人的行为和人的设计:奥地利设计科学的方法

Mark D. Packard , Per L. Bylund , Peter G. Klein
{"title":"人的行为和人的设计:奥地利设计科学的方法","authors":"Mark D. Packard ,&nbsp;Per L. Bylund ,&nbsp;Peter G. Klein","doi":"10.1016/j.jbvd.2021.100003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As design science advances into the foreground of entrepreneurship theory, we see a meta-theoretical tension between Simon's classic exposition of design and entrepreneurship theory's foundations within the Austrian school of economics. To resolve this tension, we argue that design science is mispositioned atop the conventional positivism that Simon embraced and is much better aligned with Austrian-style subjectivism of values, knowledge, and expectations. We elaborate design themes from classical contributions to Austrian economics to lay foundations for an “Austrian” approach to design. We conclude by illustrating how design processes are foundational to Austrian market theory and the Austrian theory of the firm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing Design","volume":"1 1","pages":"Article 100003"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667277421000025/pdfft?md5=e830d3f0148c7198ee0a2dd0afb13bcc&pid=1-s2.0-S2667277421000025-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human action and human design: An Austrian approach to design science\",\"authors\":\"Mark D. Packard ,&nbsp;Per L. Bylund ,&nbsp;Peter G. Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbvd.2021.100003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As design science advances into the foreground of entrepreneurship theory, we see a meta-theoretical tension between Simon's classic exposition of design and entrepreneurship theory's foundations within the Austrian school of economics. To resolve this tension, we argue that design science is mispositioned atop the conventional positivism that Simon embraced and is much better aligned with Austrian-style subjectivism of values, knowledge, and expectations. We elaborate design themes from classical contributions to Austrian economics to lay foundations for an “Austrian” approach to design. We conclude by illustrating how design processes are foundational to Austrian market theory and the Austrian theory of the firm.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Design\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667277421000025/pdfft?md5=e830d3f0148c7198ee0a2dd0afb13bcc&pid=1-s2.0-S2667277421000025-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667277421000025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667277421000025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

随着设计科学进入创业理论的前景,我们看到西蒙对设计的经典阐述与奥地利经济学派的创业理论基础之间的元理论张力。为了解决这种紧张关系,我们认为设计科学被错误地定位在西蒙所接受的传统实证主义之上,它与奥地利风格的价值观、知识和期望的主观主义更加一致。我们从奥地利经济学的经典贡献中阐述设计主题,为“奥地利”设计方法奠定基础。最后,我们说明了设计过程如何成为奥地利市场理论和奥地利企业理论的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human action and human design: An Austrian approach to design science

As design science advances into the foreground of entrepreneurship theory, we see a meta-theoretical tension between Simon's classic exposition of design and entrepreneurship theory's foundations within the Austrian school of economics. To resolve this tension, we argue that design science is mispositioned atop the conventional positivism that Simon embraced and is much better aligned with Austrian-style subjectivism of values, knowledge, and expectations. We elaborate design themes from classical contributions to Austrian economics to lay foundations for an “Austrian” approach to design. We conclude by illustrating how design processes are foundational to Austrian market theory and the Austrian theory of the firm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信