教育的因果回报:德国的实证调查

Q1 Mathematics
Anton Flossmann, W. Pohlmeier
{"title":"教育的因果回报:德国的实证调查","authors":"Anton Flossmann, W. Pohlmeier","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.917325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper surveys the empirical evidence on causal effects of education on earnings for Germany and compares alternative studies in the light of their underlying identifying assumptions. We work out the different assumptions taken by various studies, which lead to rather different interpretations of the estimated causal effect. In particular, we are interested in the question to what extend causal return estimates are informative regarding educational policy advice. Despite the substantial methodological differences, we have to conclude that the empirical findings for Germany are quite robust and do not deviate substantially from each other. This also holds for the few studies which rely on ignorability conditions, regardless of whether they use educational attainment as a continuous treatment variable or as a discrete treatment indicator. Own estimates based on the matching approach indicate that the selection into upper secondary schooling is suboptimal","PeriodicalId":36872,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics","volume":"41 1","pages":"6-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal Returns to Education: A Survey on Empirical Evidence for Germany\",\"authors\":\"Anton Flossmann, W. Pohlmeier\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.917325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper surveys the empirical evidence on causal effects of education on earnings for Germany and compares alternative studies in the light of their underlying identifying assumptions. We work out the different assumptions taken by various studies, which lead to rather different interpretations of the estimated causal effect. In particular, we are interested in the question to what extend causal return estimates are informative regarding educational policy advice. Despite the substantial methodological differences, we have to conclude that the empirical findings for Germany are quite robust and do not deviate substantially from each other. This also holds for the few studies which rely on ignorability conditions, regardless of whether they use educational attainment as a continuous treatment variable or as a discrete treatment indicator. Own estimates based on the matching approach indicate that the selection into upper secondary schooling is suboptimal\",\"PeriodicalId\":36872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"6-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.917325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.917325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

本文调查了教育对德国收入的因果影响的经验证据,并根据其潜在的识别假设比较了其他研究。我们计算出各种研究采用的不同假设,这些假设导致对估计的因果关系的不同解释。特别是,我们感兴趣的问题是因果回报估计在多大程度上对教育政策建议提供信息。尽管方法上存在巨大差异,但我们必须得出结论,德国的实证研究结果相当稳健,并且彼此之间没有很大的偏差。这也适用于少数依赖于可忽略性条件的研究,无论他们是将教育程度作为连续治疗变量还是作为离散治疗指标。基于匹配方法的个人估计表明,进入高中教育的选择是次优的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causal Returns to Education: A Survey on Empirical Evidence for Germany
This paper surveys the empirical evidence on causal effects of education on earnings for Germany and compares alternative studies in the light of their underlying identifying assumptions. We work out the different assumptions taken by various studies, which lead to rather different interpretations of the estimated causal effect. In particular, we are interested in the question to what extend causal return estimates are informative regarding educational policy advice. Despite the substantial methodological differences, we have to conclude that the empirical findings for Germany are quite robust and do not deviate substantially from each other. This also holds for the few studies which rely on ignorability conditions, regardless of whether they use educational attainment as a continuous treatment variable or as a discrete treatment indicator. Own estimates based on the matching approach indicate that the selection into upper secondary schooling is suboptimal
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics
Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信