{"title":"利用高电流电子束产生臭氧","authors":"Y. Kotov, S. Sokovnin, A. Filatov","doi":"10.1109/PPC.1995.599785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Calculations and experiments have shown that the repetitive high-current electron beam (HCEB) generation of ozone from the air is an order of magnitude more favorable energetically than producing ozone by a persistent electron beam. But it is less advantageous than the production of ozone by the electric-discharge method (w/sub sp//spl sim/13 kw h/kg), if one takes into account the efficiency of converting energy into a beam (about 50%). However, specific power intakes fall as the electron energy rises because of an increase in the free path length of electrons in the air. Calculations for RUSLAN (E=700 keV, I=5000 A, t=50 ns), and SIBERIA (E=1000 keV, I=5000 A, t=50 ns) accelerators provide evidence that these machines are becoming competitive in power intake with electric-discharge accelerators. Virtues of the ozone production process involving the use of a repetitive accelerator include the simplicity in design, low cost, and reliability of the air oxygen-to-ozone-conversion unit.","PeriodicalId":11163,"journal":{"name":"Digest of Technical Papers. Tenth IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a high-current electron beam to generate ozone\",\"authors\":\"Y. Kotov, S. Sokovnin, A. Filatov\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PPC.1995.599785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Calculations and experiments have shown that the repetitive high-current electron beam (HCEB) generation of ozone from the air is an order of magnitude more favorable energetically than producing ozone by a persistent electron beam. But it is less advantageous than the production of ozone by the electric-discharge method (w/sub sp//spl sim/13 kw h/kg), if one takes into account the efficiency of converting energy into a beam (about 50%). However, specific power intakes fall as the electron energy rises because of an increase in the free path length of electrons in the air. Calculations for RUSLAN (E=700 keV, I=5000 A, t=50 ns), and SIBERIA (E=1000 keV, I=5000 A, t=50 ns) accelerators provide evidence that these machines are becoming competitive in power intake with electric-discharge accelerators. Virtues of the ozone production process involving the use of a repetitive accelerator include the simplicity in design, low cost, and reliability of the air oxygen-to-ozone-conversion unit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digest of Technical Papers. Tenth IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digest of Technical Papers. Tenth IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PPC.1995.599785\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digest of Technical Papers. Tenth IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PPC.1995.599785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
计算和实验表明,重复大电流电子束(HCEB)从空气中产生臭氧在能量上比持续电子束产生臭氧有利一个数量级。但是,如果考虑到将能量转换成光束的效率(约50%),它不如电放电法(w/sub sp//spl sim/13 kw h/kg)产生臭氧有利。然而,由于电子在空气中的自由路径长度的增加,电子能量的上升导致了比功率的下降。对RUSLAN (E=700 keV, I=5000 A, t=50 ns)和西伯利亚(E=1000 keV, I=5000 A, t=50 ns)加速器的计算提供了证据,证明这些机器在功率吸收方面与放电加速器具有竞争力。使用重复加速器的臭氧生产过程的优点包括设计简单、成本低和空气氧-臭氧转换装置的可靠性。
Using a high-current electron beam to generate ozone
Calculations and experiments have shown that the repetitive high-current electron beam (HCEB) generation of ozone from the air is an order of magnitude more favorable energetically than producing ozone by a persistent electron beam. But it is less advantageous than the production of ozone by the electric-discharge method (w/sub sp//spl sim/13 kw h/kg), if one takes into account the efficiency of converting energy into a beam (about 50%). However, specific power intakes fall as the electron energy rises because of an increase in the free path length of electrons in the air. Calculations for RUSLAN (E=700 keV, I=5000 A, t=50 ns), and SIBERIA (E=1000 keV, I=5000 A, t=50 ns) accelerators provide evidence that these machines are becoming competitive in power intake with electric-discharge accelerators. Virtues of the ozone production process involving the use of a repetitive accelerator include the simplicity in design, low cost, and reliability of the air oxygen-to-ozone-conversion unit.