基于人群的肺实性结节CT筛查及人工智能应用研究

Feng Yang, Jun Fan, Junyi Tianzhou, Fan Yang, Yun Li, Xianping Liu, Jian-feng Li, G. Jiang, Jun Wang
{"title":"基于人群的肺实性结节CT筛查及人工智能应用研究","authors":"Feng Yang, Jun Fan, Junyi Tianzhou, Fan Yang, Yun Li, Xianping Liu, Jian-feng Li, G. Jiang, Jun Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN112434-20191126-00420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the application of low-dose chest CT(LDCT) in the screening of pulmonary subsolid nodules in population and the application value of artificial intelligence. \n \n \nMethods \nPeople who received chest LDCT screening between January 2015 and December 2017 were included. A retrospective study was developed to analyze the enrolled population features , detection of pulmonary subsolid nodules and independent predictors of subsolid nodules , and to evaluate the accuracy of the artificial intelligence reading method. \n \n \nResults \nResult of three cross-sectional studies reveals that the detection rates of pulmonary subsolid nodules were 0.42%, 0.69% and 0.92% in three rounds. 726 cases who completed the three rounds of screening were included in the cohort study. The cohort population was predominantly male(83.2%), with a median age of 43 years, and nearly half of the subjects(47.0%) had a history of smoking. GEE revealed that the patient's family history of lung cancer(OR=8.753, 95%CI: 1.877-40.816, P=0.006) was an independent predictor of the detection of subsolid nodules. In the 110 kVp tube voltage group, AUC of AI model was 0.740, and AUC of the manual reading method was 0.721, no significant differences were observed(P=0.502); when the preseted cutoff value of AI model was 0.75, the NRI was -0.15, indicating the accuracy of AI model was inferior to manual method(P=0.006). In the 130 kVp tube voltage group, AUC of the model was 0.888, and AUC of the manual reading method was 0.756, no significant differences were observed(P=0.128); and the NRI was 0.19, indicating the accuracy of AI model was not inferior to manual method(P=0.123). \n \n \nConclusion \nThis population' s detection rates of pulmonary subsolid nodules were 0.42%-0.92%. Family history of lung cancer was an independent predictor of subsolid pulmonary nodules. The result of AI pulmonary nodule detection model could be a reference when the training set data parameters match the actual application parameters. \n \n \nKey words: \nLung neoplasms; Cancer screening; Multidetector computed tomography; Subsolid nodule; Artificial intelligence","PeriodicalId":10181,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population-based research of pulmonary subsolid nodule CT screening and artificial intelligence application\",\"authors\":\"Feng Yang, Jun Fan, Junyi Tianzhou, Fan Yang, Yun Li, Xianping Liu, Jian-feng Li, G. Jiang, Jun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.CN112434-20191126-00420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the application of low-dose chest CT(LDCT) in the screening of pulmonary subsolid nodules in population and the application value of artificial intelligence. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nPeople who received chest LDCT screening between January 2015 and December 2017 were included. A retrospective study was developed to analyze the enrolled population features , detection of pulmonary subsolid nodules and independent predictors of subsolid nodules , and to evaluate the accuracy of the artificial intelligence reading method. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nResult of three cross-sectional studies reveals that the detection rates of pulmonary subsolid nodules were 0.42%, 0.69% and 0.92% in three rounds. 726 cases who completed the three rounds of screening were included in the cohort study. The cohort population was predominantly male(83.2%), with a median age of 43 years, and nearly half of the subjects(47.0%) had a history of smoking. GEE revealed that the patient's family history of lung cancer(OR=8.753, 95%CI: 1.877-40.816, P=0.006) was an independent predictor of the detection of subsolid nodules. In the 110 kVp tube voltage group, AUC of AI model was 0.740, and AUC of the manual reading method was 0.721, no significant differences were observed(P=0.502); when the preseted cutoff value of AI model was 0.75, the NRI was -0.15, indicating the accuracy of AI model was inferior to manual method(P=0.006). In the 130 kVp tube voltage group, AUC of the model was 0.888, and AUC of the manual reading method was 0.756, no significant differences were observed(P=0.128); and the NRI was 0.19, indicating the accuracy of AI model was not inferior to manual method(P=0.123). