言论与诽谤自由:普通法世界的发展

A. Stone
{"title":"言论与诽谤自由:普通法世界的发展","authors":"A. Stone","doi":"10.4324/9781315254999-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This comment traces the relationship between freedom of speech and the common law of defamation in India, Australia, South Africa, Canada, the United Kingdom and New Zealand. A central theme is the treatment of the iconic decision of the United States Supreme Court in New York Times v Sullivan. This comment shows that while the use of foreign precedent by judges in common law countries is widespread, the use of such precedent is, in the main, not uncritical. The reaction of common law courts to New York Times signals that these courts will usually reassess and exercise their own judgment in relation to even the most revered aspects of the American constitutional tradition.","PeriodicalId":44672,"journal":{"name":"Monash University Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Freedom of Speech and Defamation: Developments in the Common Law World\",\"authors\":\"A. Stone\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315254999-19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This comment traces the relationship between freedom of speech and the common law of defamation in India, Australia, South Africa, Canada, the United Kingdom and New Zealand. A central theme is the treatment of the iconic decision of the United States Supreme Court in New York Times v Sullivan. This comment shows that while the use of foreign precedent by judges in common law countries is widespread, the use of such precedent is, in the main, not uncritical. The reaction of common law courts to New York Times signals that these courts will usually reassess and exercise their own judgment in relation to even the most revered aspects of the American constitutional tradition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monash University Law Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monash University Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315254999-19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315254999-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这篇评论追溯了印度、澳大利亚、南非、加拿大、英国和新西兰的言论自由与诽谤普通法之间的关系。一个中心主题是如何处理美国最高法院在《纽约时报》诉沙利文案中的标志性判决。这一评论表明,虽然英美法系国家的法官普遍使用外国先例,但这种先例的使用基本上不是不加批判的。普通法法院对《纽约时报》的反应表明,这些法院通常会重新评估并行使自己的判断,即使是与美国宪法传统中最受尊敬的方面有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Freedom of Speech and Defamation: Developments in the Common Law World
This comment traces the relationship between freedom of speech and the common law of defamation in India, Australia, South Africa, Canada, the United Kingdom and New Zealand. A central theme is the treatment of the iconic decision of the United States Supreme Court in New York Times v Sullivan. This comment shows that while the use of foreign precedent by judges in common law countries is widespread, the use of such precedent is, in the main, not uncritical. The reaction of common law courts to New York Times signals that these courts will usually reassess and exercise their own judgment in relation to even the most revered aspects of the American constitutional tradition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信