倡导学习:替代解决方案提高学生在21世纪的学习成绩

'Aabidah Ummu 'Aziizah, Nisa Bella, Ibrahim Ibrahim
{"title":"倡导学习:替代解决方案提高学生在21世纪的学习成绩","authors":"'Aabidah Ummu 'Aziizah, Nisa Bella, Ibrahim Ibrahim","doi":"10.37680/qalamuna.v13i2.886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the extent of the development of the implementation of advocacy learning and develop it as an alternative solution in improving student learning outcomes in the 21st century. This research method uses qualitative research with a library research approach and is descriptive in nature and applies the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. Data collection is done by looking at previous research empirically whether it is qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods. Meanwhile, the analysis and evaluation of the data was carried out using a data table containing the classification of previous researches focused on each discussion of the keywords in this study. The results of this study indicate that (1) research on advocacy learning models still revolves around a micro scope which is limited in its application to debate activities and subject matters that are open-ended and only focused on the student's point of view (2) The development of advocacy learning models can be done through macro actualization of advocacy models on various learning methods and not only limited to exact or non-exact topics, open-ended or closed-ended and advocacy model reviews can be intended for two points of view, namely teachers and students.","PeriodicalId":34373,"journal":{"name":"Qalamuna","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PEMBELAJARAN ADVOKASI: Solusi Alternatif Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa di Abad 21\",\"authors\":\"'Aabidah Ummu 'Aziizah, Nisa Bella, Ibrahim Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.37680/qalamuna.v13i2.886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine the extent of the development of the implementation of advocacy learning and develop it as an alternative solution in improving student learning outcomes in the 21st century. This research method uses qualitative research with a library research approach and is descriptive in nature and applies the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. Data collection is done by looking at previous research empirically whether it is qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods. Meanwhile, the analysis and evaluation of the data was carried out using a data table containing the classification of previous researches focused on each discussion of the keywords in this study. The results of this study indicate that (1) research on advocacy learning models still revolves around a micro scope which is limited in its application to debate activities and subject matters that are open-ended and only focused on the student's point of view (2) The development of advocacy learning models can be done through macro actualization of advocacy models on various learning methods and not only limited to exact or non-exact topics, open-ended or closed-ended and advocacy model reviews can be intended for two points of view, namely teachers and students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qalamuna\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qalamuna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v13i2.886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qalamuna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v13i2.886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定倡导学习的实施发展程度,并将其发展为改善21世纪学生学习成果的替代解决方案。该研究方法采用定性研究和图书馆研究方法,本质上是描述性的,并采用系统文献综述(SLR)方法。数据收集是通过观察以往的实证研究来完成的,无论是定性的,定量的还是混合的方法。同时,使用数据表对数据进行分析和评价,该数据表包含了针对本研究中每个关键词讨论的先前研究的分类。本研究结果表明:(1)倡导学习模式的研究仍停留在微观层面,其应用局限于开放性的辩论活动和主题,仅关注学生的观点;(2)倡导学习模式的发展可以通过倡导模型在各种学习方法上的宏观实现,而不仅仅局限于精确或非精确的主题;开放式或封闭式和倡导模式的审查可以针对两种观点,即教师和学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PEMBELAJARAN ADVOKASI: Solusi Alternatif Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa di Abad 21
This study aims to determine the extent of the development of the implementation of advocacy learning and develop it as an alternative solution in improving student learning outcomes in the 21st century. This research method uses qualitative research with a library research approach and is descriptive in nature and applies the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. Data collection is done by looking at previous research empirically whether it is qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods. Meanwhile, the analysis and evaluation of the data was carried out using a data table containing the classification of previous researches focused on each discussion of the keywords in this study. The results of this study indicate that (1) research on advocacy learning models still revolves around a micro scope which is limited in its application to debate activities and subject matters that are open-ended and only focused on the student's point of view (2) The development of advocacy learning models can be done through macro actualization of advocacy models on various learning methods and not only limited to exact or non-exact topics, open-ended or closed-ended and advocacy model reviews can be intended for two points of view, namely teachers and students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信