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nThis population' s detection rates of pulmonary subsolid nodules were 0.42%-0.92%. Family history of lung cancer was an independent predictor of subsolid pulmonary nodules. The result of AI pulmonary nodule detection model could be a reference when the training set data parameters match the actual application parameters. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nLung neoplasms; Cancer screening; Multidetector computed tomography; Subsolid nodule; Artificial intelligence\",\"PeriodicalId\":10181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN112434-20191126-00420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN112434-20191126-00420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的探讨低剂量胸部CT(LDCT)在人群肺亚实性结节筛查中的应用及人工智能的应用价值。方法纳入2015年1月至2017年12月期间接受胸部LDCT筛查的患者。我们开展了一项回顾性研究,分析入组人群特征、肺亚实性结节的检测和亚实性结节的独立预测因素,并评估人工智能阅读方法的准确性。结果三次横断面研究结果显示,三轮肺实下结节检出率分别为0.42%、0.69%和0.92%。726例完成三轮筛查的患者被纳入队列研究。队列人群以男性为主(83.2%),中位年龄为43岁,近一半的受试者(47.0%)有吸烟史。结果显示,患者的肺癌家族史(OR=8.753, 95%CI: 1.877-40.816, P=0.006)是检测亚实性结节的独立预测因子。在110 kVp管电压组,AI模型的AUC为0.740,手工阅读法的AUC为0.721,差异无统计学意义(P=0.502);当人工智能模型的预设截断值为0.75时,NRI为-0.15,表明人工智能模型的准确率低于人工方法(P=0.006)。130 kVp管电压组,模型的AUC为0.888,手工读数法的AUC为0.756,差异无统计学意义(P=0.128);NRI为0.19,表明人工智能模型的准确率不低于人工方法(P=0.123)。结论该人群肺实下结节检出率为0.42% ~ 0.92%。肺癌家族史是肺实性结节的独立预测因子。当训练集数据参数与实际应用参数匹配时,人工智能肺结节检测模型的结果可作为参考。关键词:肺肿瘤;癌症筛查;多检测器计算机断层扫描;Subsolid结节;人工智能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Population-based research of pulmonary subsolid nodule CT screening and artificial intelligence application
Objective To investigate the application of low-dose chest CT(LDCT) in the screening of pulmonary subsolid nodules in population and the application value of artificial intelligence. Methods People who received chest LDCT screening between January 2015 and December 2017 were included. A retrospective study was developed to analyze the enrolled population features , detection of pulmonary subsolid nodules and independent predictors of subsolid nodules , and to evaluate the accuracy of the artificial intelligence reading method. Results Result of three cross-sectional studies reveals that the detection rates of pulmonary subsolid nodules were 0.42%, 0.69% and 0.92% in three rounds. 726 cases who completed the three rounds of screening were included in the cohort study. The cohort population was predominantly male(83.2%), with a median age of 43 years, and nearly half of the subjects(47.0%) had a history of smoking. GEE revealed that the patient's family history of lung cancer(OR=8.753, 95%CI: 1.877-40.816, P=0.006) was an independent predictor of the detection of subsolid nodules. In the 110 kVp tube voltage group, AUC of AI model was 0.740, and AUC of the manual reading method was 0.721, no significant differences were observed(P=0.502); when the preseted cutoff value of AI model was 0.75, the NRI was -0.15, indicating the accuracy of AI model was inferior to manual method(P=0.006). In the 130 kVp tube voltage group, AUC of the model was 0.888, and AUC of the manual reading method was 0.756, no significant differences were observed(P=0.128); and the NRI was 0.19, indicating the accuracy of AI model was not inferior to manual method(P=0.123). Conclusion This population' s detection rates of pulmonary subsolid nodules were 0.42%-0.92%. Family history of lung cancer was an independent predictor of subsolid pulmonary nodules. The result of AI pulmonary nodule detection model could be a reference when the training set data parameters match the actual application parameters. Key words: Lung neoplasms; Cancer screening; Multidetector computed tomography; Subsolid nodule; Artificial intelligence
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信