Ying Tian, E. Wittwer, S. Kapa, Christopher J. McLeod, P. Xiao, P. Noseworthy, S. Mulpuru, A. Deshmukh, Hon-chi Lee, M. Ackerman, S. Asirvatham, T. Munger, Xingpeng Liu, P. Friedman, Y. Cha
{"title":"经皮星状神经节阻滞治疗电风暴患者的疗效。","authors":"Ying Tian, E. Wittwer, S. Kapa, Christopher J. McLeod, P. Xiao, P. Noseworthy, S. Mulpuru, A. Deshmukh, Hon-chi Lee, M. Ackerman, S. Asirvatham, T. Munger, Xingpeng Liu, P. Friedman, Y. Cha","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nPercutaneous stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) has been used for drug-refractory electrical storm due to ventricular arrhythmia (VA); however, the effects and long-term outcomes have not been well studied.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis study included 30 consecutive patients who had drug-refractory electrical storm and underwent percutaneous SGB between October 1, 2013, and March 31, 2018. Bupivacaine, alone or combined with lidocaine, was injected into the neck with good local anesthetic spread in the vicinity of the left stellate ganglion (n=15) or both stellate ganglia (n=15). Data were collected for patient clinical characteristics, immediate and long-term outcomes, and procedure-related complications.\n\n\nRESULTS\nClinical characteristics included age, 58±14 years; men, 73.3%; and left ventricular ejection fraction, 34±16%. At 24 hours, 60% of patients were free of VA. Patients whose VA was controlled had a lower hospital mortality rate than patients whose VA continued (5.6% versus 50.0%; P=0.009). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interrogation showed a significant 92% reduction in VA episodes from 26±41 to 2±4 in the 72 hours after SGB (P<0.001). Patients who died during the same hospitalization (n=7) were more likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy (100% versus 43.5%; P=0.03) and recurrent VA within 24 hours (85.7% versus 26.1%; P=0.009). There were no procedure-related major complications.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nSGB effectively attenuated electrical storm in more than half of patients without procedure-related complications. Percutaneous SGB may be considered for stabilizing ventricular rhythm in patients for whom other therapies have failed.","PeriodicalId":10167,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective Use of Percutaneous Stellate Ganglion Blockade in Patients With Electrical Storm.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Tian, E. Wittwer, S. Kapa, Christopher J. McLeod, P. Xiao, P. Noseworthy, S. Mulpuru, A. Deshmukh, Hon-chi Lee, M. Ackerman, S. Asirvatham, T. Munger, Xingpeng Liu, P. Friedman, Y. Cha\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nPercutaneous stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) has been used for drug-refractory electrical storm due to ventricular arrhythmia (VA); however, the effects and long-term outcomes have not been well studied.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThis study included 30 consecutive patients who had drug-refractory electrical storm and underwent percutaneous SGB between October 1, 2013, and March 31, 2018. Bupivacaine, alone or combined with lidocaine, was injected into the neck with good local anesthetic spread in the vicinity of the left stellate ganglion (n=15) or both stellate ganglia (n=15). Data were collected for patient clinical characteristics, immediate and long-term outcomes, and procedure-related complications.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nClinical characteristics included age, 58±14 years; men, 73.3%; and left ventricular ejection fraction, 34±16%. At 24 hours, 60% of patients were free of VA. Patients whose VA was controlled had a lower hospital mortality rate than patients whose VA continued (5.6% versus 50.0%; P=0.009). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interrogation showed a significant 92% reduction in VA episodes from 26±41 to 2±4 in the 72 hours after SGB (P<0.001). Patients who died during the same hospitalization (n=7) were more likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy (100% versus 43.5%; P=0.03) and recurrent VA within 24 hours (85.7% versus 26.1%; P=0.009). There were no procedure-related major complications.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nSGB effectively attenuated electrical storm in more than half of patients without procedure-related complications. Percutaneous SGB may be considered for stabilizing ventricular rhythm in patients for whom other therapies have failed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"56\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56
摘要
背景:经皮星状神经节阻滞(SGB)已被用于治疗室性心律失常(VA)引起的药物难治性电风暴;然而,其影响和长期结果尚未得到很好的研究。方法本研究纳入了2013年10月1日至2018年3月31日期间连续30例难治性电风暴患者经皮SGB。布比卡因单用或联用利多卡因颈部注射,局部麻醉良好,分布于左侧星状神经节附近(n=15)或双侧星状神经节附近(n=15)。收集患者临床特征、近期和长期结果以及手术相关并发症的数据。结果年龄:58±14岁;男性,73.3%;左室射血分数,34±16%。在24小时内,60%的患者没有VA。VA得到控制的患者的医院死亡率低于VA继续存在的患者(5.6%对50.0%;P = 0.009)。植入式心律转复除颤器审讯显示,在SGB后72小时内,VA发作从26±41次减少到2±4次,显著减少92% (P<0.001)。在同一住院期间死亡的患者(n=7)患缺血性心肌病的可能性更大(100%比43.5%;P=0.03)和24小时内VA复发(85.7% vs 26.1%;P = 0.009)。无手术相关的主要并发症。结论ssgb有效地减弱了半数以上患者的电风暴,无手术相关并发症。经皮SGB可用于稳定其他治疗失败的患者的心室节律。
Effective Use of Percutaneous Stellate Ganglion Blockade in Patients With Electrical Storm.
BACKGROUND
Percutaneous stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) has been used for drug-refractory electrical storm due to ventricular arrhythmia (VA); however, the effects and long-term outcomes have not been well studied.
METHODS
This study included 30 consecutive patients who had drug-refractory electrical storm and underwent percutaneous SGB between October 1, 2013, and March 31, 2018. Bupivacaine, alone or combined with lidocaine, was injected into the neck with good local anesthetic spread in the vicinity of the left stellate ganglion (n=15) or both stellate ganglia (n=15). Data were collected for patient clinical characteristics, immediate and long-term outcomes, and procedure-related complications.
RESULTS
Clinical characteristics included age, 58±14 years; men, 73.3%; and left ventricular ejection fraction, 34±16%. At 24 hours, 60% of patients were free of VA. Patients whose VA was controlled had a lower hospital mortality rate than patients whose VA continued (5.6% versus 50.0%; P=0.009). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interrogation showed a significant 92% reduction in VA episodes from 26±41 to 2±4 in the 72 hours after SGB (P<0.001). Patients who died during the same hospitalization (n=7) were more likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy (100% versus 43.5%; P=0.03) and recurrent VA within 24 hours (85.7% versus 26.1%; P=0.009). There were no procedure-related major complications.
CONCLUSIONS
SGB effectively attenuated electrical storm in more than half of patients without procedure-related complications. Percutaneous SGB may be considered for stabilizing ventricular rhythm in patients for whom other therapies have failed.