讽刺与定义

IF 1.2 3区 心理学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Conal Condren
{"title":"讽刺与定义","authors":"Conal Condren","doi":"10.1515/HUMOR-2012-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores some of the difficulties involved in defining satire. Neither the formal characteristics of satire nor its informing purposes, including its variable associations with humour and the provocation of amusement allow for a unifying definition over the long term. It considers a range of approaches to and types of definition and takes as a principle example the notion of Menippean satire. It argues that a characterisation in terms of family resemblance is more helpful for a strictly historical understanding than formal definitions and that it is misleading to take satire as a genre, let along a literary one. Throughout it also suggests that the case of satire tells us something about definition and the often naive expectations of what definitions can establish.","PeriodicalId":51635,"journal":{"name":"Humor-International Journal of Humor Research","volume":"PP 1","pages":"375-399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Satire and definition\",\"authors\":\"Conal Condren\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/HUMOR-2012-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores some of the difficulties involved in defining satire. Neither the formal characteristics of satire nor its informing purposes, including its variable associations with humour and the provocation of amusement allow for a unifying definition over the long term. It considers a range of approaches to and types of definition and takes as a principle example the notion of Menippean satire. It argues that a characterisation in terms of family resemblance is more helpful for a strictly historical understanding than formal definitions and that it is misleading to take satire as a genre, let along a literary one. Throughout it also suggests that the case of satire tells us something about definition and the often naive expectations of what definitions can establish.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Humor-International Journal of Humor Research\",\"volume\":\"PP 1\",\"pages\":\"375-399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Humor-International Journal of Humor Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR-2012-0019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humor-International Journal of Humor Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR-2012-0019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

摘要

本文探讨了定义讽刺的一些困难。无论是讽刺的正式特征,还是它的信息目的,包括它与幽默和娱乐的不同联系,都不允许一个长期的统一定义。它考虑了一系列的方法和类型的定义,并作为一个原则的例子,menipean讽刺的概念。它认为,与正式定义相比,从家族相似性的角度来描述讽刺作品的特征更有助于严格的历史理解,而且将讽刺作品视为一种体裁,更不用说文学体裁了,这是一种误导。自始至终,它也表明,讽刺的案例告诉我们一些关于定义的东西,以及对定义所能建立的东西的天真期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Satire and definition
This paper explores some of the difficulties involved in defining satire. Neither the formal characteristics of satire nor its informing purposes, including its variable associations with humour and the provocation of amusement allow for a unifying definition over the long term. It considers a range of approaches to and types of definition and takes as a principle example the notion of Menippean satire. It argues that a characterisation in terms of family resemblance is more helpful for a strictly historical understanding than formal definitions and that it is misleading to take satire as a genre, let along a literary one. Throughout it also suggests that the case of satire tells us something about definition and the often naive expectations of what definitions can establish.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信