A. C. Oliveira, S. Griza, R. R. de Moraes, A. Faria-E-Silva
{"title":"填料掺量及光固化等待时间对双固化水泥力学性能的影响","authors":"A. C. Oliveira, S. Griza, R. R. de Moraes, A. Faria-E-Silva","doi":"10.2174/2542579x01666190924180448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nTo investigate the effect of filler content and the time spent before light-curing\non mechanical properties of dual-cured cement.\n\n\n\nExperimental dual-cured resin cements were formulated with 60, 65 or 68wt% of filler.\nThe viscosity of experimental cement was measured using a digital viscometer. Bar-shaped specimens\n(25 x 2 x 2 mm) were fabricated, while the light-curing was started immediately or 5 minutes\nafter the insertion of cement into the mold (n = 7). A three-point bending test was performed and the\nvalues of flexural strength and elastic modulus were measured. The Vickers hardness of fractured\nspecimens was measured on the surface of the cement. Data from viscosity were submitted to oneway\nANOVA, while the data from mechanical properties were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. All\npair-wise comparisons were performed using Tukey’s test (α = 0.05).\n\n\n\nThe experimental cement with 68wt% of filler showed the highest viscosity and those with\n60wt% showed the the lowest viscosity. Irrespective of the time spent before light-curing, the cement\nwith 65wt% of filler presented the highest values of flexural strength and elastic modulus. The\naddition of 60wt% of filler resulted in the lowest elastic modulus, while 68wt% of filler resulted in\nlowest flexural strength. Regarding the hardness, the cement with 68wt% of filler showed the highest\nvalues, while there was no difference between 60 and 65wt% of filler.\n\n\n\n Filler content affected the mechanical properties of the experimental cement and this\neffect did not depend on the waiting time before the light-curing procedure.\n","PeriodicalId":10853,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in dentistry","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Filler Content and Waiting time Before Light-Curing on Mechanical Properties of Dual-Cured Cement\",\"authors\":\"A. C. Oliveira, S. Griza, R. R. de Moraes, A. Faria-E-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2542579x01666190924180448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nTo investigate the effect of filler content and the time spent before light-curing\\non mechanical properties of dual-cured cement.\\n\\n\\n\\nExperimental dual-cured resin cements were formulated with 60, 65 or 68wt% of filler.\\nThe viscosity of experimental cement was measured using a digital viscometer. Bar-shaped specimens\\n(25 x 2 x 2 mm) were fabricated, while the light-curing was started immediately or 5 minutes\\nafter the insertion of cement into the mold (n = 7). A three-point bending test was performed and the\\nvalues of flexural strength and elastic modulus were measured. The Vickers hardness of fractured\\nspecimens was measured on the surface of the cement. Data from viscosity were submitted to oneway\\nANOVA, while the data from mechanical properties were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. All\\npair-wise comparisons were performed using Tukey’s test (α = 0.05).\\n\\n\\n\\nThe experimental cement with 68wt% of filler showed the highest viscosity and those with\\n60wt% showed the the lowest viscosity. Irrespective of the time spent before light-curing, the cement\\nwith 65wt% of filler presented the highest values of flexural strength and elastic modulus. The\\naddition of 60wt% of filler resulted in the lowest elastic modulus, while 68wt% of filler resulted in\\nlowest flexural strength. Regarding the hardness, the cement with 68wt% of filler showed the highest\\nvalues, while there was no difference between 60 and 65wt% of filler.\\n\\n\\n\\n Filler content affected the mechanical properties of the experimental cement and this\\neffect did not depend on the waiting time before the light-curing procedure.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":10853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in dentistry\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579x01666190924180448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579x01666190924180448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
探讨填料含量和光固化前时间对双固化水泥力学性能的影响。实验双固化树脂水泥分别以60%、65%或68%的填料配制。用数字式粘度计测量了实验水泥的粘度。制作棒状试样(25 x 2 x 2 mm),同时在将水泥插入模具后立即或5分钟开始光固化(n = 7)。进行三点弯曲试验,并测量弯曲强度和弹性模量值。在水泥表面测量了断裂试样的维氏硬度。粘度数据采用单因素方差分析,力学性能数据采用双因素方差分析。采用Tukey检验进行全对比较(α = 0.05)。掺量为68wt%的试验水泥粘度最高,掺量为60wt%的试验水泥粘度最低。与光固化前的时间无关,掺量为65%的水泥具有最高的抗弯强度和弹性模量。掺量为60wt%的填料导致弹性模量最低,而掺量为68wt%的填料导致抗弯强度最低。在硬度方面,掺量为68wt%的水泥硬度最高,掺量为60 wt%和65wt%的水泥硬度无显著差异。填料含量对试验水泥的力学性能有影响,且这种影响与光固化前的等待时间无关。
Effect of Filler Content and Waiting time Before Light-Curing on Mechanical Properties of Dual-Cured Cement
To investigate the effect of filler content and the time spent before light-curing
on mechanical properties of dual-cured cement.
Experimental dual-cured resin cements were formulated with 60, 65 or 68wt% of filler.
The viscosity of experimental cement was measured using a digital viscometer. Bar-shaped specimens
(25 x 2 x 2 mm) were fabricated, while the light-curing was started immediately or 5 minutes
after the insertion of cement into the mold (n = 7). A three-point bending test was performed and the
values of flexural strength and elastic modulus were measured. The Vickers hardness of fractured
specimens was measured on the surface of the cement. Data from viscosity were submitted to oneway
ANOVA, while the data from mechanical properties were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. All
pair-wise comparisons were performed using Tukey’s test (α = 0.05).
The experimental cement with 68wt% of filler showed the highest viscosity and those with
60wt% showed the the lowest viscosity. Irrespective of the time spent before light-curing, the cement
with 65wt% of filler presented the highest values of flexural strength and elastic modulus. The
addition of 60wt% of filler resulted in the lowest elastic modulus, while 68wt% of filler resulted in
lowest flexural strength. Regarding the hardness, the cement with 68wt% of filler showed the highest
values, while there was no difference between 60 and 65wt% of filler.
Filler content affected the mechanical properties of the experimental cement and this
effect did not depend on the waiting time before the light-curing procedure.