钝性创伤中外伤性内伤指标的评价

A. Hafez, Amira A. Wahdan
{"title":"钝性创伤中外伤性内伤指标的评价","authors":"A. Hafez, Amira A. Wahdan","doi":"10.21608/ejfsat.2021.91366.1214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Blunt trauma presents a challenge when external injuries are used to determine or predict the type and severity of internal injuries. Objective: to assess the relationship between internal injuries and external injuries in blunt trauma adult victims. Methodology: This retrospective study was conducted on adult victims of blunt trauma admitted to the Emergency hospital, Tanta University Hospitals from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2019. Collected variables included sociodemographic data, circumstances of trauma, and sustained injuries. The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) was calculated for external and internal injuries. Results: The study included 311 victims of blunt trauma. A significant association between external and internal injuries was detected in all body regions (p<0.05), but the positive predictive value (PPV) of external injury was low (below 60%) except for the neck and extremities (75% and 62.4%, respectively). The negative predictive value was ≥90% for all body regions except the head (80.6%). The correlations between AIS of external and internal injuries were positive, moderate, and significant in the neck (rs=0.668, p<0.001), extremities (rs=0.535, p<0.001), and head (rs=0.334, p<0.001), but weak in the chest (rs=0.147, p=0.009) and abdomen (rs=0.123, p=0.030). Conclusion: external injuries are considered as poor indicators of the presence of internal injuries in most body regions. Physicians should not be tempted to rule in or out the presence of internal injury based on external examination. Forensic experts should determine the extent of internal injuries based either on complete autopsy or implement the techniques of the virtual autopsy to avoid misdiagnosing significant internal injuries.","PeriodicalId":22435,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences and Applied Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATION OF EXTERNAL INJURIES AS INDICATORS OF INTERNAL INJURIES IN VICTIMS OF BLUNT TRAUMA\",\"authors\":\"A. Hafez, Amira A. Wahdan\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ejfsat.2021.91366.1214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Blunt trauma presents a challenge when external injuries are used to determine or predict the type and severity of internal injuries. Objective: to assess the relationship between internal injuries and external injuries in blunt trauma adult victims. Methodology: This retrospective study was conducted on adult victims of blunt trauma admitted to the Emergency hospital, Tanta University Hospitals from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2019. Collected variables included sociodemographic data, circumstances of trauma, and sustained injuries. The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) was calculated for external and internal injuries. Results: The study included 311 victims of blunt trauma. A significant association between external and internal injuries was detected in all body regions (p<0.05), but the positive predictive value (PPV) of external injury was low (below 60%) except for the neck and extremities (75% and 62.4%, respectively). The negative predictive value was ≥90% for all body regions except the head (80.6%). The correlations between AIS of external and internal injuries were positive, moderate, and significant in the neck (rs=0.668, p<0.001), extremities (rs=0.535, p<0.001), and head (rs=0.334, p<0.001), but weak in the chest (rs=0.147, p=0.009) and abdomen (rs=0.123, p=0.030). Conclusion: external injuries are considered as poor indicators of the presence of internal injuries in most body regions. Physicians should not be tempted to rule in or out the presence of internal injury based on external examination. Forensic experts should determine the extent of internal injuries based either on complete autopsy or implement the techniques of the virtual autopsy to avoid misdiagnosing significant internal injuries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences and Applied Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences and Applied Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejfsat.2021.91366.1214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences and Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejfsat.2021.91366.1214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当使用外伤来确定或预测内伤的类型和严重程度时,钝性创伤提出了一个挑战。目的:探讨成人钝性外伤中内伤与外伤的关系。方法:本回顾性研究对2019年1月1日至2019年12月31日在坦塔大学附属医院急诊医院收治的成年钝性创伤患者进行了研究。收集的变量包括社会人口统计数据、创伤情况和持续伤害。计算外伤和内伤简易损伤量表(AIS)。结果:该研究包括311名钝性创伤受害者。除颈部和四肢外伤阳性预测值(分别为75%和62.4%)外,其余部位外伤阳性预测值(PPV)均低于60% (p<0.05)。除头部(80.6%)外,所有身体部位的阴性预测值均≥90%。外、内伤AIS与颈部(rs=0.668, p<0.001)、四肢(rs=0.535, p<0.001)、头部(rs=0.334, p<0.001)呈中度正相关,而胸部(rs=0.147, p=0.009)、腹部(rs=0.123, p=0.030)相关性较弱。结论:在大多数身体区域,外部损伤被认为是内伤存在的较差指标。医生不应该根据外部检查来判断是否存在内伤。法医专家应根据完整的尸检或采用虚拟尸检技术来确定内伤的程度,以避免误诊严重的内伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUATION OF EXTERNAL INJURIES AS INDICATORS OF INTERNAL INJURIES IN VICTIMS OF BLUNT TRAUMA
Background: Blunt trauma presents a challenge when external injuries are used to determine or predict the type and severity of internal injuries. Objective: to assess the relationship between internal injuries and external injuries in blunt trauma adult victims. Methodology: This retrospective study was conducted on adult victims of blunt trauma admitted to the Emergency hospital, Tanta University Hospitals from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2019. Collected variables included sociodemographic data, circumstances of trauma, and sustained injuries. The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) was calculated for external and internal injuries. Results: The study included 311 victims of blunt trauma. A significant association between external and internal injuries was detected in all body regions (p<0.05), but the positive predictive value (PPV) of external injury was low (below 60%) except for the neck and extremities (75% and 62.4%, respectively). The negative predictive value was ≥90% for all body regions except the head (80.6%). The correlations between AIS of external and internal injuries were positive, moderate, and significant in the neck (rs=0.668, p<0.001), extremities (rs=0.535, p<0.001), and head (rs=0.334, p<0.001), but weak in the chest (rs=0.147, p=0.009) and abdomen (rs=0.123, p=0.030). Conclusion: external injuries are considered as poor indicators of the presence of internal injuries in most body regions. Physicians should not be tempted to rule in or out the presence of internal injury based on external examination. Forensic experts should determine the extent of internal injuries based either on complete autopsy or implement the techniques of the virtual autopsy to avoid misdiagnosing significant internal injuries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信