做出更好的基于证据的决策的认知分析

Chris Asakiewicz
{"title":"做出更好的基于证据的决策的认知分析","authors":"Chris Asakiewicz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2965767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The actions associated with business decisions are guided by a range of variables, that include: opportunities, funding types, customer categories, competencies, proposal status, resource feasibility, technical feasibility, capability increase, risk level and commitment. \nThe analysis of these decision variables or more likely the data associated with them is based on using descriptive, predictive, or prescriptive analytics as a means of “searching for answers” to the business problems and issues confronting the enterprise. Cognitive analytics embodies a fourth area of decision support that facilitates the analysis of structured and unstructured data sources and the use of natural language processing, learning and reasoning capabilities to enhance hypothesis generation. In short, cognitive analytics enables the enterprise to “ask the right questions” surrounding the evidence. \nThis research highlights the impact of cognitive analytics in making evidence-based decision actions – specifically by modeling “what if” scenarios concerning the impact of resource and schedule on project risk associated with the development of a new product using IBM SPSS Modeler and IBM Watson Analytics.","PeriodicalId":23435,"journal":{"name":"UNSW Business School Research Paper Series","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Analytics for Making Better Evidence-Based Decisions\",\"authors\":\"Chris Asakiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2965767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The actions associated with business decisions are guided by a range of variables, that include: opportunities, funding types, customer categories, competencies, proposal status, resource feasibility, technical feasibility, capability increase, risk level and commitment. \\nThe analysis of these decision variables or more likely the data associated with them is based on using descriptive, predictive, or prescriptive analytics as a means of “searching for answers” to the business problems and issues confronting the enterprise. Cognitive analytics embodies a fourth area of decision support that facilitates the analysis of structured and unstructured data sources and the use of natural language processing, learning and reasoning capabilities to enhance hypothesis generation. In short, cognitive analytics enables the enterprise to “ask the right questions” surrounding the evidence. \\nThis research highlights the impact of cognitive analytics in making evidence-based decision actions – specifically by modeling “what if” scenarios concerning the impact of resource and schedule on project risk associated with the development of a new product using IBM SPSS Modeler and IBM Watson Analytics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNSW Business School Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNSW Business School Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2965767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNSW Business School Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2965767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与业务决策相关的行动由一系列变量指导,这些变量包括:机会、资金类型、客户类别、能力、提案状态、资源可行性、技术可行性、能力增加、风险水平和承诺。对这些决策变量的分析,或者更可能是对与它们相关的数据的分析,是基于使用描述性的、预测性的或规定性的分析,作为对企业面临的业务问题和问题“寻找答案”的一种手段。认知分析体现了决策支持的第四个领域,它促进了对结构化和非结构化数据源的分析,并使用自然语言处理、学习和推理能力来增强假设生成。简而言之,认知分析使企业能够围绕证据“提出正确的问题”。这项研究强调了认知分析在制定基于证据的决策行动中的影响——特别是通过使用IBM SPSS Modeler和IBM Watson analytics对与新产品开发相关的资源和进度对项目风险的影响进行建模的“如果”情景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive Analytics for Making Better Evidence-Based Decisions
The actions associated with business decisions are guided by a range of variables, that include: opportunities, funding types, customer categories, competencies, proposal status, resource feasibility, technical feasibility, capability increase, risk level and commitment. The analysis of these decision variables or more likely the data associated with them is based on using descriptive, predictive, or prescriptive analytics as a means of “searching for answers” to the business problems and issues confronting the enterprise. Cognitive analytics embodies a fourth area of decision support that facilitates the analysis of structured and unstructured data sources and the use of natural language processing, learning and reasoning capabilities to enhance hypothesis generation. In short, cognitive analytics enables the enterprise to “ask the right questions” surrounding the evidence. This research highlights the impact of cognitive analytics in making evidence-based decision actions – specifically by modeling “what if” scenarios concerning the impact of resource and schedule on project risk associated with the development of a new product using IBM SPSS Modeler and IBM Watson Analytics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信