水力压裂井套管连接评价方法研究

K. Hamilton, P. Pattillo
{"title":"水力压裂井套管连接评价方法研究","authors":"K. Hamilton, P. Pattillo","doi":"10.2118/194369-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Hydraulic fracturing as a means to stimulate production has become an effective way to extract oil and gas from low-porosity, low-permeability, hydrocarbon-bearing formations. The technology used in support of hydraulic fracturing is evolving at a fast rate, which has enabled operators worldwide to achieve improved recovery in increasingly complex well environments.\n The well designs and completion strategies associated with hydraulic fracturing come with a unique set of challenges. During well construction, the long lateral sections of extended-reach wells may require the production (or intermediate) casing to be rotated and pushed through build sections of relatively high curvature (greater than 10° per 100 feet or 30 meters); furthermore, some operators rotate the casing during cementing to improve cement quality. This rotation can subject the casing connections in the build section to a high number of rotating-bending load cycles. This cyclic loading can result in high stresses in the thread roots of the casing connections, which may lead to localized yielding of the material and potential structural failure. The hydraulic fracturing process itself subjects the production casing to rapid increases in internal pressure to high magnitudes, which will result in cyclic pressure loading for wells with multiple stages. Given these considerations, casing connections that are used in hydraulically fractured wells can be subjected to significant cyclic loading before the well is produced, and this loading may have an impact on the overall casing connection sealing and structural capacity in subsequent well operations.\n In 2015 the American Petroleum Institute (API) published the first edition of Recommended Practice 100-1, Hydraulic Fracturing – Well Integrity and Fracture Containment, to provide the industry with guidelines and considerations for hydraulically fractured well designs, including recommendations on casing string design. This document does not include specific criteria for how to assess the performance of equipment. Since current connection evaluation protocols such as API RP 5C5 and ISO/PAS 12835 do not target the types of loading that are commonly observed in hydraulically fractured wells, connections that are evaluated under these protocols may not be suitable for hydraulic fracturing. Due to the critical role that casing connections play in well integrity, various industry stakeholders (operators and connection manufacturers) discussed the concept of creating an application-specific method to evaluate casing connection performance in hydraulically fractured wells.\n In 2016 the API established a committee of industry experts under Work Item (WI) 3081 to develop this new evaluation protocol for casing connections used in hydraulically fractured wells. This protocol will provide users with a means to evaluate casing connection performance under a consistent method of discrete test program elements developed to replicate the cyclic rotating-bending loads of well construction and the pressure cycling of multi-stage hydraulic fracturing. Unlike its predecessors, this protocol will not follow the traditional prescriptive approach but rather allow the end user to customize a test program made up of the various elements that are representative of their application. Once published, this protocol will be referred to as API Technical Report (TR) 5SF, Guidelines for Evaluation Casing Connection Performance in Multi-Fractured Horizontal Wells.\n This paper will summarize the development of API TR 5SF, the various test program elements that have been created to replicate the unique loads of hydraulically fractured wells, and provide examples of customized test programs that can be derived from the various test program elements.","PeriodicalId":10957,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, February 05, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing an Evaluation Method for Casing Connections used in Hydraulically Fractured Wells\",\"authors\":\"K. Hamilton, P. Pattillo\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/194369-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Hydraulic fracturing as a means to stimulate production has become an effective way to extract oil and gas from low-porosity, low-permeability, hydrocarbon-bearing formations. The technology used in support of hydraulic fracturing is evolving at a fast rate, which has enabled operators worldwide to achieve improved recovery in increasingly complex well environments.\\n The well designs and completion strategies associated with hydraulic fracturing come with a unique set of challenges. During well construction, the long lateral sections of extended-reach wells may require the production (or intermediate) casing to be rotated and pushed through build sections of relatively high curvature (greater than 10° per 100 feet or 30 meters); furthermore, some operators rotate the casing during cementing to improve cement quality. This rotation can subject the casing connections in the build section to a high number of rotating-bending load cycles. This cyclic loading can result in high stresses in the thread roots of the casing connections, which may lead to localized yielding of the material and potential structural failure. The hydraulic fracturing process itself subjects the production casing to rapid increases in internal pressure to high magnitudes, which will result in cyclic pressure loading for wells with multiple stages. Given these considerations, casing connections that are used in hydraulically fractured wells can be subjected to significant cyclic loading before the well is produced, and this loading may have an impact on the overall casing connection sealing and structural capacity in subsequent well operations.\\n In 2015 the American Petroleum Institute (API) published the first edition of Recommended Practice 100-1, Hydraulic Fracturing – Well Integrity and Fracture Containment, to provide the industry with guidelines and considerations for hydraulically fractured well designs, including recommendations on casing string design. This document does not include specific criteria for how to assess the performance of equipment. Since current connection evaluation protocols such as API RP 5C5 and ISO/PAS 12835 do not target the types of loading that are commonly observed in hydraulically fractured wells, connections that are evaluated under these protocols may not be suitable for hydraulic fracturing. Due to the critical role that casing connections play in well integrity, various industry stakeholders (operators and connection manufacturers) discussed the concept of creating an application-specific method to evaluate casing connection performance in hydraulically fractured wells.