时间与阅读的物质性

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
P. Arseniev
{"title":"时间与阅读的物质性","authors":"P. Arseniev","doi":"10.58186/2782-3660-2022-2-5-193-208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review is devoted to several events that took place in the field of the study of the materiality of reading at the round table of the Higher School of Social Research (École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales), held at the Alcazar Library in Marseille. The organisers of the round table designated its topic as “Reading Time” (Le temps de la lecture). The second element of the review was the recent publication of a book by André Frejomil “Art of the Poacher: a Material history of reading according to Michel de Certeau” (Arts de braconner: une histoire matérielle de la lecture chez Michel de Certeau). The material history of reading, an activity rather perceived as immaterial, comes methodologically from analysis of Michel Foucault’s discourse. As such it is sensitive not only to the materiality of the signs placed on the page, but also to the context of the publication that determines the meaning of what is being read (and not only written and “programmed” by the author). It restores the rights of the material bearers of texts and considers them, along with the techniques of the body-at-reading, as factors involved in the deployment of procedures of comprehension. The material history of reading allows us to see our object as an empirical, social and historically contextualised practice involved in certain communities — not only “interpretative” communities but also in those that could be called “motor”.","PeriodicalId":41258,"journal":{"name":"Versus-Quaderni di Studi Semiotici","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time and the Materiality of Reading\",\"authors\":\"P. Arseniev\",\"doi\":\"10.58186/2782-3660-2022-2-5-193-208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review is devoted to several events that took place in the field of the study of the materiality of reading at the round table of the Higher School of Social Research (École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales), held at the Alcazar Library in Marseille. The organisers of the round table designated its topic as “Reading Time” (Le temps de la lecture). The second element of the review was the recent publication of a book by André Frejomil “Art of the Poacher: a Material history of reading according to Michel de Certeau” (Arts de braconner: une histoire matérielle de la lecture chez Michel de Certeau). The material history of reading, an activity rather perceived as immaterial, comes methodologically from analysis of Michel Foucault’s discourse. As such it is sensitive not only to the materiality of the signs placed on the page, but also to the context of the publication that determines the meaning of what is being read (and not only written and “programmed” by the author). It restores the rights of the material bearers of texts and considers them, along with the techniques of the body-at-reading, as factors involved in the deployment of procedures of comprehension. The material history of reading allows us to see our object as an empirical, social and historically contextualised practice involved in certain communities — not only “interpretative” communities but also in those that could be called “motor”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Versus-Quaderni di Studi Semiotici\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Versus-Quaderni di Studi Semiotici\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58186/2782-3660-2022-2-5-193-208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Versus-Quaderni di Studi Semiotici","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58186/2782-3660-2022-2-5-193-208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇综述专门讨论了在马赛Alcazar图书馆举行的高等社会研究学院(École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales)圆桌会议上关于阅读重要性研究领域发生的几个事件。圆桌会议的组织者将其主题定为“阅读时间”(Le temps de la lecture)。评论的第二个内容是安德列·弗雷若米尔最近出版的一本书《偷猎者的艺术:米歇尔·德·塞托的阅读材料史》(Arts de braconner: une histoire matrielle de la lecture chez Michel de Certeau)。阅读的物质历史,一种被视为非物质的活动,在方法论上来自对米歇尔·福柯话语的分析。因此,它不仅对放置在页面上的符号的重要性敏感,而且对出版物的上下文敏感,这决定了正在阅读的内容的意义(而不仅仅是作者写的和“编程”)。它恢复了文本材料持有者的权利,并将其与身体阅读技巧一起视为部署理解程序所涉及的因素。阅读的物质历史让我们看到,我们的对象是一种经验的、社会的和历史语境化的实践,它涉及到某些社区——不仅是“解释性”社区,也包括那些可以被称为“运动性”的社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time and the Materiality of Reading
This review is devoted to several events that took place in the field of the study of the materiality of reading at the round table of the Higher School of Social Research (École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales), held at the Alcazar Library in Marseille. The organisers of the round table designated its topic as “Reading Time” (Le temps de la lecture). The second element of the review was the recent publication of a book by André Frejomil “Art of the Poacher: a Material history of reading according to Michel de Certeau” (Arts de braconner: une histoire matérielle de la lecture chez Michel de Certeau). The material history of reading, an activity rather perceived as immaterial, comes methodologically from analysis of Michel Foucault’s discourse. As such it is sensitive not only to the materiality of the signs placed on the page, but also to the context of the publication that determines the meaning of what is being read (and not only written and “programmed” by the author). It restores the rights of the material bearers of texts and considers them, along with the techniques of the body-at-reading, as factors involved in the deployment of procedures of comprehension. The material history of reading allows us to see our object as an empirical, social and historically contextualised practice involved in certain communities — not only “interpretative” communities but also in those that could be called “motor”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Versus-Quaderni di Studi Semiotici
Versus-Quaderni di Studi Semiotici HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信