债务的代理成本:一个供应商融资的案例

J. Chod
{"title":"债务的代理成本:一个供应商融资的案例","authors":"J. Chod","doi":"10.1561/0200000061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we first show how debt financing distorts the inventory decision of a multi–product retail firm. Protected by limited liability, a debt–financed retailer seeks risk by favoring items with a low salvage value, those with a high profit margin, and those that represent a large share of the total inventory investment. Second, we demonstrate that in many cases, this distortion can be avoided by using supplier financing. A supplier who automatically observes the retailer’s order quantities, can deter risk–seeking behavior on the part of the retailer with the threat of stricter credit terms. This provides suppliers with a financing advantage over banks, which can monitor inventory only at a cost.","PeriodicalId":39990,"journal":{"name":"Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"220-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agency Cost of Debt: A Case for Supplier Financing\",\"authors\":\"J. Chod\",\"doi\":\"10.1561/0200000061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we first show how debt financing distorts the inventory decision of a multi–product retail firm. Protected by limited liability, a debt–financed retailer seeks risk by favoring items with a low salvage value, those with a high profit margin, and those that represent a large share of the total inventory investment. Second, we demonstrate that in many cases, this distortion can be avoided by using supplier financing. A supplier who automatically observes the retailer’s order quantities, can deter risk–seeking behavior on the part of the retailer with the threat of stricter credit terms. This provides suppliers with a financing advantage over banks, which can monitor inventory only at a cost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"220-236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1561/0200000061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/0200000061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在本文中,我们首先展示了债务融资如何扭曲多产品零售企业的库存决策。在有限责任的保护下,债务融资的零售商寻求风险,青睐那些残值低、利润率高的商品,以及那些占总库存投资很大份额的商品。其次,我们证明,在许多情况下,这种扭曲可以通过使用供应商融资来避免。供应商自动观察零售商的订购数量,可以用更严格的信用条款来威胁零售商寻求风险的行为。这为供应商提供了相对于银行的融资优势,银行只能以一定的成本监控库存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agency Cost of Debt: A Case for Supplier Financing
In this paper, we first show how debt financing distorts the inventory decision of a multi–product retail firm. Protected by limited liability, a debt–financed retailer seeks risk by favoring items with a low salvage value, those with a high profit margin, and those that represent a large share of the total inventory investment. Second, we demonstrate that in many cases, this distortion can be avoided by using supplier financing. A supplier who automatically observes the retailer’s order quantities, can deter risk–seeking behavior on the part of the retailer with the threat of stricter credit terms. This provides suppliers with a financing advantage over banks, which can monitor inventory only at a cost.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management
Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management Decision Sciences-Management Science and Operations Research
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信