B. Hansen, K. Larsen, H. Hátún, S. Olsen, A. Gierisch, S. Østerhus, S. Ólafsdóttir
{"title":"根据卫星测高和实地观测估计,冰岛-法罗暖流流向北极","authors":"B. Hansen, K. Larsen, H. Hátún, S. Olsen, A. Gierisch, S. Østerhus, S. Ólafsdóttir","doi":"10.5194/os-19-1225-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The inflow of warm and saline Atlantic water to the\nArctic Mediterranean (Nordic Seas and Arctic Ocean) between Iceland and the\nFaroes (IF inflow) is the strongest Atlantic inflow branch in terms of\nvolume transport and is associated with a large transport of heat towards the\nArctic. The IF inflow is monitored in a section east of the Iceland–Faroe\nRidge (IFR) by use of sea level anomaly (SLA) data from satellite altimetry,\na method that has been calibrated by in situ observations gathered over 2\ndecades. Monthly averaged surface velocity anomalies calculated from SLA\ndata were strongly correlated with anomalies measured by moored acoustic\nDoppler current profilers (ADCPs) with consistently higher correlations when\nusing the reprocessed SLA data released in December 2021 rather than the\nearlier version. In contrast to the earlier version, the reprocessed data\nalso had the correct conversion factor between sea level slope and surface\nvelocity required by geostrophy. Our results show that the IF inflow crosses\nthe IFR in two separate branches. The Icelandic branch is a jet over the\nIcelandic slope with average surface speed exceeding 20 cm s−1, but it\nis narrow and shallow with an average volume transport of less than 1 Sv\n(106 m3 s−1). Most of the Atlantic water crosses the IFR\nclose to its southernmost end in the Faroese branch. Between these two\nbranches, water from the Icelandic branch turns back onto the ridge in a\nretroflection with a recirculation over the northernmost bank on the IFR.\nCombining multi-sensor in situ observations with satellite SLA data, monthly\nmean volume transport of the IF inflow has been determined from January 1993\nto December 2021. The IF inflow is part of the Atlantic Meridional\nOverturning Circulation (AMOC), which is expected to weaken under continued\nglobal warming. Our results show no weakening of the IF inflow. Annually\naveraged volume transport of Atlantic water through the monitoring section\nhad a statistically significant (95 % confidence level) increasing trend\nof (0.12±0.10) Sv per decade. Combined with increasing temperature,\nthis caused an increase of 13 % in the heat transport, relative to 0 ∘C, towards the Arctic of the IF inflow over the 29 years of\nmonitoring. The near-bottom layer over most of the IFR is dominated by cold\nwater of Arctic origin that may contribute to the overflow across the ridge.\nOur observations confirm a dynamic link between the overflow and the\nAtlantic water flow above. The results also provide support for a previously\nposed hypothesis that this link may explain the difficulties in reproducing\nobserved transport variations in the IF inflow in numerical ocean models,\nwith consequences for its predictability under climate change.\n","PeriodicalId":19535,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Science","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Iceland–Faroe warm-water flow towards the Arctic estimated from satellite altimetry and in situ observations\",\"authors\":\"B. Hansen, K. Larsen, H. Hátún, S. Olsen, A. Gierisch, S. Østerhus, S. Ólafsdóttir\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/os-19-1225-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The inflow of warm and saline Atlantic water to the\\nArctic Mediterranean (Nordic Seas and Arctic Ocean) between Iceland and the\\nFaroes (IF inflow) is the strongest Atlantic inflow branch in terms of\\nvolume transport and is associated with a large transport of heat towards the\\nArctic. The IF inflow is monitored in a section east of the Iceland–Faroe\\nRidge (IFR) by use of sea level anomaly (SLA) data from satellite altimetry,\\na method that has been calibrated by in situ observations gathered over 2\\ndecades. Monthly averaged surface velocity anomalies calculated from SLA\\ndata were strongly correlated with anomalies measured by moored acoustic\\nDoppler current profilers (ADCPs) with consistently higher correlations when\\nusing the reprocessed SLA data released in December 2021 rather than the\\nearlier version. In contrast to the earlier version, the reprocessed data\\nalso had the correct conversion factor between sea level slope and surface\\nvelocity required by geostrophy. Our results show that the IF inflow crosses\\nthe IFR in two separate branches. The Icelandic branch is a jet over the\\nIcelandic slope with average surface speed exceeding 20 cm s−1, but it\\nis narrow and shallow with an average volume transport of less than 1 Sv\\n(106 m3 s−1). Most of the Atlantic water crosses the IFR\\nclose to its southernmost end in the Faroese branch. Between these two\\nbranches, water from the Icelandic branch turns back onto the ridge in a\\nretroflection with a recirculation over the northernmost bank on the IFR.\\nCombining multi-sensor in situ observations with satellite SLA data, monthly\\nmean volume transport of the IF inflow has been determined from January 1993\\nto December 2021. The IF inflow is part of the Atlantic Meridional\\nOverturning Circulation (AMOC), which is expected to weaken under continued\\nglobal warming. Our results show no weakening of the IF inflow. Annually\\naveraged volume transport of Atlantic water through the monitoring section\\nhad a statistically significant (95 % confidence level) increasing trend\\nof (0.12±0.10) Sv per decade. Combined with increasing temperature,\\nthis caused an increase of 13 % in the heat transport, relative to 0 ∘C, towards the Arctic of the IF inflow over the 29 years of\\nmonitoring. The near-bottom layer over most of the IFR is dominated by cold\\nwater of Arctic origin that may contribute to the overflow across the ridge.