人工智能和进入专利制度

W. Robinson
{"title":"人工智能和进入专利制度","authors":"W. Robinson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3580850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How likely is it that the average American will become an inventor? With a novel idea and hard work it should be a possibility for all Americans. The data suggests otherwise. Most patents are obtained by inventors that work for large corporations. Small businesses, solo inventors, women, and minorities lag behind their counterparts in patenting. A common explanation for this phenomenon is that it is a “pipeline” issue. However, evidence suggest that the patent system is not accessible to underrepresented innovators for more problematic reasons. \n \nAt almost the same time as information about the concentration of patenting activity has garnered attention, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) has become more vocal about its interest in Artificial Intelligence (“AI”). AI will transform how the USPTO examines patent applications. It may also transform how people invent. What has been absent from the conversation about AI and patenting is the negative effect AI has had when introduced in other social systems. For example, AI models can exhibit bias that concentrates power around incumbents. In addition, leaders overestimate the ability of AI models to solve human issues. This Article refers to these problems collectively as “AI enthusiasm.” \n \nThis Article argues that AI enthusiasm threatens to make the patent system less accessible for underrepresented innovators. In response, this article presents a framework for improving access to the patent system given the emergence of AU. First, limits must be placed on AI assisted examination informed by best practices that combat AI bias. Second, the USPTO should grant patents to inventions that are created with the assistance of AI only if the AI involved adheres to a set of best practices that reduce the chance of biased outcomes. Finally, true access involves removing obstacles to the innovation culture that has historically been closed to underrepresented inventors. Thus, AI tools should be deployed to assist underrepresented innovators in the patenting process. Collectively, these measures may provide U.S. innovators from all walks of life the opportunity to call themselves an inventor.","PeriodicalId":89488,"journal":{"name":"The electronic journal of human sexuality","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence and Access to the Patent System\",\"authors\":\"W. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3580850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How likely is it that the average American will become an inventor? With a novel idea and hard work it should be a possibility for all Americans. The data suggests otherwise. Most patents are obtained by inventors that work for large corporations. Small businesses, solo inventors, women, and minorities lag behind their counterparts in patenting. A common explanation for this phenomenon is that it is a “pipeline” issue. However, evidence suggest that the patent system is not accessible to underrepresented innovators for more problematic reasons. \\n \\nAt almost the same time as information about the concentration of patenting activity has garnered attention, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) has become more vocal about its interest in Artificial Intelligence (“AI”). AI will transform how the USPTO examines patent applications. It may also transform how people invent. What has been absent from the conversation about AI and patenting is the negative effect AI has had when introduced in other social systems. For example, AI models can exhibit bias that concentrates power around incumbents. In addition, leaders overestimate the ability of AI models to solve human issues. This Article refers to these problems collectively as “AI enthusiasm.” \\n \\nThis Article argues that AI enthusiasm threatens to make the patent system less accessible for underrepresented innovators. In response, this article presents a framework for improving access to the patent system given the emergence of AU. First, limits must be placed on AI assisted examination informed by best practices that combat AI bias. Second, the USPTO should grant patents to inventions that are created with the assistance of AI only if the AI involved adheres to a set of best practices that reduce the chance of biased outcomes. Finally, true access involves removing obstacles to the innovation culture that has historically been closed to underrepresented inventors. Thus, AI tools should be deployed to assist underrepresented innovators in the patenting process. Collectively, these measures may provide U.S. innovators from all walks of life the opportunity to call themselves an inventor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The electronic journal of human sexuality\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The electronic journal of human sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3580850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The electronic journal of human sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3580850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

普通美国人成为发明家的可能性有多大?只要有一个新颖的想法和努力工作,这应该是所有美国人都有可能实现的。数据显示并非如此。大多数专利是由为大公司工作的发明者获得的。小企业、独立发明人、女性和少数族裔在申请专利方面落后于同行。对这种现象的常见解释是,这是一个“管道”问题。然而,有证据表明,由于更多有问题的原因,未被充分代表的创新者无法获得专利制度。几乎在有关专利活动集中度的信息引起人们关注的同时,美国专利商标局(USPTO)对人工智能(AI)的兴趣也越来越明显。人工智能将改变美国专利商标局审查专利申请的方式。它还可能改变人们的发明方式。关于人工智能和专利的讨论中缺少的是人工智能在其他社会系统中引入时所产生的负面影响。例如,人工智能模型可能会表现出将权力集中在现有企业身上的偏见。此外,领导者高估了人工智能模型解决人类问题的能力。本文将这些问题统称为“人工智能热情”。本文认为,对人工智能的热情可能会使未被充分代表的创新者更难获得专利制度。作为回应,本文提出了一个在非盟出现的情况下改善专利制度获取的框架。首先,必须根据对抗人工智能偏见的最佳实践,对人工智能辅助检查进行限制。其次,美国专利商标局应该授予在人工智能帮助下创造的发明专利,前提是所涉及的人工智能遵守一套减少结果偏差可能性的最佳实践。最后,真正的准入涉及消除创新文化的障碍,这种文化历来对代表性不足的发明家是封闭的。因此,应该部署人工智能工具来帮助在专利申请过程中代表性不足的创新者。总的来说,这些措施可能会为美国各行各业的创新者提供称自己为发明家的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence and Access to the Patent System
How likely is it that the average American will become an inventor? With a novel idea and hard work it should be a possibility for all Americans. The data suggests otherwise. Most patents are obtained by inventors that work for large corporations. Small businesses, solo inventors, women, and minorities lag behind their counterparts in patenting. A common explanation for this phenomenon is that it is a “pipeline” issue. However, evidence suggest that the patent system is not accessible to underrepresented innovators for more problematic reasons. At almost the same time as information about the concentration of patenting activity has garnered attention, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) has become more vocal about its interest in Artificial Intelligence (“AI”). AI will transform how the USPTO examines patent applications. It may also transform how people invent. What has been absent from the conversation about AI and patenting is the negative effect AI has had when introduced in other social systems. For example, AI models can exhibit bias that concentrates power around incumbents. In addition, leaders overestimate the ability of AI models to solve human issues. This Article refers to these problems collectively as “AI enthusiasm.” This Article argues that AI enthusiasm threatens to make the patent system less accessible for underrepresented innovators. In response, this article presents a framework for improving access to the patent system given the emergence of AU. First, limits must be placed on AI assisted examination informed by best practices that combat AI bias. Second, the USPTO should grant patents to inventions that are created with the assistance of AI only if the AI involved adheres to a set of best practices that reduce the chance of biased outcomes. Finally, true access involves removing obstacles to the innovation culture that has historically been closed to underrepresented inventors. Thus, AI tools should be deployed to assist underrepresented innovators in the patenting process. Collectively, these measures may provide U.S. innovators from all walks of life the opportunity to call themselves an inventor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信