四:在法庭上陈述1475

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Gabriela Signori
{"title":"四:在法庭上陈述1475","authors":"Gabriela Signori","doi":"10.1515/zrgg-2023-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Since the 13th century, the interrogation of witnesses has been firmly anchored in medieval finding of justice. Theory and practice are in a reciprocal relationship with society, which recurs to testimonies in order to find justice. The level of reflection in the law books is high. Particular attention is paid to the question of who must be excluded from the witness stand, whereas the question of who is suitable is of secondary interest. On the one hand, the law books identify groups of people who are to be excluded, on the other hand, they discuss time-specific forms of social solidarities and hostilities from which bias results. In legal practice, the relationship between law and society presents itself as a tense one. As in Marseille (14th century), the balance can be favoured by the procedure (catalogue of questions) in favour of society, and social solidarities can homogenise the witness depositions. But the same procedure can also individualise them in the sense of the law, as in Aragón in the 15th and 16th century. In the late medieval Rhine metropolis of Basel, on which this contribution focusses, the balance also turns out in favour of the law, though the individual testimony does not follow a fixed grid of questions.","PeriodicalId":39347,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung","volume":"61 1","pages":"170 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IV. Erzählen vor Gericht: Die Basler Zeugenverhörprotokolle der Jahre 1475–1480\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Signori\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zrgg-2023-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Since the 13th century, the interrogation of witnesses has been firmly anchored in medieval finding of justice. Theory and practice are in a reciprocal relationship with society, which recurs to testimonies in order to find justice. The level of reflection in the law books is high. Particular attention is paid to the question of who must be excluded from the witness stand, whereas the question of who is suitable is of secondary interest. On the one hand, the law books identify groups of people who are to be excluded, on the other hand, they discuss time-specific forms of social solidarities and hostilities from which bias results. In legal practice, the relationship between law and society presents itself as a tense one. As in Marseille (14th century), the balance can be favoured by the procedure (catalogue of questions) in favour of society, and social solidarities can homogenise the witness depositions. But the same procedure can also individualise them in the sense of the law, as in Aragón in the 15th and 16th century. In the late medieval Rhine metropolis of Basel, on which this contribution focusses, the balance also turns out in favour of the law, though the individual testimony does not follow a fixed grid of questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"170 - 207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgg-2023-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgg-2023-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自13世纪以来,对证人的审讯一直被牢牢地固定在中世纪寻求正义的基础上。理论和实践与社会是一种相互关系,社会为了寻求正义而反复出现在证词中。法律书籍中的反思水平很高。特别注意的是谁必须被排除在证人席之外的问题,而谁是合适的问题则是次要的。一方面,法律书籍确定了应被排除在外的人群,另一方面,它们讨论了导致偏见的特定时间的社会团结和敌对形式。在法律实践中,法律与社会的关系表现为一种紧张的关系。就像在马赛(14世纪)一样,有利于社会的程序(问题目录)可以有利于平衡,社会团结可以使证人证词同质化。但同样的程序也可以使他们在法律意义上个性化,就像15和16世纪的Aragón一样。在中世纪晚期的莱茵河大都会巴塞尔,尽管个人证词并不遵循固定的问题网格,但天平也倾向于法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IV. Erzählen vor Gericht: Die Basler Zeugenverhörprotokolle der Jahre 1475–1480
Summary Since the 13th century, the interrogation of witnesses has been firmly anchored in medieval finding of justice. Theory and practice are in a reciprocal relationship with society, which recurs to testimonies in order to find justice. The level of reflection in the law books is high. Particular attention is paid to the question of who must be excluded from the witness stand, whereas the question of who is suitable is of secondary interest. On the one hand, the law books identify groups of people who are to be excluded, on the other hand, they discuss time-specific forms of social solidarities and hostilities from which bias results. In legal practice, the relationship between law and society presents itself as a tense one. As in Marseille (14th century), the balance can be favoured by the procedure (catalogue of questions) in favour of society, and social solidarities can homogenise the witness depositions. But the same procedure can also individualise them in the sense of the law, as in Aragón in the 15th and 16th century. In the late medieval Rhine metropolis of Basel, on which this contribution focusses, the balance also turns out in favour of the law, though the individual testimony does not follow a fixed grid of questions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信