分流是改善高危青年服务利用的途径。

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Psychology Public Policy and Law Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-13 DOI:10.1037/law0000325
James G Barrett, Michael Flores, Esther Lee, Brian Mullin, Chloe Greenbaum, Erika A Pruett, Benjamin Lê Cook
{"title":"分流是改善高危青年服务利用的途径。","authors":"James G Barrett, Michael Flores, Esther Lee, Brian Mullin, Chloe Greenbaum, Erika A Pruett, Benjamin Lê Cook","doi":"10.1037/law0000325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the high rates of mental illness among youth in the juvenile justice system, many justice-involved youth do not receive adequate behavioral health services. We examined differences in health service utilization outcomes between youth who were diverted through a community-based, precomplaint program (Safety Net; <i>n</i> = 41), and youth with juvenile justice involvement in neighboring cities (<i>n</i> = 154). Individual arrest and health care records were combined to evaluate the rate of health care service utilization before and after initial police contact. A difference-in-differences approach with propensity score weighting was used to evaluate the impact of Safety Net on health service use, including inpatient, outpatient, emergency department (ED), and primary care visits. Compared to their nondiverted counterparts, Safety Net youth had a significant increase in psychiatric outpatient visits (average treatment effect [ATE] of 26%; <i>p</i> < .05) and psychiatric outpatient and primary care visits among those with a diagnosed mental illness (ATE of 19% and 12%, respectively); <i>p</i> < .05). There were no significant differences in ED or hospitalization outcomes. Results suggest that precomplaint diversion through Safety Net fosters access to outpatient behavioral health and primary care services that address the underlying issues that put youth in contact with police.</p>","PeriodicalId":51463,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Public Policy and Law","volume":"31 1","pages":"179-187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversion as a Pathway to Improving Service Utilization Among At-Risk Youth.\",\"authors\":\"James G Barrett, Michael Flores, Esther Lee, Brian Mullin, Chloe Greenbaum, Erika A Pruett, Benjamin Lê Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/law0000325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the high rates of mental illness among youth in the juvenile justice system, many justice-involved youth do not receive adequate behavioral health services. We examined differences in health service utilization outcomes between youth who were diverted through a community-based, precomplaint program (Safety Net; <i>n</i> = 41), and youth with juvenile justice involvement in neighboring cities (<i>n</i> = 154). Individual arrest and health care records were combined to evaluate the rate of health care service utilization before and after initial police contact. A difference-in-differences approach with propensity score weighting was used to evaluate the impact of Safety Net on health service use, including inpatient, outpatient, emergency department (ED), and primary care visits. Compared to their nondiverted counterparts, Safety Net youth had a significant increase in psychiatric outpatient visits (average treatment effect [ATE] of 26%; <i>p</i> < .05) and psychiatric outpatient and primary care visits among those with a diagnosed mental illness (ATE of 19% and 12%, respectively); <i>p</i> < .05). There were no significant differences in ED or hospitalization outcomes. Results suggest that precomplaint diversion through Safety Net fosters access to outpatient behavioral health and primary care services that address the underlying issues that put youth in contact with police.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Public Policy and Law\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"179-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636642/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Public Policy and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000325\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Public Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000325","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管青少年司法系统中的青少年患精神疾病的比例很高,但许多涉及司法的青少年并没有得到适当的行为健康服务。我们检查了通过基于社区的投诉前计划转移的青少年之间卫生服务利用结果的差异(安全网;N = 41),邻市少年司法涉事青少年(N = 154)。将个人逮捕记录和卫生保健记录结合起来,评估初次与警察接触前后卫生保健服务的使用率。采用倾向评分加权的差异中差异法来评估安全网对卫生服务使用的影响,包括住院、门诊、急诊科和初级保健就诊。与未被转移的青少年相比,安全网青年的精神科门诊访问量显著增加(平均治疗效果[ATE]为26%;p < 0.05)和精神科门诊和初级保健就诊(ATE分别为19%和12%);P < 0.05)。ED和住院治疗结果没有显著差异。结果表明,通过安全网进行的投诉前转移促进了获得门诊行为健康和初级保健服务的机会,这些服务解决了使青少年与警察接触的潜在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diversion as a Pathway to Improving Service Utilization Among At-Risk Youth.

Despite the high rates of mental illness among youth in the juvenile justice system, many justice-involved youth do not receive adequate behavioral health services. We examined differences in health service utilization outcomes between youth who were diverted through a community-based, precomplaint program (Safety Net; n = 41), and youth with juvenile justice involvement in neighboring cities (n = 154). Individual arrest and health care records were combined to evaluate the rate of health care service utilization before and after initial police contact. A difference-in-differences approach with propensity score weighting was used to evaluate the impact of Safety Net on health service use, including inpatient, outpatient, emergency department (ED), and primary care visits. Compared to their nondiverted counterparts, Safety Net youth had a significant increase in psychiatric outpatient visits (average treatment effect [ATE] of 26%; p < .05) and psychiatric outpatient and primary care visits among those with a diagnosed mental illness (ATE of 19% and 12%, respectively); p < .05). There were no significant differences in ED or hospitalization outcomes. Results suggest that precomplaint diversion through Safety Net fosters access to outpatient behavioral health and primary care services that address the underlying issues that put youth in contact with police.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law ® provides a forum in which to critically evaluate the contributions of psychology and related disciplines (hereinafter psychology) to public policy and legal issues, and vice versa. It is read by legal scholars and professionals and public policy analysts as well as psychology researchers and practitioners working at the interface of the three fields. The journal publishes theoretical and empirical articles that critically evaluate the contributions and potential contributions of psychology to public policy and legal issues;assess the desirability of different public policy and legal alternatives in light of the scientific knowledge base in psychology;articulate research needs that address public policy and legal issues for which there is currently insufficient theoretical and empirical knowledge;present empirical work that makes a significant contribution to the application of psychological knowledge to public policy or the law; andexamine public policy and legal issues relating to the conduct of psychology and related disciplines (e.g., human subjects, protection policies; informed consent procedures).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信