一个专门的多学科研究和治疗网络对肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者预后的影响

Robbrecht Debbie G, Verhoeven Rob HA, Vries Peter de, Heijden Michiel S van der, Boormans Joost L, Wit Ronald de
{"title":"一个专门的多学科研究和治疗网络对肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者预后的影响","authors":"Robbrecht Debbie G, Verhoeven Rob HA, Vries Peter de, Heijden Michiel S van der, Boormans Joost L, Wit Ronald de","doi":"10.23937/2378-3419/1410105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group (DUOS) is a multidisciplinary network of ~30 hospitals involved in research and treatment of urological cancers. We analyzed the influence of treatment at DUOS versus non-DUOS on survival of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients and explored correlating parameters. Patients and methods: Characteristics of 3472 cT24aN0/XM0 MIBC patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC), with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), were collected by the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). 5-year overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analyses were performed to determine hazard ratios for pre-defined variables. Results: 5-year OS differed 3.2% in favor of DUOS centers (49.3% vs. 46.1%, p = 0.09). Best survival was observed in patients treated with NAC and RC at DUOS centers (5year OS 57%). This was 61.1% in cT3-4 patients treated at DUOS centers. NAC was only significantly associated with improved survival in cT3-4a patients treated at DUOS centers (p = 0.0002). Positive surgical margins were less frequent (p = 0.02) and more pelvic lymph nodes (LNs) were collected and identified (p = 0.001) at DUOS centers. Surgical margins, number of identified LNs, and number of positive LNs significantly correlated with OS. Conclusions: We identified a greater survival benefit by the use of NAC, a higher number of LNs identified, a lower rate of positive surgical margins and a trend towards survival benefit in patients treated at centers that collaborate in the multidisciplinary DUOS national network. Implications for practice: Our retrospective analysis based on 3472 muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, showed a non-significant trend towards survival benefit when treated in hospitals involved in a national study-group network (DUOS), with significantly superior outcomes concerning neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, surgical margins and lymph node dissection. These factors significantly correlated with an improved survival, favoring treatment at centers that are involved in a multidisciplinary national network with dedicated care for bladder cancer.","PeriodicalId":13873,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cancer and clinical research","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a Dedicated Multidisciplinary Research and Treatment Network on Outcomes of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients\",\"authors\":\"Robbrecht Debbie G, Verhoeven Rob HA, Vries Peter de, Heijden Michiel S van der, Boormans Joost L, Wit Ronald de\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2378-3419/1410105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group (DUOS) is a multidisciplinary network of ~30 hospitals involved in research and treatment of urological cancers. We analyzed the influence of treatment at DUOS versus non-DUOS on survival of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients and explored correlating parameters. Patients and methods: Characteristics of 3472 cT24aN0/XM0 MIBC patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC), with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), were collected by the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). 5-year overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analyses were performed to determine hazard ratios for pre-defined variables. Results: 5-year OS differed 3.2% in favor of DUOS centers (49.3% vs. 46.1%, p = 0.09). Best survival was observed in patients treated with NAC and RC at DUOS centers (5year OS 57%). This was 61.1% in cT3-4 patients treated at DUOS centers. NAC was only significantly associated with improved survival in cT3-4a patients treated at DUOS centers (p = 0.0002). Positive surgical margins were less frequent (p = 0.02) and more pelvic lymph nodes (LNs) were collected and identified (p = 0.001) at DUOS centers. Surgical margins, number of identified LNs, and number of positive LNs significantly correlated with OS. Conclusions: We identified a greater survival benefit by the use of NAC, a higher number of LNs identified, a lower rate of positive surgical margins and a trend towards survival benefit in patients treated at centers that collaborate in the multidisciplinary DUOS national network. Implications for practice: Our retrospective analysis based on 3472 muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, showed a non-significant trend towards survival benefit when treated in hospitals involved in a national study-group network (DUOS), with significantly superior outcomes concerning neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, surgical margins and lymph node dissection. These factors significantly correlated with an improved survival, favoring treatment at centers that are involved in a multidisciplinary national network with dedicated care for bladder cancer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of cancer and clinical research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of cancer and clinical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3419/1410105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cancer and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3419/1410105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:荷兰泌尿肿瘤研究组(DUOS)是一个由30多家医院组成的多学科网络,涉及泌尿肿瘤的研究和治疗。我们分析了DUOS治疗与非DUOS治疗对肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者生存的影响,并探讨了相关参数。患者和方法:荷兰癌症登记处(NCR)收集了3472例接受根治性膀胱切除术(RC),伴或不伴新辅助化疗(NAC)的cT24aN0/XM0 MIBC患者的特征。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计5年总生存期(OS)。采用Cox回归分析确定预定义变量的风险比。结果:DUOS中心的5年OS差异为3.2% (49.3% vs 46.1%, p = 0.09)。在DUOS中心接受NAC和RC治疗的患者观察到最佳生存率(5年生存率57%)。在DUOS中心治疗的cT3-4患者中,这一比例为61.1%。在DUOS中心接受治疗的cT3-4a患者中,NAC仅与生存率的提高显著相关(p = 0.0002)。阳性手术切缘较少(p = 0.02),在DUOS中心收集和鉴定的盆腔淋巴结(LNs)较多(p = 0.001)。手术切缘、确定的LNs数量和阳性LNs数量与OS显著相关。结论:我们发现,在多学科DUOS国家网络合作的中心治疗的患者中,使用NAC有更大的生存获益,发现的ln数量更多,手术切缘阳性率更低,生存获益趋势更大。实践意义:我们基于3472例肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者的回顾性分析显示,在国家研究小组网络(DUOS)参与的医院接受治疗时,生存获益的趋势不显著,在新辅助化疗、手术边缘和淋巴结清扫方面的结果明显优于其他患者。这些因素与生存率的提高显著相关,有利于在涉及多学科国家网络的中心进行治疗,并专门治疗膀胱癌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of a Dedicated Multidisciplinary Research and Treatment Network on Outcomes of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients
Background: The Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group (DUOS) is a multidisciplinary network of ~30 hospitals involved in research and treatment of urological cancers. We analyzed the influence of treatment at DUOS versus non-DUOS on survival of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients and explored correlating parameters. Patients and methods: Characteristics of 3472 cT24aN0/XM0 MIBC patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC), with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), were collected by the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). 5-year overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analyses were performed to determine hazard ratios for pre-defined variables. Results: 5-year OS differed 3.2% in favor of DUOS centers (49.3% vs. 46.1%, p = 0.09). Best survival was observed in patients treated with NAC and RC at DUOS centers (5year OS 57%). This was 61.1% in cT3-4 patients treated at DUOS centers. NAC was only significantly associated with improved survival in cT3-4a patients treated at DUOS centers (p = 0.0002). Positive surgical margins were less frequent (p = 0.02) and more pelvic lymph nodes (LNs) were collected and identified (p = 0.001) at DUOS centers. Surgical margins, number of identified LNs, and number of positive LNs significantly correlated with OS. Conclusions: We identified a greater survival benefit by the use of NAC, a higher number of LNs identified, a lower rate of positive surgical margins and a trend towards survival benefit in patients treated at centers that collaborate in the multidisciplinary DUOS national network. Implications for practice: Our retrospective analysis based on 3472 muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, showed a non-significant trend towards survival benefit when treated in hospitals involved in a national study-group network (DUOS), with significantly superior outcomes concerning neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, surgical margins and lymph node dissection. These factors significantly correlated with an improved survival, favoring treatment at centers that are involved in a multidisciplinary national network with dedicated care for bladder cancer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信