).
Results
In the initial survey, 52% of respondents gave a correct answer, stating that they would ask the patient to choose the face representing their level of pain. The second survey yielded a similar result with 55% of answers coded as correct by the investigators.
Conclusion
A substantial proportion of surveyed nurses were unable to describe the correct use of the FPS-R at either point of knowledge canvassing. In practice, it would appear that these nurses, if using the FPS-R, would not ask the patient about the intensity of their pain in situations when the patient is capable of a self-report. Implemented education strategies did not contribute to the correct application of FPS-R tool. Clinicians need to be aware of the possibility of misinterpreted application of self-reporting pain intensity measurement tools which employ a facial expression.