野外的意义生成:对保护区内从业者收集的地理空间数据及其综合的综述,以减少偷猎

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Wendy L. Zeller Zigaitis, A. Robinson
{"title":"野外的意义生成:对保护区内从业者收集的地理空间数据及其综合的综述,以减少偷猎","authors":"Wendy L. Zeller Zigaitis, A. Robinson","doi":"10.1080/19475683.2023.2192761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A key challenge for mitigating poaching within protected areas is to understand the geospatial data that are collected by practitioners in protected areas and to characterize the ability to synthesize those data with landscape-level data to form a holistic picture of the movement patterns of humans and animals. Literature reviewed from the past 15 years on geospatial data collected by practitioners to mitigate wildlife poaching reveals a gap in our knowledge on how protected area practitioners make sense of geospatial data that are collected within protected areas. Geospatial data collected within protected areas provide an understanding of movement patterns of humans and animals, which can provide insight on best practices for poaching mitigation, to include where to emplace new geospatial sensors. We classify these data as device-based and human-generated, and their potential to provide geospatially referenced information that forms patterns of poaching activity. This article examines two primary types of geospatial data collected in protected areas, highlights the challenges associated with this data, and discusses knowledge gaps regarding how protected areas make sense of spatial data. We conclude with recommendations for future research on characterizing how geospatial data is represented in protected areas, and filling knowledge gaps on how protected area personnel use those data.","PeriodicalId":46270,"journal":{"name":"Annals of GIS","volume":"5 1","pages":"319 - 335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensemaking in the Wild: A Review of Practitioner Collected Geospatial Data and its Synthesis within Protected Areas for Poaching Mitigation\",\"authors\":\"Wendy L. Zeller Zigaitis, A. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19475683.2023.2192761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A key challenge for mitigating poaching within protected areas is to understand the geospatial data that are collected by practitioners in protected areas and to characterize the ability to synthesize those data with landscape-level data to form a holistic picture of the movement patterns of humans and animals. Literature reviewed from the past 15 years on geospatial data collected by practitioners to mitigate wildlife poaching reveals a gap in our knowledge on how protected area practitioners make sense of geospatial data that are collected within protected areas. Geospatial data collected within protected areas provide an understanding of movement patterns of humans and animals, which can provide insight on best practices for poaching mitigation, to include where to emplace new geospatial sensors. We classify these data as device-based and human-generated, and their potential to provide geospatially referenced information that forms patterns of poaching activity. This article examines two primary types of geospatial data collected in protected areas, highlights the challenges associated with this data, and discusses knowledge gaps regarding how protected areas make sense of spatial data. We conclude with recommendations for future research on characterizing how geospatial data is represented in protected areas, and filling knowledge gaps on how protected area personnel use those data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of GIS\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"319 - 335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of GIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2023.2192761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of GIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2023.2192761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

减轻保护区内偷猎的一个关键挑战是了解保护区从业人员收集的地理空间数据,并描述将这些数据与景观级数据综合起来的能力,以形成人类和动物运动模式的整体图景。回顾过去15年从业人员为减少野生动物偷猎而收集的地理空间数据的文献,我们发现在保护区从业人员如何理解保护区内收集的地理空间数据方面,我们的知识存在差距。在保护区内收集的地理空间数据有助于了解人类和动物的活动模式,从而有助于了解减少偷猎的最佳做法,包括在何处安放新的地理空间传感器。我们将这些数据分为基于设备的和人为生成的,以及它们提供形成偷猎活动模式的地理空间参考信息的潜力。本文研究了在保护区收集的两种主要地理空间数据类型,强调了与这些数据相关的挑战,并讨论了关于保护区如何理解空间数据的知识差距。最后,我们对未来的研究提出了建议,包括如何描述保护区的地理空间数据,以及如何填补保护区人员如何使用这些数据的知识空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensemaking in the Wild: A Review of Practitioner Collected Geospatial Data and its Synthesis within Protected Areas for Poaching Mitigation
ABSTRACT A key challenge for mitigating poaching within protected areas is to understand the geospatial data that are collected by practitioners in protected areas and to characterize the ability to synthesize those data with landscape-level data to form a holistic picture of the movement patterns of humans and animals. Literature reviewed from the past 15 years on geospatial data collected by practitioners to mitigate wildlife poaching reveals a gap in our knowledge on how protected area practitioners make sense of geospatial data that are collected within protected areas. Geospatial data collected within protected areas provide an understanding of movement patterns of humans and animals, which can provide insight on best practices for poaching mitigation, to include where to emplace new geospatial sensors. We classify these data as device-based and human-generated, and their potential to provide geospatially referenced information that forms patterns of poaching activity. This article examines two primary types of geospatial data collected in protected areas, highlights the challenges associated with this data, and discusses knowledge gaps regarding how protected areas make sense of spatial data. We conclude with recommendations for future research on characterizing how geospatial data is represented in protected areas, and filling knowledge gaps on how protected area personnel use those data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of GIS
Annals of GIS Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信