{"title":"厄瓜多尔清洁烹饪计划的家庭社会经济决定因素","authors":"Daniel Davi-Arderius, Moisés Obaco, R. Alvarado","doi":"10.1080/15567249.2022.2160525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ecuador is a developing South American country that has highly subsidized liquid petroleum gas (LPG) since 1974. Between 2015 and 2020, LPG subsidies amounted to 260 M USD annually. In 2014, the Ecuadorean government implemented a clean cooking program, to encourage the replacement of LPG with electricity, mainly through induction stoves. However, the engagement rate in this program was lower than initially expected. This work investigates the socioeconomic and sociodemographic determinants of using various cooking technologies in Ecuador, including induction stoves. We use official Ecuadorian household surveys from 2015 to 2017 to gather information on gender, age, marital status, educational level, ethnicity, income family, family size, urban area, and province of residence. We then perform two econometric analyses, one using a probit model to study the determinants of having an induction stove, and the other employing a multilogit model to investigate the sociodemographic characteristics associated with the use of different cooking technologies, namely LPG, firewood, and electricity. Our results indicate that non-married individuals, Indigenous people, the poor, and those living in rooms or apartments with poor housing conditions show the lowest likelihood of having an induction stove. Moreover, the most disadvantaged groups still prefer firewood instead of the highly subsidized LPG barrels. We also find important differences across provinces. Our results give rise to several policy recommendations. Clean cooking programs should have a more regional approach and consider specific subsidies for the most disadvantaged groups. Moreover, the successful implementation of clean cooking programs may require the implementation of specific social programs targeting households that still use firewood. Otherwise, these clean cooking programs may become regressive and only benefit the wealthier households.","PeriodicalId":51247,"journal":{"name":"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy","volume":"PP 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Household Socioeconomic Determinants of Clean Cooking Program in Ecuador\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Davi-Arderius, Moisés Obaco, R. Alvarado\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15567249.2022.2160525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Ecuador is a developing South American country that has highly subsidized liquid petroleum gas (LPG) since 1974. Between 2015 and 2020, LPG subsidies amounted to 260 M USD annually. In 2014, the Ecuadorean government implemented a clean cooking program, to encourage the replacement of LPG with electricity, mainly through induction stoves. However, the engagement rate in this program was lower than initially expected. This work investigates the socioeconomic and sociodemographic determinants of using various cooking technologies in Ecuador, including induction stoves. We use official Ecuadorian household surveys from 2015 to 2017 to gather information on gender, age, marital status, educational level, ethnicity, income family, family size, urban area, and province of residence. We then perform two econometric analyses, one using a probit model to study the determinants of having an induction stove, and the other employing a multilogit model to investigate the sociodemographic characteristics associated with the use of different cooking technologies, namely LPG, firewood, and electricity. Our results indicate that non-married individuals, Indigenous people, the poor, and those living in rooms or apartments with poor housing conditions show the lowest likelihood of having an induction stove. Moreover, the most disadvantaged groups still prefer firewood instead of the highly subsidized LPG barrels. We also find important differences across provinces. Our results give rise to several policy recommendations. Clean cooking programs should have a more regional approach and consider specific subsidies for the most disadvantaged groups. Moreover, the successful implementation of clean cooking programs may require the implementation of specific social programs targeting households that still use firewood. Otherwise, these clean cooking programs may become regressive and only benefit the wealthier households.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy\",\"volume\":\"PP 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2022.2160525\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2022.2160525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Household Socioeconomic Determinants of Clean Cooking Program in Ecuador
ABSTRACT Ecuador is a developing South American country that has highly subsidized liquid petroleum gas (LPG) since 1974. Between 2015 and 2020, LPG subsidies amounted to 260 M USD annually. In 2014, the Ecuadorean government implemented a clean cooking program, to encourage the replacement of LPG with electricity, mainly through induction stoves. However, the engagement rate in this program was lower than initially expected. This work investigates the socioeconomic and sociodemographic determinants of using various cooking technologies in Ecuador, including induction stoves. We use official Ecuadorian household surveys from 2015 to 2017 to gather information on gender, age, marital status, educational level, ethnicity, income family, family size, urban area, and province of residence. We then perform two econometric analyses, one using a probit model to study the determinants of having an induction stove, and the other employing a multilogit model to investigate the sociodemographic characteristics associated with the use of different cooking technologies, namely LPG, firewood, and electricity. Our results indicate that non-married individuals, Indigenous people, the poor, and those living in rooms or apartments with poor housing conditions show the lowest likelihood of having an induction stove. Moreover, the most disadvantaged groups still prefer firewood instead of the highly subsidized LPG barrels. We also find important differences across provinces. Our results give rise to several policy recommendations. Clean cooking programs should have a more regional approach and consider specific subsidies for the most disadvantaged groups. Moreover, the successful implementation of clean cooking programs may require the implementation of specific social programs targeting households that still use firewood. Otherwise, these clean cooking programs may become regressive and only benefit the wealthier households.
期刊介绍:
12 issues per year
Abstracted and/or indexed in: Applied Science & Technology Index; API Abstracts/Literature; Automatic Subject Index Citation; BIOSIS Previews; Cabell’s Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Economics and Finance; Chemical Abstracts; CSA Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts; CSA Environmental Sciences & Pollution Management Database; CSA Pollution Abstracts; Current Contents/Engineering, Technology & Applied Sciences; Directory of Industry Data Sources; Economic Abstracts; Electrical and Electronics Abstracts; Energy Information Abstracts; Energy Research Abstracts; Engineering Index Monthly; Environmental Abstracts; Environmental Periodicals Bibliography (EPB); International Abstracts in Operations Research; Operations/Research/Management Science Abstracts; Petroleum Abstracts; Physikalische Berichte; and Science Citation Index.
Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .