国内醛固酮检测与EQA结果分析

Q4 Health Professions
Weiyan Zhou, Wenbo Luo, Qingxiang Liu, Jiangtao Zhang, Rong Ma, Cui-hua Hu, Haijian Zhao, Chuanbao Zhang
{"title":"国内醛固酮检测与EQA结果分析","authors":"Weiyan Zhou, Wenbo Luo, Qingxiang Liu, Jiangtao Zhang, Rong Ma, Cui-hua Hu, Haijian Zhao, Chuanbao Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1009-9158.2020.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the performance of aldosterone testing in China through the External Quality Assessment (EQA) and improve the testing quality of aldosterone. \n \n \nMethods \nTwo kinds of EQA program for aldosterone were carried out in China, one of which is Routine EQA and the other is Trueness verification scheme. Lyophilized sera with 5 concentration levels were used as quality control of Routine EQA. The results were grouped according to the instrument. Target values and the coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated in each group. Trueness verification scheme was verified by using frozen human sera of 3 concentration levels determined by the reference method, and the bias of each instrument group from the target value was calculated. \n \n \nResults \n272 laboratories submitted the testing results, and 91.6% of laboratories used chemiluminescence method. The maximum CV was obtained by radioimmunoassay and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, and the robust CVs were 14.6%-33.4% and 43.5%-53.9%, respectively. For chemiluminescence methods, the robust group CV was less than 10%. The results of the Trueness verification scheme showed that liquid chromatography mass spectrometry method was the most accurate method, with biases of -7.9%, 8.9% and -0.7% for the three quality controls. Diasorin system had the more accurate results deviated from the target by 58.7%, 7.9% and -2.1%, respectively. The results of other chemiluminescence methods were negatively correlated with the sample concentration, and one of them with a bias of 479%. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe accuracy and comparability of aldosterone among laboratories in China are not satisfactory. Reagent manufacturers and laboratories should pay more attention to EQA, with the aldosterone results traceable to SI unit, and improve the test quality of aldosterone. \n \n \nKey words: \nAldosterone; Quality control; Reference standards","PeriodicalId":10096,"journal":{"name":"中华检验医学杂志","volume":"6 1","pages":"267-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis on the performance of aldosterone testing and the results of EQA in China\",\"authors\":\"Weiyan Zhou, Wenbo Luo, Qingxiang Liu, Jiangtao Zhang, Rong Ma, Cui-hua Hu, Haijian Zhao, Chuanbao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1009-9158.2020.03.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate the performance of aldosterone testing in China through the External Quality Assessment (EQA) and improve the testing quality of aldosterone. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nTwo kinds of EQA program for aldosterone were carried out in China, one of which is Routine EQA and the other is Trueness verification scheme. Lyophilized sera with 5 concentration levels were used as quality control of Routine EQA. The results were grouped according to the instrument. Target values and the coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated in each group. Trueness verification scheme was verified by using frozen human sera of 3 concentration levels determined by the reference method, and the bias of each instrument group from the target value was calculated. \\n \\n \\nResults \\n272 laboratories submitted the testing results, and 91.6% of laboratories used chemiluminescence method. The maximum CV was obtained by radioimmunoassay and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, and the robust CVs were 14.6%-33.4% and 43.5%-53.9%, respectively. For chemiluminescence methods, the robust group CV was less than 10%. The results of the Trueness verification scheme showed that liquid chromatography mass spectrometry method was the most accurate method, with biases of -7.9%, 8.9% and -0.7% for the three quality controls. Diasorin system had the more accurate results deviated from the target by 58.7%, 7.9% and -2.1%, respectively. The results of other chemiluminescence methods were negatively correlated with the sample concentration, and one of them with a bias of 479%. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe accuracy and comparability of aldosterone among laboratories in China are not satisfactory. Reagent manufacturers and laboratories should pay more attention to EQA, with the aldosterone results traceable to SI unit, and improve the test quality of aldosterone. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nAldosterone; Quality control; Reference standards\",\"PeriodicalId\":10096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华检验医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"267-273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华检验医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1009-9158.2020.03.014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华检验医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1009-9158.2020.03.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的通过外部质量评价(EQA)对国内醛固酮检测工作进行评价,提高醛固酮检测质量。方法采用常规EQA和真实性验证方案两种醛固酮EQA方法。5种浓度水平的冻干血清作为常规EQA的质量控制。结果根据仪器进行分组。计算各组的目标值和变异系数(CV)。采用参照法确定的3种浓度水平的冷冻人血清,对准确性验证方案进行验证,并计算各仪器组与目标值的偏差。结果272家实验室提交了检测结果,91.6%的实验室采用化学发光法。放射免疫法和液相色谱质谱法获得的最大CV值分别为14.6% ~ 33.4%和43.5% ~ 53.9%。对于化学发光方法,稳健组CV小于10%。验证方案结果表明,液相色谱质谱法准确度最高,3种质控偏差分别为-7.9%、8.9%和-0.7%。Diasorin系统与目标的偏差分别为58.7%、7.9%和-2.1%。其他化学发光方法的结果与样品浓度呈负相关,其中一种方法的偏差为479%。结论国内各实验室醛固酮检测结果的准确性和可比性不理想。试剂生产企业和实验室应更加重视EQA,使醛固酮检测结果可溯源至SI单位,提高醛固酮检测质量。关键词:醛固酮;质量控制;参考标准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis on the performance of aldosterone testing and the results of EQA in China
Objective To evaluate the performance of aldosterone testing in China through the External Quality Assessment (EQA) and improve the testing quality of aldosterone. Methods Two kinds of EQA program for aldosterone were carried out in China, one of which is Routine EQA and the other is Trueness verification scheme. Lyophilized sera with 5 concentration levels were used as quality control of Routine EQA. The results were grouped according to the instrument. Target values and the coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated in each group. Trueness verification scheme was verified by using frozen human sera of 3 concentration levels determined by the reference method, and the bias of each instrument group from the target value was calculated. Results 272 laboratories submitted the testing results, and 91.6% of laboratories used chemiluminescence method. The maximum CV was obtained by radioimmunoassay and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, and the robust CVs were 14.6%-33.4% and 43.5%-53.9%, respectively. For chemiluminescence methods, the robust group CV was less than 10%. The results of the Trueness verification scheme showed that liquid chromatography mass spectrometry method was the most accurate method, with biases of -7.9%, 8.9% and -0.7% for the three quality controls. Diasorin system had the more accurate results deviated from the target by 58.7%, 7.9% and -2.1%, respectively. The results of other chemiluminescence methods were negatively correlated with the sample concentration, and one of them with a bias of 479%. Conclusions The accuracy and comparability of aldosterone among laboratories in China are not satisfactory. Reagent manufacturers and laboratories should pay more attention to EQA, with the aldosterone results traceable to SI unit, and improve the test quality of aldosterone. Key words: Aldosterone; Quality control; Reference standards
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华检验医学杂志
中华检验医学杂志 Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8037
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信