评价氟比洛芬对术后疼痛疗效的比较研究

Ibrahim Alreshidi, Yu Feng, Xie Han
{"title":"评价氟比洛芬对术后疼痛疗效的比较研究","authors":"Ibrahim Alreshidi, Yu Feng, Xie Han","doi":"10.3329/ICPJ.V4I3.21935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of flurbiprofen, which is a member of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug group (NSAIDs), on postoperative pain treatment. From September 2013 to May 2014, total of 250 patients were surveyed to perform a systematic evaluation of postoperative pain by comparing flurbiprofen with two other kinds of NSAIDs (diclofenac and ketorolac) and isotonic saline in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized for treatment: 65 cases received flurbiprofen, 60 cases received diclofenac sodium, 60 cases received ketorolac and 65 cases received the placebo (0.9% isotonic saline) (control group). After 24-hours of surgery patients treated with flurbiprofen, ketorolac, and diclofenac showed the lowermost PPI scores compared with those treated with 0.9% isotonic saline (P<0.05). Moreover, flurbiprofen-treated patients also had the lowest PRI(R)T scores (P<0.05). When the pain rating index was examined by subclass, a significantly lower PRI(R)S score was detected in the flurbiprofen group at 24 hours (P<0.05). However, at the 96-hour time point, no differences that were found in PPI and PRI[R] scores between the ketorolac, diclofenac, and flurbiprofen groups, whereas the control group was significantly less effective than the NSAID drugs. Flurbiprofen seemed to be the most effective NSAID for the treatment of pain after internal fixation of fracture, even though at 24 hours after surgery pain was at a maximum. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/icpj.v4i3.21935 International Current Pharmaceutical Journal, February 2015, 4(3): 367-369","PeriodicalId":13811,"journal":{"name":"International Current Pharmaceutical Journal","volume":"IA-23 1","pages":"367-369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study for evaluating flurbiprofen effectiveness in postoperative pain\",\"authors\":\"Ibrahim Alreshidi, Yu Feng, Xie Han\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/ICPJ.V4I3.21935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of flurbiprofen, which is a member of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug group (NSAIDs), on postoperative pain treatment. From September 2013 to May 2014, total of 250 patients were surveyed to perform a systematic evaluation of postoperative pain by comparing flurbiprofen with two other kinds of NSAIDs (diclofenac and ketorolac) and isotonic saline in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized for treatment: 65 cases received flurbiprofen, 60 cases received diclofenac sodium, 60 cases received ketorolac and 65 cases received the placebo (0.9% isotonic saline) (control group). After 24-hours of surgery patients treated with flurbiprofen, ketorolac, and diclofenac showed the lowermost PPI scores compared with those treated with 0.9% isotonic saline (P<0.05). Moreover, flurbiprofen-treated patients also had the lowest PRI(R)T scores (P<0.05). When the pain rating index was examined by subclass, a significantly lower PRI(R)S score was detected in the flurbiprofen group at 24 hours (P<0.05). However, at the 96-hour time point, no differences that were found in PPI and PRI[R] scores between the ketorolac, diclofenac, and flurbiprofen groups, whereas the control group was significantly less effective than the NSAID drugs. Flurbiprofen seemed to be the most effective NSAID for the treatment of pain after internal fixation of fracture, even though at 24 hours after surgery pain was at a maximum. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/icpj.v4i3.21935 International Current Pharmaceutical Journal, February 2015, 4(3): 367-369\",\"PeriodicalId\":13811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Current Pharmaceutical Journal\",\"volume\":\"IA-23 1\",\"pages\":\"367-369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Current Pharmaceutical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/ICPJ.V4I3.21935\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Current Pharmaceutical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/ICPJ.V4I3.21935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

氟比洛芬是非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)中的一员,本研究旨在评价氟比洛芬对术后疼痛的治疗效果。2013年9月至2014年5月,在一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究中,共调查250例患者,通过比较氟比洛芬与其他两种非甾体抗炎药(双氯芬酸和酮酸)及等渗生理盐水,对术后疼痛进行系统评价。随机分组治疗:氟比洛芬65例,双氯芬酸钠60例,酮乐酸60例,安慰剂(0.9%等渗盐水)65例(对照组)。术后24小时,氟比洛芬、酮洛酸、双氯芬酸组PPI评分较0.9%等渗盐水组最低(P<0.05)。氟比洛芬组PRI(R)T评分最低(P<0.05)。按亚分类检测疼痛评分指数时,氟比洛芬组24小时的PRI(R)S评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。然而,在96小时时间点,酮洛酸组、双氯芬酸组和氟比洛芬组之间PPI和PRI[R]评分无差异,而对照组的效果明显低于NSAID药物。氟比洛芬似乎是治疗骨折内固定后疼痛最有效的非甾体抗炎药,即使在术后24小时疼痛最大。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/icpj.v4i3.21935国际现代医药杂志,2015年2月,4(3):367-369
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study for evaluating flurbiprofen effectiveness in postoperative pain
Aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of flurbiprofen, which is a member of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug group (NSAIDs), on postoperative pain treatment. From September 2013 to May 2014, total of 250 patients were surveyed to perform a systematic evaluation of postoperative pain by comparing flurbiprofen with two other kinds of NSAIDs (diclofenac and ketorolac) and isotonic saline in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized for treatment: 65 cases received flurbiprofen, 60 cases received diclofenac sodium, 60 cases received ketorolac and 65 cases received the placebo (0.9% isotonic saline) (control group). After 24-hours of surgery patients treated with flurbiprofen, ketorolac, and diclofenac showed the lowermost PPI scores compared with those treated with 0.9% isotonic saline (P<0.05). Moreover, flurbiprofen-treated patients also had the lowest PRI(R)T scores (P<0.05). When the pain rating index was examined by subclass, a significantly lower PRI(R)S score was detected in the flurbiprofen group at 24 hours (P<0.05). However, at the 96-hour time point, no differences that were found in PPI and PRI[R] scores between the ketorolac, diclofenac, and flurbiprofen groups, whereas the control group was significantly less effective than the NSAID drugs. Flurbiprofen seemed to be the most effective NSAID for the treatment of pain after internal fixation of fracture, even though at 24 hours after surgery pain was at a maximum. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/icpj.v4i3.21935 International Current Pharmaceutical Journal, February 2015, 4(3): 367-369
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信