{"title":"客座专栏:抽象论证框架中验证的复杂性","authors":"Dorothea Baumeister","doi":"10.1145/3173127.3173137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract argumentation frameworks introduced by Dung [Dun95] are a formal way of representing discussions de ned through arguments and a binary attack relation between them. In dynamic settings there is a need to allow for uncertainty in such argumentation frameworks, hence attack-incomplete and argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks are considered as well. Different semantics are de ned in order to identify a set of acceptable arguments, and the verification problem asks whether some given set is an extension for a given semantics. This survey gives an overview of the complexity of the verification problem for different semantics in complete and incomplete argumentation frameworks.","PeriodicalId":22106,"journal":{"name":"SIGACT News","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guest Column: Complexity of Verication in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks\",\"authors\":\"Dorothea Baumeister\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3173127.3173137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract argumentation frameworks introduced by Dung [Dun95] are a formal way of representing discussions de ned through arguments and a binary attack relation between them. In dynamic settings there is a need to allow for uncertainty in such argumentation frameworks, hence attack-incomplete and argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks are considered as well. Different semantics are de ned in order to identify a set of acceptable arguments, and the verification problem asks whether some given set is an extension for a given semantics. This survey gives an overview of the complexity of the verification problem for different semantics in complete and incomplete argumentation frameworks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGACT News\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGACT News\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3173127.3173137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGACT News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3173127.3173137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Guest Column: Complexity of Verication in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
Abstract argumentation frameworks introduced by Dung [Dun95] are a formal way of representing discussions de ned through arguments and a binary attack relation between them. In dynamic settings there is a need to allow for uncertainty in such argumentation frameworks, hence attack-incomplete and argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks are considered as well. Different semantics are de ned in order to identify a set of acceptable arguments, and the verification problem asks whether some given set is an extension for a given semantics. This survey gives an overview of the complexity of the verification problem for different semantics in complete and incomplete argumentation frameworks.