设计在公共管理中的应用:以文献回顾探讨设计的艺术现状

IF 4.3 2区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Margot Hermus, A. Buuren, V. Bekkers
{"title":"设计在公共管理中的应用:以文献回顾探讨设计的艺术现状","authors":"Margot Hermus, A. Buuren, V. Bekkers","doi":"10.1332/030557319X15579230420126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The attention for applying design-oriented approaches in public administration has increased \nsignificantly. Applying design is seen as a promising way to deal with wicked problems and create \nmore responsive policies and services. We aim to contribute to the debate on the value of design \nfor public administration and the development of the latter into a design science by conducting \na systematic literature review into the empirical applications of design. We analyse the goals, \nprocesses and outcomes of 92 empirical studies. Based upon this we distil six design approaches, \nvarying from traditional scientific and informational approaches to innovative, user-driven and thus \nmore ‘inspirational’ approaches. The more traditional (science-driven) approaches still dominate the \nfield. The impact of these types of studies is correspondingly low. We argue that further developing \nand refining the whole range of design approaches can foster both the scientific rigour and the \nsocietal relevance of a design-oriented public administration.","PeriodicalId":47631,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Politics","volume":"20 1","pages":"21-48"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying design in public administration: a literature review to explore the state of the art\",\"authors\":\"Margot Hermus, A. Buuren, V. Bekkers\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/030557319X15579230420126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The attention for applying design-oriented approaches in public administration has increased \\nsignificantly. Applying design is seen as a promising way to deal with wicked problems and create \\nmore responsive policies and services. We aim to contribute to the debate on the value of design \\nfor public administration and the development of the latter into a design science by conducting \\na systematic literature review into the empirical applications of design. We analyse the goals, \\nprocesses and outcomes of 92 empirical studies. Based upon this we distil six design approaches, \\nvarying from traditional scientific and informational approaches to innovative, user-driven and thus \\nmore ‘inspirational’ approaches. The more traditional (science-driven) approaches still dominate the \\nfield. The impact of these types of studies is correspondingly low. We argue that further developing \\nand refining the whole range of design approaches can foster both the scientific rigour and the \\nsocietal relevance of a design-oriented public administration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy and Politics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"21-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy and Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420126\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

对在公共行政中应用面向设计的办法的注意已大大增加。应用设计被认为是处理棘手问题和创建更具响应性的政策和服务的有希望的方法。我们的目标是通过对设计的实证应用进行系统的文献综述,促进关于设计对公共行政的价值的辩论,并将后者发展为一门设计科学。我们分析了92项实证研究的目标、过程和结果。在此基础上,我们提炼了六种设计方法,从传统的科学和信息方法到创新的,用户驱动的,因此更“鼓舞人心”的方法。更传统的(科学驱动的)方法仍然主导着这个领域。这类研究的影响相对较低。我们认为,进一步发展和完善整个设计方法的范围可以促进科学的严谨性和社会相关性的设计为导向的公共管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying design in public administration: a literature review to explore the state of the art
The attention for applying design-oriented approaches in public administration has increased significantly. Applying design is seen as a promising way to deal with wicked problems and create more responsive policies and services. We aim to contribute to the debate on the value of design for public administration and the development of the latter into a design science by conducting a systematic literature review into the empirical applications of design. We analyse the goals, processes and outcomes of 92 empirical studies. Based upon this we distil six design approaches, varying from traditional scientific and informational approaches to innovative, user-driven and thus more ‘inspirational’ approaches. The more traditional (science-driven) approaches still dominate the field. The impact of these types of studies is correspondingly low. We argue that further developing and refining the whole range of design approaches can foster both the scientific rigour and the societal relevance of a design-oriented public administration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信