\\n In 2016 the API established a committee of industry experts under Work Item (WI) 3081 to develop this new evaluation protocol for casing connections used in hydraulically fractured wells. This protocol will provide users with a means to evaluate casing connection performance under a consistent method of discrete test program elements developed to replicate the cyclic rotating-bending loads of well construction and the pressure cycling of multi-stage hydraulic fracturing. Unlike its predecessors, this protocol will not follow the traditional prescriptive approach but rather allow the end user to customize a test program made up of the various elements that are representative of their application. Once published, this protocol will be referred to as API Technical Report (TR) 5SF, Guidelines for Evaluation Casing Connection Performance in Multi-Fractured Horizontal Wells.\\n This paper will summarize the development of API TR 5SF, the various test program elements that have been created to replicate the unique loads of hydraulically fractured wells, and provide examples of customized test programs that can be derived from the various test program elements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Tue, February 05, 2019\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Tue, February 05, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/194369-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, February 05, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194369-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

水力压裂作为一种增产手段,已成为从低孔低渗含油气地层中提取油气的有效途径。用于支持水力压裂的技术正在快速发展,这使得世界各地的运营商能够在日益复杂的井环境中实现更高的采收率。与水力压裂相关的井设计和完井策略面临着一系列独特的挑战。在造井过程中,大位移井的长水平段可能需要旋转生产(或中间)套管,并将其推入曲率相对较大的造井段(每100英尺或30米大于10°);此外,一些作业者在固井过程中旋转套管以提高固井质量。这种旋转可以使构建段的套管连接承受大量的旋转弯曲载荷循环。这种循环载荷会导致套管连接处的螺纹根部产生高应力,这可能导致材料的局部屈服和潜在的结构破坏。水力压裂过程本身会使生产套管内压力快速增加到很高的量级,这将导致多级井的循环压力加载。考虑到这些因素,在水力压裂井中使用的套管连接在生产之前可能会受到显著的循环载荷,这种载荷可能会影响后续井作业中套管连接的整体密封性和结构能力。2015年,美国石油协会(API)发布了第一版推荐实施细则100-1《水力压裂—井完整性和裂缝遏制》,为行业提供了水力压裂井设计的指南和考虑因素,包括套管柱设计的建议。本文件不包括如何评估设备性能的具体标准。由于目前的连接评估协议,如API RP 5C5和ISO/PAS 12835,并没有针对水力压裂井中常见的载荷类型,因此根据这些协议进行评估的连接可能不适合水力压裂。由于套管连接在井的完整性中起着至关重要的作用,各个行业的利益相关者(运营商和连接制造商)都在讨论创建一种特定于应用的方法来评估水力压裂井中套管连接性能的概念。2016年,美国石油协会在工作项目(WI) 3081下成立了一个行业专家委员会,为水力压裂井中使用的套管接头制定新的评估方案。该方案将为用户提供一种在离散测试程序元素的一致方法下评估套管连接性能的方法,该测试程序元素可以复制造井过程中的循环旋转弯曲载荷和多级水力压裂的压力循环。与之前的协议不同,该协议将不遵循传统的规定性方法,而是允许最终用户自定义由代表其应用程序的各种元素组成的测试程序。一旦发布,该协议将被称为API技术报告(TR) 5SF,《多裂缝水平井套管连接性能评价指南》。本文将总结API TR 5SF的开发,以及为复制水力压裂井的独特载荷而创建的各种测试程序元素,并提供可以从各种测试程序元素中衍生出的定制测试程序示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing an Evaluation Method for Casing Connections used in Hydraulically Fractured Wells
Hydraulic fracturing as a means to stimulate production has become an effective way to extract oil and gas from low-porosity, low-permeability, hydrocarbon-bearing formations. The technology used in support of hydraulic fracturing is evolving at a fast rate, which has enabled operators worldwide to achieve improved recovery in increasingly complex well environments. The well designs and completion strategies associated with hydraulic fracturing come with a unique set of challenges. During well construction, the long lateral sections of extended-reach wells may require the production (or intermediate) casing to be rotated and pushed through build sections of relatively high curvature (greater than 10° per 100 feet or 30 meters); furthermore, some operators rotate the casing during cementing to improve cement quality. This rotation can subject the casing connections in the build section to a high number of rotating-bending load cycles. This cyclic loading can result in high stresses in the thread roots of the casing connections, which may lead to localized yielding of the material and potential structural failure. The hydraulic fracturing process itself subjects the production casing to rapid increases in internal pressure to high magnitudes, which will result in cyclic pressure loading for wells with multiple stages. Given these considerations, casing connections that are used in hydraulically fractured wells can be subjected to significant cyclic loading before the well is produced, and this loading may have an impact on the overall casing connection sealing and structural capacity in subsequent well operations. In 2015 the American Petroleum Institute (API) published the first edition of Recommended Practice 100-1, Hydraulic Fracturing – Well Integrity and Fracture Containment, to provide the industry with guidelines and considerations for hydraulically fractured well designs, including recommendations on casing string design. This document does not include specific criteria for how to assess the performance of equipment. Since current connection evaluation protocols such as API RP 5C5 and ISO/PAS 12835 do not target the types of loading that are commonly observed in hydraulically fractured wells, connections that are evaluated under these protocols may not be suitable for hydraulic fracturing. Due to the critical role that casing connections play in well integrity, various industry stakeholders (operators and connection manufacturers) discussed the concept of creating an application-specific method to evaluate casing connection performance in hydraulically fractured wells. In 2016 the API established a committee of industry experts under Work Item (WI) 3081 to develop this new evaluation protocol for casing connections used in hydraulically fractured wells. This protocol will provide users with a means to evaluate casing connection performance under a consistent method of discrete test program elements developed to replicate the cyclic rotating-bending loads of well construction and the pressure cycling of multi-stage hydraulic fracturing. Unlike its predecessors, this protocol will not follow the traditional prescriptive approach but rather allow the end user to customize a test program made up of the various elements that are representative of their application. Once published, this protocol will be referred to as API Technical Report (TR) 5SF, Guidelines for Evaluation Casing Connection Performance in Multi-Fractured Horizontal Wells. This paper will summarize the development of API TR 5SF, the various test program elements that have been created to replicate the unique loads of hydraulically fractured wells, and provide examples of customized test programs that can be derived from the various test program elements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信