第四代头孢菌素:抗菌活性和光谱定义,以头孢匹罗为例

Helio S. Sader, Ronald N. Jones
{"title":"第四代头孢菌素:抗菌活性和光谱定义,以头孢匹罗为例","authors":"Helio S. Sader,&nbsp;Ronald N. Jones","doi":"10.1016/S0738-1751(10)80003-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The antimicrobial activity of cefpirome against routine clinical isolates and those organisms resistant to a “third-generation” cephalosporin was highly consistent within a nation (US.) and among various countries. It demonstrated reasonable activity against ceftazidime-resistant <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em> and excellent activity against staphylococci while maintaining usable potency against P. <em>aeruginosa</em> (MIC<sub>50</sub>, 4 μg/ml).<sup>12</sup> The association of relative stability to Bush group 1 β-lactamases, lower enzyme affinity, and increased penetration through the bacterial outer membrane appears to be responsible for the higher activity of “fourth-generation” cephalosporins against aerobic Gram-negative bacteria.<sup>5,8,16,23,25,28</sup> In addition, cefpirome has achieved a more balanced spectrum, with activity against important contemporary Grampositive cocci, a potency comparable to that of a “first-generation cephalosporin.<sup>2,27,30</sup> Its in vitro activity against oxacillin-resistant staphylococci could be explained by a higher affinity for the staphylococcal PBPs, including PBP2a,<sup>27</sup> however, the clinical significance of this finding has yet to be demonstrated. “Fourth-generation” compounds such as cefpirome have more limited activity against Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli<sup>15</sup> compared to the “third-generation” compounds.</p><p>In vitro studies have shown that cefpirome has potent activity against <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em> and staphylococci strains resistant to the “third-generation” cephalosporin, ceftazidime. Moreover, pharmacokinetics studies in healthy volunteers showed encouraging results allowing for twice daily dosing.<sup>24</sup> Further in vitro and in vivo investigations should be performed to determine the role of this and other similar compounds in the treatment of infections caused by these multiresistant bacteria. Combination chemotherapy with aminoglycosides or glycopeptides or metronidazole maybe required to eradicate some emerging clinical pathogens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100101,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobic Newsletter","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 9-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0738-1751(10)80003-6","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The fourth-generation cephalosporins: Antimicrobial activity and spectrum definitions using cefpirome as an example\",\"authors\":\"Helio S. Sader,&nbsp;Ronald N. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0738-1751(10)80003-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The antimicrobial activity of cefpirome against routine clinical isolates and those organisms resistant to a “third-generation” cephalosporin was highly consistent within a nation (US.) and among various countries. It demonstrated reasonable activity against ceftazidime-resistant <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em> and excellent activity against staphylococci while maintaining usable potency against P. <em>aeruginosa</em> (MIC<sub>50</sub>, 4 μg/ml).<sup>12</sup> The association of relative stability to Bush group 1 β-lactamases, lower enzyme affinity, and increased penetration through the bacterial outer membrane appears to be responsible for the higher activity of “fourth-generation” cephalosporins against aerobic Gram-negative bacteria.<sup>5,8,16,23,25,28</sup> In addition, cefpirome has achieved a more balanced spectrum, with activity against important contemporary Grampositive cocci, a potency comparable to that of a “first-generation cephalosporin.<sup>2,27,30</sup> Its in vitro activity against oxacillin-resistant staphylococci could be explained by a higher affinity for the staphylococcal PBPs, including PBP2a,<sup>27</sup> however, the clinical significance of this finding has yet to be demonstrated. “Fourth-generation” compounds such as cefpirome have more limited activity against Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli<sup>15</sup> compared to the “third-generation” compounds.</p><p>In vitro studies have shown that cefpirome has potent activity against <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em> and staphylococci strains resistant to the “third-generation” cephalosporin, ceftazidime. Moreover, pharmacokinetics studies in healthy volunteers showed encouraging results allowing for twice daily dosing.<sup>24</sup> Further in vitro and in vivo investigations should be performed to determine the role of this and other similar compounds in the treatment of infections caused by these multiresistant bacteria. Combination chemotherapy with aminoglycosides or glycopeptides or metronidazole maybe required to eradicate some emerging clinical pathogens.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobic Newsletter\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 9-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0738-1751(10)80003-6\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobic Newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738175110800036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobic Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738175110800036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

头孢匹罗对常规临床分离株和对“第三代”头孢菌素耐药的微生物的抗菌活性在一个国家(美国)和各国之间高度一致。对头孢他啶耐药肠杆菌科细菌有较好的抗菌活性,对葡萄球菌有较好的抗菌活性,对铜绿假单胞菌(P. aeruginosa)有较好的抗菌活性(MIC50, 4 μg/ml)“第四代”头孢菌素对需氧革兰氏阴性菌具有较高的活性,其相对稳定性与Bush组1 β-内酰胺酶、较低的酶亲和力和通过细菌外膜的渗透性增加有关。5,8,16,23,25,28此外,头孢匹罗已经实现了更平衡的光谱,对重要的当代革兰氏阳性球菌具有活性,其效力可与“第一代头孢菌素”相媲美。2,27,30其对耐氧西林葡萄球菌的体外活性可以通过对葡萄球菌PBPs(包括PBP2a)的较高亲和力来解释,然而,这一发现的临床意义尚未得到证实。与“第三代”化合物相比,“第四代”化合物如头孢匹罗对革兰氏阴性厌氧菌的活性更有限。体外研究表明,头孢匹罗对对“第三代”头孢菌素头孢他啶耐药的肠杆菌科和葡萄球菌菌株具有强效活性。此外,在健康志愿者中进行的药代动力学研究显示,允许每日两次给药的结果令人鼓舞应该进行进一步的体外和体内研究,以确定这种和其他类似化合物在治疗这些多重耐药细菌引起的感染中的作用。可能需要氨基糖苷或糖肽或甲硝唑联合化疗来根除一些新出现的临床病原体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The fourth-generation cephalosporins: Antimicrobial activity and spectrum definitions using cefpirome as an example

The antimicrobial activity of cefpirome against routine clinical isolates and those organisms resistant to a “third-generation” cephalosporin was highly consistent within a nation (US.) and among various countries. It demonstrated reasonable activity against ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and excellent activity against staphylococci while maintaining usable potency against P. aeruginosa (MIC50, 4 μg/ml).12 The association of relative stability to Bush group 1 β-lactamases, lower enzyme affinity, and increased penetration through the bacterial outer membrane appears to be responsible for the higher activity of “fourth-generation” cephalosporins against aerobic Gram-negative bacteria.5,8,16,23,25,28 In addition, cefpirome has achieved a more balanced spectrum, with activity against important contemporary Grampositive cocci, a potency comparable to that of a “first-generation cephalosporin.2,27,30 Its in vitro activity against oxacillin-resistant staphylococci could be explained by a higher affinity for the staphylococcal PBPs, including PBP2a,27 however, the clinical significance of this finding has yet to be demonstrated. “Fourth-generation” compounds such as cefpirome have more limited activity against Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli15 compared to the “third-generation” compounds.

In vitro studies have shown that cefpirome has potent activity against Enterobacteriaceae and staphylococci strains resistant to the “third-generation” cephalosporin, ceftazidime. Moreover, pharmacokinetics studies in healthy volunteers showed encouraging results allowing for twice daily dosing.24 Further in vitro and in vivo investigations should be performed to determine the role of this and other similar compounds in the treatment of infections caused by these multiresistant bacteria. Combination chemotherapy with aminoglycosides or glycopeptides or metronidazole maybe required to eradicate some emerging clinical pathogens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信