{"title":"利用因子模型和桥式方程预测墨西哥季度GDP","authors":"O. Gálvez-Soriano","doi":"10.24201/EE.V35I2.402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Short term forecasts of GDP have become a necessary practice among central banks in order to take better informed monetary policy decisions. In this paper, I evaluate five nowcasting models that I used to forecast Mexico's quarterly GDP in the short run: a dynamic factor model (DFM), two bridge equation (BE) models and two models based on principal components analysis (PCA). The results indicate that the average of the two BE forecasts is statistically better than the rest of the models under consideration, according to the Diebold-Mariano accuracy test (Diebold and Mariano, 1995). Using real-time information, I show that the average of the BE models is also more accurate than the median of the forecasts provided by the analysts surveyed by Bloomberg, the median of the experts who answer Banco de Mexico’s Survey of Professional Forecasters and the rapid GDP estimate released by INEGI.","PeriodicalId":43766,"journal":{"name":"Estudios De Economia","volume":"56 1","pages":"213-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nowcasting Mexico’s quarterly GDP using factor models and bridge equations\",\"authors\":\"O. Gálvez-Soriano\",\"doi\":\"10.24201/EE.V35I2.402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Short term forecasts of GDP have become a necessary practice among central banks in order to take better informed monetary policy decisions. In this paper, I evaluate five nowcasting models that I used to forecast Mexico's quarterly GDP in the short run: a dynamic factor model (DFM), two bridge equation (BE) models and two models based on principal components analysis (PCA). The results indicate that the average of the two BE forecasts is statistically better than the rest of the models under consideration, according to the Diebold-Mariano accuracy test (Diebold and Mariano, 1995). Using real-time information, I show that the average of the BE models is also more accurate than the median of the forecasts provided by the analysts surveyed by Bloomberg, the median of the experts who answer Banco de Mexico’s Survey of Professional Forecasters and the rapid GDP estimate released by INEGI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios De Economia\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"213-265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios De Economia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24201/EE.V35I2.402\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios De Economia","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24201/EE.V35I2.402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
国内生产总值的短期预测已成为各国央行采取更明智的货币政策决策的必要做法。在本文中,我评估了我用来预测墨西哥短期季度GDP的五个临近预测模型:一个动态因素模型(DFM),两个桥梁方程(BE)模型和两个基于主成分分析(PCA)的模型。结果表明,根据Diebold-Mariano精度检验(Diebold and Mariano, 1995),两种BE预测的平均值在统计上优于所考虑的其他模型。通过使用实时信息,我发现BE模型的平均值也比彭博社(Bloomberg)调查的分析师给出的预测中值、回答墨西哥银行(Banco de Mexico)专业预测者调查的专家给出的预测中值和国家经济研究所(INEGI)发布的快速GDP预测中值更准确。
Nowcasting Mexico’s quarterly GDP using factor models and bridge equations
Short term forecasts of GDP have become a necessary practice among central banks in order to take better informed monetary policy decisions. In this paper, I evaluate five nowcasting models that I used to forecast Mexico's quarterly GDP in the short run: a dynamic factor model (DFM), two bridge equation (BE) models and two models based on principal components analysis (PCA). The results indicate that the average of the two BE forecasts is statistically better than the rest of the models under consideration, according to the Diebold-Mariano accuracy test (Diebold and Mariano, 1995). Using real-time information, I show that the average of the BE models is also more accurate than the median of the forecasts provided by the analysts surveyed by Bloomberg, the median of the experts who answer Banco de Mexico’s Survey of Professional Forecasters and the rapid GDP estimate released by INEGI.