皮肤科住院医师项目中的接触性皮炎教育:美国接触性皮炎协会能(将)成为改善的力量吗?

W. High, P. Cruz
{"title":"皮肤科住院医师项目中的接触性皮炎教育:美国接触性皮炎协会能(将)成为改善的力量吗?","authors":"W. High, P. Cruz","doi":"10.1097/01206501-200312000-00004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nContact dermatitis accounts for a considerable portion of outpatient clinic visits to dermatologists. The state of education in contact dermatitis at the level of dermatology residency training in the United States has not been examined.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo assess the state of education in contact dermatitis in dermatology residency programs in the United States.\n\n\nMETHOD\nCross-sectional survey of directors and chief residents of 105 dermatology training programs accredited by the American College of Graduate Medical Education.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSeventy-seven percent of directors and 74% of chief residents responded to the survey. In general, both sets of respondents gave concordant responses although responses from directors were more positive. With respect to didactic education, the vast majority of programs (> 73%) held lecture conferences on contact dermatitis. Less than one-third included contact dermatitis-focused journals in journal club conferences. A bare majority of programs (57% of directors, 53% of chief residents) identified a faculty expert in contact dermatitis, with almost all experts conducting patch-test clinics and providing lectures on contact dermatitis. Seventy-five percent of experts were members of the American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS). Although residents in most programs (> 78%) performed patch tests to diagnose contact dermatitis, there were 14 programs in which none of their graduates performed such tests. Moreover, only 27% of programs had rotations dedicated to contact dermatitis and/or patch testing. Finally, directors and chief residents predicted that most graduates will incorporate the TRUE Test and not the more extensive or customized patch tests in their practices.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nSeveral opportunities for improving contact dermatitis education in residency programs were identified, including recruitment or development of more faculty experts in contact dermatitis, creation of rotations dedicated to contact dermatitis, and greater inclusion of contact dermatitis-focused journals in journal club conferences. As the principal interest group for contact dermatitis in the United States, the ACDS is the logical organization to spearhead improvement of contact dermatitis education in residency programs.","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contact dermatitis education in dermatology residency programs: can (will) the American Contact Dermatitis Society be a force for improvement?\",\"authors\":\"W. High, P. Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01206501-200312000-00004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nContact dermatitis accounts for a considerable portion of outpatient clinic visits to dermatologists. The state of education in contact dermatitis at the level of dermatology residency training in the United States has not been examined.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVE\\nTo assess the state of education in contact dermatitis in dermatology residency programs in the United States.\\n\\n\\nMETHOD\\nCross-sectional survey of directors and chief residents of 105 dermatology training programs accredited by the American College of Graduate Medical Education.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nSeventy-seven percent of directors and 74% of chief residents responded to the survey. In general, both sets of respondents gave concordant responses although responses from directors were more positive. With respect to didactic education, the vast majority of programs (> 73%) held lecture conferences on contact dermatitis. Less than one-third included contact dermatitis-focused journals in journal club conferences. A bare majority of programs (57% of directors, 53% of chief residents) identified a faculty expert in contact dermatitis, with almost all experts conducting patch-test clinics and providing lectures on contact dermatitis. Seventy-five percent of experts were members of the American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS). Although residents in most programs (> 78%) performed patch tests to diagnose contact dermatitis, there were 14 programs in which none of their graduates performed such tests. Moreover, only 27% of programs had rotations dedicated to contact dermatitis and/or patch testing. Finally, directors and chief residents predicted that most graduates will incorporate the TRUE Test and not the more extensive or customized patch tests in their practices.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nSeveral opportunities for improving contact dermatitis education in residency programs were identified, including recruitment or development of more faculty experts in contact dermatitis, creation of rotations dedicated to contact dermatitis, and greater inclusion of contact dermatitis-focused journals in journal club conferences. As the principal interest group for contact dermatitis in the United States, the ACDS is the logical organization to spearhead improvement of contact dermatitis education in residency programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01206501-200312000-00004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01206501-200312000-00004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:接触性皮炎在皮肤科医生门诊就诊中占相当大的比例。美国皮肤科住院医师培训水平的接触性皮炎教育状况尚未得到调查。目的评估美国皮肤科住院医师接触性皮炎的教育状况。方法对105个美国研究生医学教育学院认可的皮肤科培训项目的主任和总住院医师进行横断面调查。结果77%的主任医师和74%的总住院医师回应了调查。总体而言,两组受访者给出了一致的回应,尽管董事的回应更为积极。在教学教育方面,绝大多数项目(bbbb73%)举办了接触性皮炎讲座会议。不到三分之一的期刊俱乐部会议收录了以接触性皮炎为主题的期刊。绝大多数项目(57%的主任,53%的总住院医师)都有一位接触性皮炎的专家,几乎所有的专家都进行了接触性皮炎的局部测试和讲座。75%的专家是美国接触性皮炎协会(ACDS)的成员。虽然大多数项目的住院医生(约占78%)都进行了斑贴试验来诊断接触性皮炎,但有14个项目的毕业生都没有进行过这种试验。此外,只有27%的项目有专门针对接触性皮炎和/或斑贴试验的轮转。最后,主任和总住院医师预测,大多数毕业生将在他们的实践中采用TRUE测试,而不是更广泛或定制的补丁测试。结论:在住院医师项目中,有几个改善接触性皮炎教育的机会,包括招募或发展更多的接触性皮炎教师专家,创建专门的接触性皮炎轮换,以及在期刊俱乐部会议中更多地纳入接触性皮炎期刊。作为美国接触性皮炎的主要利益团体,ACDS是在住院医师项目中率先改善接触性皮炎教育的合乎逻辑的组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contact dermatitis education in dermatology residency programs: can (will) the American Contact Dermatitis Society be a force for improvement?
BACKGROUND Contact dermatitis accounts for a considerable portion of outpatient clinic visits to dermatologists. The state of education in contact dermatitis at the level of dermatology residency training in the United States has not been examined. OBJECTIVE To assess the state of education in contact dermatitis in dermatology residency programs in the United States. METHOD Cross-sectional survey of directors and chief residents of 105 dermatology training programs accredited by the American College of Graduate Medical Education. RESULTS Seventy-seven percent of directors and 74% of chief residents responded to the survey. In general, both sets of respondents gave concordant responses although responses from directors were more positive. With respect to didactic education, the vast majority of programs (> 73%) held lecture conferences on contact dermatitis. Less than one-third included contact dermatitis-focused journals in journal club conferences. A bare majority of programs (57% of directors, 53% of chief residents) identified a faculty expert in contact dermatitis, with almost all experts conducting patch-test clinics and providing lectures on contact dermatitis. Seventy-five percent of experts were members of the American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS). Although residents in most programs (> 78%) performed patch tests to diagnose contact dermatitis, there were 14 programs in which none of their graduates performed such tests. Moreover, only 27% of programs had rotations dedicated to contact dermatitis and/or patch testing. Finally, directors and chief residents predicted that most graduates will incorporate the TRUE Test and not the more extensive or customized patch tests in their practices. CONCLUSIONS Several opportunities for improving contact dermatitis education in residency programs were identified, including recruitment or development of more faculty experts in contact dermatitis, creation of rotations dedicated to contact dermatitis, and greater inclusion of contact dermatitis-focused journals in journal club conferences. As the principal interest group for contact dermatitis in the United States, the ACDS is the logical organization to spearhead improvement of contact dermatitis education in residency programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信