论信息的价值

Stanley Ozog
{"title":"论信息的价值","authors":"Stanley Ozog","doi":"10.1002/asi.4630300511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the definition of information acquisition as the reduction in uncertainty, the concept of ignorance is defined as the state of uncertainty. Two basic types of ignorance are then defined as substitutes for information: guessing and belief. Two types of frequency distribution are presented as the most general dichotomy that can be applied to all possible types of frequency distribution and from them two limits are deduced between which all types of frequency distribution can be placed. Using games of chance—roulette and horse racing—as representatives of two basic types of frequency distribution, the comparison is presented of different results that can be theoretically obtained by the informed, the guessing, and the belief approaches. The value of information is a function of the type of frequency distribution of data that form its contents. The limits established for the types of frequency distribution are also boundary conditions for information value from nil to some finite number that depends also on the number of alternatives involved in case of a discrete set, and on range size, accuracy of measurement, and its precision in case of continuous parameters.","PeriodicalId":50013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","volume":"2 1","pages":"310-315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Value of Information\",\"authors\":\"Stanley Ozog\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/asi.4630300511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the definition of information acquisition as the reduction in uncertainty, the concept of ignorance is defined as the state of uncertainty. Two basic types of ignorance are then defined as substitutes for information: guessing and belief. Two types of frequency distribution are presented as the most general dichotomy that can be applied to all possible types of frequency distribution and from them two limits are deduced between which all types of frequency distribution can be placed. Using games of chance—roulette and horse racing—as representatives of two basic types of frequency distribution, the comparison is presented of different results that can be theoretically obtained by the informed, the guessing, and the belief approaches. The value of information is a function of the type of frequency distribution of data that form its contents. The limits established for the types of frequency distribution are also boundary conditions for information value from nil to some finite number that depends also on the number of alternatives involved in case of a discrete set, and on range size, accuracy of measurement, and its precision in case of continuous parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"310-315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630300511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630300511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在将信息获取定义为减少不确定性的基础上,将无知的概念定义为不确定状态。两种基本类型的无知被定义为信息的替代品:猜测和信念。两种类型的频率分布作为最一般的二分法,可以应用于所有可能类型的频率分布,并从它们推导出两个极限,所有类型的频率分布可以放置在这两个极限之间。以机会轮盘赌和赛马作为两种基本频率分布类型的代表,比较了知情法、猜测法和信念法在理论上可以获得的不同结果。信息的价值是构成其内容的数据的频率分布类型的函数。为频率分布类型建立的限制也是信息值从零到某个有限数的边界条件,这也取决于在离散集的情况下所涉及的备选方案的数量,以及在连续参数的情况下的范围大小,测量精度及其精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Value of Information
Based on the definition of information acquisition as the reduction in uncertainty, the concept of ignorance is defined as the state of uncertainty. Two basic types of ignorance are then defined as substitutes for information: guessing and belief. Two types of frequency distribution are presented as the most general dichotomy that can be applied to all possible types of frequency distribution and from them two limits are deduced between which all types of frequency distribution can be placed. Using games of chance—roulette and horse racing—as representatives of two basic types of frequency distribution, the comparison is presented of different results that can be theoretically obtained by the informed, the guessing, and the belief approaches. The value of information is a function of the type of frequency distribution of data that form its contents. The limits established for the types of frequency distribution are also boundary conditions for information value from nil to some finite number that depends also on the number of alternatives involved in case of a discrete set, and on range size, accuracy of measurement, and its precision in case of continuous parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.5 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信