{"title":"认知偏差对预测模型的影响","authors":"Panayiotis Theodossiou, Polina Ellina","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3756478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact of the cognitive biases of overconfidence, underconfidence and anchoring on the distribution of errors of forecasting models is analyzed using an analytical framework based on a flexible two-piece generalized distribution. The total forecasting bias, measured by the expected value of a model’s errors, is decomposed to an anchoring bias and a skewness bias. An examination of BEA’s preliminary estimates of the final GDP growth rates reveals that the underprediction present is to a large extent the result of negative skewness bias and to a lesser extent of negative anchoring bias. The latter are attributes of underconfident forecasters.","PeriodicalId":8731,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Cognitive Biases on Forecasting Models\",\"authors\":\"Panayiotis Theodossiou, Polina Ellina\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3756478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The impact of the cognitive biases of overconfidence, underconfidence and anchoring on the distribution of errors of forecasting models is analyzed using an analytical framework based on a flexible two-piece generalized distribution. The total forecasting bias, measured by the expected value of a model’s errors, is decomposed to an anchoring bias and a skewness bias. An examination of BEA’s preliminary estimates of the final GDP growth rates reveals that the underprediction present is to a large extent the result of negative skewness bias and to a lesser extent of negative anchoring bias. The latter are attributes of underconfident forecasters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3756478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3756478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of the cognitive biases of overconfidence, underconfidence and anchoring on the distribution of errors of forecasting models is analyzed using an analytical framework based on a flexible two-piece generalized distribution. The total forecasting bias, measured by the expected value of a model’s errors, is decomposed to an anchoring bias and a skewness bias. An examination of BEA’s preliminary estimates of the final GDP growth rates reveals that the underprediction present is to a large extent the result of negative skewness bias and to a lesser extent of negative anchoring bias. The latter are attributes of underconfident forecasters.