\\nOur observations confirm a dynamic link between the overflow and the\\nAtlantic water flow above. The results also provide support for a previously\\nposed hypothesis that this link may explain the difficulties in reproducing\\nobserved transport variations in the IF inflow in numerical ocean models,\\nwith consequences for its predictability under climate change.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":19535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean Science\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1225-2023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1225-2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
摘要在冰岛和法罗群岛之间,大西洋暖流和咸水流入北极地中海(北欧海和北冰洋)(IF流入)是大西洋流入的最强分支,就体积输送而言,它与向北极输送大量热量有关。利用来自卫星测高的海平面异常(SLA)数据监测冰岛-法罗基(IFR)以东一段的中频流入,该方法已通过20多年来收集的现场观测进行校准。SLAdata计算的月平均地表速度异常与系泊声学多普勒电流剖面仪(ADCPs)测量的异常密切相关,当使用2021年12月发布的重新处理的SLA数据时,相关性始终较高。与早期版本相比,重新处理的数据也具有正确的海平面坡度和地表速度之间的转换因子。我们的结果表明,中频流入在两个独立的分支中穿过IFR。冰岛分支是冰岛斜坡上的射流,平均表面速度超过20 cm s - 1,但它又窄又浅,平均体积输送小于1 Sv(106 m3 s - 1)。大部分的大西洋水穿过ifr靠近其最南端的法罗分支。在这两个分支之间,来自冰岛分支的水在IFR最北岸的再循环中以反射的方式回流到山脊上。结合多传感器现场观测和卫星SLA数据,确定了1993年1月至2021年12月中频入流的月平均体积输送。中频流入是大西洋经向翻转环流(AMOC)的一部分,预计在全球持续变暖的情况下,该环流将减弱。我们的研究结果表明,中频流入没有减弱。通过监测断面的大西洋年平均输水量有统计学上显著的(95%置信水平)增长趋势(0.12±0.10)Sv / 10年。再加上气温升高,在29年的监测中,相对于0°C,中暑流入向北极的热输送增加了13%。IFR大部分上空的近底层主要是来自北极的冷水,这可能会导致横越高压脊的溢流。我们的观测证实了溢流和上面大西洋水流之间的动态联系。这些结果还支持了先前提出的一个假设,即这种联系可以解释在数值海洋模式中重现观测到的中频流入的输送变化的困难,并影响其在气候变化下的可预测性。
The Iceland–Faroe warm-water flow towards the Arctic estimated from satellite altimetry and in situ observations
Abstract. The inflow of warm and saline Atlantic water to the
Arctic Mediterranean (Nordic Seas and Arctic Ocean) between Iceland and the
Faroes (IF inflow) is the strongest Atlantic inflow branch in terms of
volume transport and is associated with a large transport of heat towards the
Arctic. The IF inflow is monitored in a section east of the Iceland–Faroe
Ridge (IFR) by use of sea level anomaly (SLA) data from satellite altimetry,
a method that has been calibrated by in situ observations gathered over 2
decades. Monthly averaged surface velocity anomalies calculated from SLA
data were strongly correlated with anomalies measured by moored acoustic
Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) with consistently higher correlations when
using the reprocessed SLA data released in December 2021 rather than the
earlier version. In contrast to the earlier version, the reprocessed data
also had the correct conversion factor between sea level slope and surface
velocity required by geostrophy. Our results show that the IF inflow crosses
the IFR in two separate branches. The Icelandic branch is a jet over the
Icelandic slope with average surface speed exceeding 20 cm s−1, but it
is narrow and shallow with an average volume transport of less than 1 Sv
(106 m3 s−1). Most of the Atlantic water crosses the IFR
close to its southernmost end in the Faroese branch. Between these two
branches, water from the Icelandic branch turns back onto the ridge in a
retroflection with a recirculation over the northernmost bank on the IFR.
Combining multi-sensor in situ observations with satellite SLA data, monthly
mean volume transport of the IF inflow has been determined from January 1993
to December 2021. The IF inflow is part of the Atlantic Meridional
Overturning Circulation (AMOC), which is expected to weaken under continued
global warming. Our results show no weakening of the IF inflow. Annually
averaged volume transport of Atlantic water through the monitoring section
had a statistically significant (95 % confidence level) increasing trend
of (0.12±0.10) Sv per decade. Combined with increasing temperature,
this caused an increase of 13 % in the heat transport, relative to 0 ∘C, towards the Arctic of the IF inflow over the 29 years of
monitoring. The near-bottom layer over most of the IFR is dominated by cold
water of Arctic origin that may contribute to the overflow across the ridge.
Our observations confirm a dynamic link between the overflow and the
Atlantic water flow above. The results also provide support for a previously
posed hypothesis that this link may explain the difficulties in reproducing
observed transport variations in the IF inflow in numerical ocean models,
with consequences for its predictability under climate change.
期刊介绍:
Ocean Science (OS) is a not-for-profit international open-access scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of research articles, short communications, and review papers on all aspects of ocean science: experimental, theoretical, and laboratory. The primary objective is to publish a very high-quality scientific journal with free Internet-based access for researchers and other interested people throughout the world.
Electronic submission of articles is used to keep publication costs to a minimum. The costs will be covered by a moderate per-page charge paid by the authors. The peer-review process also makes use of the Internet. It includes an 8-week online discussion period with the original submitted manuscript and all comments. If accepted, the final revised paper will be published online.
Ocean Science covers the following fields: ocean physics (i.e. ocean structure, circulation, tides, and internal waves); ocean chemistry; biological oceanography; air–sea interactions; ocean models – physical, chemical, biological, and biochemical; coastal and shelf edge processes; paleooceanography.