是否有可能评估急诊病人的满意度?

J Reboul-Marty , P Thoreux , M Debien , J.L Roynard , M Durand , G Languillat
{"title":"是否有可能评估急诊病人的满意度?","authors":"J Reboul-Marty ,&nbsp;P Thoreux ,&nbsp;M Debien ,&nbsp;J.L Roynard ,&nbsp;M Durand ,&nbsp;G Languillat","doi":"10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90072-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to assess patients' satisfaction in an emergency unit.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> French-speaking patients and volunteers that came to the emergency unit between 10:00 am and 12:00 pm were included in the study for a two-week period. In order to obtain reliable responses, the investigators interviewed the patients face to face with the assistance of a specific questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Fifty-two percent of the 514 interviewed patients agreed to answer the investigators' questions; the major reason for failure to reply was the lack of time. Using the Principal Components Analysis, the data were gathered into six dimensions: reception, waiting room 1, waiting room 2, staff appreciation, communication, and waiting time. Six scores of dissatisfaction were established, ranging from 0 (most satisfied) to 100 (most dissatisfied). The results showed that the most worrying point was the waiting (45 ± 22 min). The perception of the length of waiting time was statistically related (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) to the time spent in the emergency unit, contrary to its tolerance. The second point of dissatisfaction was the location (waiting room 1:30 ± 22; waiting room 2.31 ± 22). Finally, the most motivating point for the staff was the recognition of their work by the patients (28 ± 15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study found the reasons for the published dissatisfaction. Its intent was to quantify the degree of dissatisfaction and to treat the problems on a hierarchical basis, thus making it possible to better meet the patients' needs. The assessment of patients' satisfaction in an emergency unit is possible but implies a significant deployment of means to obtain a satisfying response rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101063,"journal":{"name":"Réanimation Urgences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90072-0","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L'évaluation de la satisfaction des patients des services d'urgences est-elle possible?\",\"authors\":\"J Reboul-Marty ,&nbsp;P Thoreux ,&nbsp;M Debien ,&nbsp;J.L Roynard ,&nbsp;M Durand ,&nbsp;G Languillat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90072-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this study was to assess patients' satisfaction in an emergency unit.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> French-speaking patients and volunteers that came to the emergency unit between 10:00 am and 12:00 pm were included in the study for a two-week period. In order to obtain reliable responses, the investigators interviewed the patients face to face with the assistance of a specific questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Fifty-two percent of the 514 interviewed patients agreed to answer the investigators' questions; the major reason for failure to reply was the lack of time. Using the Principal Components Analysis, the data were gathered into six dimensions: reception, waiting room 1, waiting room 2, staff appreciation, communication, and waiting time. Six scores of dissatisfaction were established, ranging from 0 (most satisfied) to 100 (most dissatisfied). The results showed that the most worrying point was the waiting (45 ± 22 min). The perception of the length of waiting time was statistically related (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) to the time spent in the emergency unit, contrary to its tolerance. The second point of dissatisfaction was the location (waiting room 1:30 ± 22; waiting room 2.31 ± 22). Finally, the most motivating point for the staff was the recognition of their work by the patients (28 ± 15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study found the reasons for the published dissatisfaction. Its intent was to quantify the degree of dissatisfaction and to treat the problems on a hierarchical basis, thus making it possible to better meet the patients' needs. The assessment of patients' satisfaction in an emergency unit is possible but implies a significant deployment of means to obtain a satisfying response rate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Réanimation Urgences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1164-6756(00)90072-0\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Réanimation Urgences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164675600900720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Réanimation Urgences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164675600900720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究的目的是评估急诊科病人的满意度。方法:在上午10点至下午12点之间来到急诊室的法语患者和志愿者被纳入为期两周的研究。为了获得可靠的回答,研究者通过特定的问卷对患者进行了面对面的访谈。结果:514名受访患者中有52%的人同意回答调查人员的问题;没有答复的主要原因是时间不够。使用主成分分析,将数据收集到六个维度:接待,候诊室1,候诊室2,员工赞赏,沟通和等待时间。建立了六个不满意的分数,从0(最满意)到100(最不满意)。结果显示,最令人担忧的是等待时间(45±22 min)。对等待时间长度的感知有统计学意义(P <0.0001)到在应急单元花费的时间,违背了它的容忍度。第二个不满意点是位置(候诊室1:30±22;候诊室(2.31±22)。最后,对工作人员最具激励作用的是患者对其工作的认可(28±15)。结论:本研究找到了出版不满的原因。其目的是量化不满意的程度,并在分层的基础上处理问题,从而有可能更好地满足病人的需要。对急诊科病人的满意度进行评估是可能的,但这意味着需要大量的手段来获得令人满意的反应率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
L'évaluation de la satisfaction des patients des services d'urgences est-elle possible?

The aim of this study was to assess patients' satisfaction in an emergency unit.

Methods: French-speaking patients and volunteers that came to the emergency unit between 10:00 am and 12:00 pm were included in the study for a two-week period. In order to obtain reliable responses, the investigators interviewed the patients face to face with the assistance of a specific questionnaire.

Results: Fifty-two percent of the 514 interviewed patients agreed to answer the investigators' questions; the major reason for failure to reply was the lack of time. Using the Principal Components Analysis, the data were gathered into six dimensions: reception, waiting room 1, waiting room 2, staff appreciation, communication, and waiting time. Six scores of dissatisfaction were established, ranging from 0 (most satisfied) to 100 (most dissatisfied). The results showed that the most worrying point was the waiting (45 ± 22 min). The perception of the length of waiting time was statistically related (P < 0.0001) to the time spent in the emergency unit, contrary to its tolerance. The second point of dissatisfaction was the location (waiting room 1:30 ± 22; waiting room 2.31 ± 22). Finally, the most motivating point for the staff was the recognition of their work by the patients (28 ± 15).

Conclusion: This study found the reasons for the published dissatisfaction. Its intent was to quantify the degree of dissatisfaction and to treat the problems on a hierarchical basis, thus making it possible to better meet the patients' needs. The assessment of patients' satisfaction in an emergency unit is possible but implies a significant deployment of means to obtain a satisfying response rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信