液化数值砂柱的孔隙压力响应

W. Prakoso, D. Mazaya, Rumaisha A. Kartika
{"title":"液化数值砂柱的孔隙压力响应","authors":"W. Prakoso, D. Mazaya, Rumaisha A. Kartika","doi":"10.22146/jcef.3395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Palu 28 September 2021 M 7.5 Earthquake has brought several new challenges to the understanding of liquefaction and its following geotechnical phenomena. In addition, that main shock was followed by a series of aftershocks within a short time frame. The common geotechnical conditions of Palu area include layered soils conditions, and the associated variability of geotechnical conditions exists. This paper reports the dynamic effective stress analysis (ESA) study of four different liquefiable layered sand columns, and the above three conditions (layered soils, variability, aftershocks) are explicitly modeled. The dynamic ESA employs the PM4Sand constitutive model for liquefiable sands, implemented in the OpenSees platform. Three ground motion sets (“main shock only”, “main shock plus aftershock”, “aftershock” only) of variable amplitude, single frequency harmonic motions are used. The models are validated by comparing qualitatively their results against laboratory test results and field measurements. The saturated sand layers in all cases subjected to “main shock only” are liquefied with different detailed excess pore pressure (EPP) responses, highlighting the importance of the system response of liquefying sand columns. The cases subjected to “main shock plus aftershock” show a much a longer higher EPP state, while cases subjected to both “main shock plus aftershock” and “aftershock only” indicate a longer liquefaction state during the aftershock. The implication of the longer duration in the higher EPP state and the longer liquefaction state is that a longer duration of lower shear strength conditions would exist. The different EPP responses resulted from different geotechnical conditions represented by the four sand columns suggest that the variability of geotechnical conditions would have an important influence on the system response.","PeriodicalId":31890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pore Pressure Responses of Liquefied Numerical Sand Columns\",\"authors\":\"W. Prakoso, D. Mazaya, Rumaisha A. Kartika\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/jcef.3395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Palu 28 September 2021 M 7.5 Earthquake has brought several new challenges to the understanding of liquefaction and its following geotechnical phenomena. In addition, that main shock was followed by a series of aftershocks within a short time frame. The common geotechnical conditions of Palu area include layered soils conditions, and the associated variability of geotechnical conditions exists. This paper reports the dynamic effective stress analysis (ESA) study of four different liquefiable layered sand columns, and the above three conditions (layered soils, variability, aftershocks) are explicitly modeled. The dynamic ESA employs the PM4Sand constitutive model for liquefiable sands, implemented in the OpenSees platform. Three ground motion sets (“main shock only”, “main shock plus aftershock”, “aftershock” only) of variable amplitude, single frequency harmonic motions are used. The models are validated by comparing qualitatively their results against laboratory test results and field measurements. The saturated sand layers in all cases subjected to “main shock only” are liquefied with different detailed excess pore pressure (EPP) responses, highlighting the importance of the system response of liquefying sand columns. The cases subjected to “main shock plus aftershock” show a much a longer higher EPP state, while cases subjected to both “main shock plus aftershock” and “aftershock only” indicate a longer liquefaction state during the aftershock. The implication of the longer duration in the higher EPP state and the longer liquefaction state is that a longer duration of lower shear strength conditions would exist. The different EPP responses resulted from different geotechnical conditions represented by the four sand columns suggest that the variability of geotechnical conditions would have an important influence on the system response.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.3395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.3395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021年9月28日的帕卢7.5级地震为理解液化及其后续岩土工程现象带来了一些新的挑战。此外,主震之后在短时间内又发生了一系列余震。帕卢地区常见的土工条件包括层状土工条件,土工条件存在相关的变异性。本文报道了四种不同可液化层状砂柱的动态有效应力分析(ESA)研究,并明确模拟了上述三种条件(层状土、变率、余震)。动态ESA采用可液化砂的PM4Sand本构模型,该模型已在OpenSees平台上实现。三组地震动(“仅主震”、“主震加余震”、“仅余震”)采用变幅、单频谐波运动。通过将模型的结果与实验室测试结果和现场测量结果进行定性比较,验证了模型的有效性。在“仅主震”作用下,饱和砂层的液化具有不同的详细超孔隙压力(EPP)响应,突出了液化砂柱系统响应的重要性。“主震+余震”情况下的液化状态较长,而“主震+余震”和“仅余震”情况下的液化状态较长。高EPP状态持续时间越长,液化状态持续时间越长,则低抗剪强度状态持续时间越长。4个砂柱所代表的不同岩土条件对EPP的不同响应表明,岩土条件的变异性对系统响应有重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pore Pressure Responses of Liquefied Numerical Sand Columns
The Palu 28 September 2021 M 7.5 Earthquake has brought several new challenges to the understanding of liquefaction and its following geotechnical phenomena. In addition, that main shock was followed by a series of aftershocks within a short time frame. The common geotechnical conditions of Palu area include layered soils conditions, and the associated variability of geotechnical conditions exists. This paper reports the dynamic effective stress analysis (ESA) study of four different liquefiable layered sand columns, and the above three conditions (layered soils, variability, aftershocks) are explicitly modeled. The dynamic ESA employs the PM4Sand constitutive model for liquefiable sands, implemented in the OpenSees platform. Three ground motion sets (“main shock only”, “main shock plus aftershock”, “aftershock” only) of variable amplitude, single frequency harmonic motions are used. The models are validated by comparing qualitatively their results against laboratory test results and field measurements. The saturated sand layers in all cases subjected to “main shock only” are liquefied with different detailed excess pore pressure (EPP) responses, highlighting the importance of the system response of liquefying sand columns. The cases subjected to “main shock plus aftershock” show a much a longer higher EPP state, while cases subjected to both “main shock plus aftershock” and “aftershock only” indicate a longer liquefaction state during the aftershock. The implication of the longer duration in the higher EPP state and the longer liquefaction state is that a longer duration of lower shear strength conditions would exist. The different EPP responses resulted from different geotechnical conditions represented by the four sand columns suggest that the variability of geotechnical conditions would have an important influence on the system response.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信