{"title":"特刊导论:公共卫生、健康主义和肥胖","authors":"Nina Mackert, F. Schorb","doi":"10.1080/21604851.2021.1911486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most pervasive elements of fat phobia is the equation of body fat and poor health. Health effectively serves as the weapon of last resort when every other argument against fatness has failed to convince. Because of the “reductive collapse between weight and health” (LeBesco 2010, 154) and because health seems to be such an unequivocally positive and indisputable goal, this justifies the notion that fatness cannot in good conscience be embraced as part of human diversity. Public health, typically defined as “the science and art of preventing disease, prolonging life, and promoting physical and mental health” (Winslow 1920, 23), is shaped by an understanding of fatness as one of the main causes for chronic diseases and one of the major health problems the world is currently facing. The field defines itself in large part as prevention in contrast to medicine with its focus on intervention. This attitude is most eloquently expressed in the parable of the lethal river. In this tale, medicine is constantly rescuing drowning people out of the wild water without time to analyze the underlying causes. Public health on the other hand sees its role in preventing loss of lives by installing safety precautions upstream and, better yet, by teaching people how to swim (McKinlay 1979). This model worked well historically and had its most obvious success in the nineteenth century, when hygienic arrangements saved many people from infectious diseases well before the exact causes of these diseases were known, and long before a medical solution was readily available. The model became harder to repeat when, in the second half of the twentieth century, the prevention of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) became the central focus of health interventions in western societies. With the popularization of the “risk factor model” – that is, the identification of risks for illnesses such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases – it turned out to be increasingly difficult to pin down decisive risk factors with the required accuracy (Barnes and Parkhurst 2014). Since then, the solutions public health proposes against the risk factors of chronic diseases tend to address the","PeriodicalId":37967,"journal":{"name":"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society","volume":"10 1","pages":"1 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to the special issue: public health, healthism, and fatness\",\"authors\":\"Nina Mackert, F. Schorb\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21604851.2021.1911486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the most pervasive elements of fat phobia is the equation of body fat and poor health. Health effectively serves as the weapon of last resort when every other argument against fatness has failed to convince. Because of the “reductive collapse between weight and health” (LeBesco 2010, 154) and because health seems to be such an unequivocally positive and indisputable goal, this justifies the notion that fatness cannot in good conscience be embraced as part of human diversity. Public health, typically defined as “the science and art of preventing disease, prolonging life, and promoting physical and mental health” (Winslow 1920, 23), is shaped by an understanding of fatness as one of the main causes for chronic diseases and one of the major health problems the world is currently facing. The field defines itself in large part as prevention in contrast to medicine with its focus on intervention. This attitude is most eloquently expressed in the parable of the lethal river. In this tale, medicine is constantly rescuing drowning people out of the wild water without time to analyze the underlying causes. Public health on the other hand sees its role in preventing loss of lives by installing safety precautions upstream and, better yet, by teaching people how to swim (McKinlay 1979). This model worked well historically and had its most obvious success in the nineteenth century, when hygienic arrangements saved many people from infectious diseases well before the exact causes of these diseases were known, and long before a medical solution was readily available. The model became harder to repeat when, in the second half of the twentieth century, the prevention of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) became the central focus of health interventions in western societies. With the popularization of the “risk factor model” – that is, the identification of risks for illnesses such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases – it turned out to be increasingly difficult to pin down decisive risk factors with the required accuracy (Barnes and Parkhurst 2014). Since then, the solutions public health proposes against the risk factors of chronic diseases tend to address the\",\"PeriodicalId\":37967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2021.1911486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2021.1911486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
肥胖恐惧症最普遍的因素之一是身体脂肪和健康状况不佳的等式。当其他所有反对肥胖的论点都无法令人信服时,健康有效地充当了最后的武器。因为“体重和健康之间的减少崩溃”(LeBesco 2010, 154),因为健康似乎是这样一个明确的积极和无可争辩的目标,这证明了肥胖不能被良心地接受为人类多样性的一部分的概念是正当的。公共卫生通常被定义为“预防疾病、延长生命和促进身心健康的科学和艺术”(Winslow 1920, 23),它的形成是由于人们认识到肥胖是慢性疾病的主要原因之一,也是世界目前面临的主要健康问题之一。该领域在很大程度上将自己定义为预防,而不是专注于干预的医学。这种态度在致命河流的寓言中得到了最有力的表达。在这个故事中,医学不断地把落水者从汪洋大海中救出来,却没有时间去分析根本原因。另一方面,公共卫生认为它的作用是通过在上游安装安全预防措施,更好的是,通过教人们如何游泳来防止生命损失(McKinlay 1979)。这种模式在历史上运作良好,在19世纪取得了最明显的成功,当时卫生安排使许多人免于传染病,而这些疾病的确切原因远在人们知道之前,而且远在医疗解决方案现成之前。20世纪下半叶,当预防非传染性疾病(NCDs)成为西方社会卫生干预的中心焦点时,这种模式变得更加难以重复。随着“风险因素模型”(即识别糖尿病和心血管疾病等疾病的风险)的普及,事实证明,以所需的准确性确定决定性风险因素越来越困难(Barnes and Parkhurst 2014)。从那时起,公共卫生针对慢性病危险因素提出的解决办法往往涉及到
Introduction to the special issue: public health, healthism, and fatness
One of the most pervasive elements of fat phobia is the equation of body fat and poor health. Health effectively serves as the weapon of last resort when every other argument against fatness has failed to convince. Because of the “reductive collapse between weight and health” (LeBesco 2010, 154) and because health seems to be such an unequivocally positive and indisputable goal, this justifies the notion that fatness cannot in good conscience be embraced as part of human diversity. Public health, typically defined as “the science and art of preventing disease, prolonging life, and promoting physical and mental health” (Winslow 1920, 23), is shaped by an understanding of fatness as one of the main causes for chronic diseases and one of the major health problems the world is currently facing. The field defines itself in large part as prevention in contrast to medicine with its focus on intervention. This attitude is most eloquently expressed in the parable of the lethal river. In this tale, medicine is constantly rescuing drowning people out of the wild water without time to analyze the underlying causes. Public health on the other hand sees its role in preventing loss of lives by installing safety precautions upstream and, better yet, by teaching people how to swim (McKinlay 1979). This model worked well historically and had its most obvious success in the nineteenth century, when hygienic arrangements saved many people from infectious diseases well before the exact causes of these diseases were known, and long before a medical solution was readily available. The model became harder to repeat when, in the second half of the twentieth century, the prevention of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) became the central focus of health interventions in western societies. With the popularization of the “risk factor model” – that is, the identification of risks for illnesses such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases – it turned out to be increasingly difficult to pin down decisive risk factors with the required accuracy (Barnes and Parkhurst 2014). Since then, the solutions public health proposes against the risk factors of chronic diseases tend to address the