铁充氢三种不同试验方法的评价

Metals technology Pub Date : 1983-01-01 DOI:10.1179/030716983803291695

S. Chan, M. Martínez-Madrid, J. A. Charles

{"title":"铁充氢三种不同试验方法的评价","authors":"S. Chan, M. Martínez-Madrid, J. A. Charles","doi":"10.1179/030716983803291695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractTests have been carried out to compare the reproducibility of potentiostatic and galvanostatic electrolytic methods, and the NACE corrosion-solution method for the introduction of hydrogen into iron specimens. It is concluded that the NACE solution gives the most consistent results, particularly at high hydrogen concentrations where the electrolytic techniques are likely to produce blistering.","PeriodicalId":18409,"journal":{"name":"Metals technology","volume":"54 1","pages":"464-470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of three different test methods for charging hydrogen into iron\",\"authors\":\"S. Chan, M. Martínez-Madrid, J. A. Charles\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/030716983803291695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractTests have been carried out to compare the reproducibility of potentiostatic and galvanostatic electrolytic methods, and the NACE corrosion-solution method for the introduction of hydrogen into iron specimens. It is concluded that the NACE solution gives the most consistent results, particularly at high hydrogen concentrations where the electrolytic techniques are likely to produce blistering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metals technology\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"464-470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metals technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/030716983803291695\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metals technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/030716983803291695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

摘要对恒电位电解法和恒流电解法以及NACE腐蚀溶液法在铁试样中引入氢的重现性进行了试验比较。结论是，NACE溶液提供了最一致的结果，特别是在高氢浓度下，电解技术可能产生起泡。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evaluation of three different test methods for charging hydrogen into iron

AbstractTests have been carried out to compare the reproducibility of potentiostatic and galvanostatic electrolytic methods, and the NACE corrosion-solution method for the introduction of hydrogen into iron specimens. It is concluded that the NACE solution gives the most consistent results, particularly at high hydrogen concentrations where the electrolytic techniques are likely to produce blistering.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Metals technology

自引率

0.00%

发文量