A. Conteh, M. S. Kamara, S. Saidu, J. Macarthy
求助PDF
{"title":"塞拉利昂弗里敦应对Covid-19和长期排斥非正规住区居民","authors":"A. Conteh, M. S. Kamara, S. Saidu, J. Macarthy","doi":"10.19088/1968-2021.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Freetown has over 1 million residents, many of whom live in about 68 crowded informal settlements Residents of these settlements struggle daily to access basic services such as water, sanitation, and health-care services We found that the government’s Covid-19 response measures (curfews, lockdowns, and travel restrictions) excluded informal residents from contributing to its design, and the implementation of these measures prevented these residents from accessing basic services Like the urban planning processes in Freetown, the Covid-19 response planning was done with the limited inclusion of informal residents, and not considering how these response measures would affect their livelihood priorities The economic conditions of already vulnerable people such as those living with disabilities, beggars, and women heads of households worsened as a result of these measures While these challenges were dire, communities were resilient in reversing the spread of Covid-19 through tailor-made messaging and by supporting the most vulnerable with food and basic needs In this article we argue that the inclusion of the urban poor in decision-making and urban planning processes can improve service delivery and their ability to cope with health shocks © 2021 The Authors IDS Bulletin © Institute of Development Studies","PeriodicalId":47532,"journal":{"name":"Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"95-104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Covid-19 Response and Protracted Exclusion of Informal Settlement Residents in Freetown, Sierra Leone\",\"authors\":\"A. Conteh, M. S. Kamara, S. Saidu, J. Macarthy\",\"doi\":\"10.19088/1968-2021.108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Freetown has over 1 million residents, many of whom live in about 68 crowded informal settlements Residents of these settlements struggle daily to access basic services such as water, sanitation, and health-care services We found that the government’s Covid-19 response measures (curfews, lockdowns, and travel restrictions) excluded informal residents from contributing to its design, and the implementation of these measures prevented these residents from accessing basic services Like the urban planning processes in Freetown, the Covid-19 response planning was done with the limited inclusion of informal residents, and not considering how these response measures would affect their livelihood priorities The economic conditions of already vulnerable people such as those living with disabilities, beggars, and women heads of households worsened as a result of these measures While these challenges were dire, communities were resilient in reversing the spread of Covid-19 through tailor-made messaging and by supporting the most vulnerable with food and basic needs In this article we argue that the inclusion of the urban poor in decision-making and urban planning processes can improve service delivery and their ability to cope with health shocks © 2021 The Authors IDS Bulletin © Institute of Development Studies\",\"PeriodicalId\":47532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"95-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2021.108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2021.108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
引用
批量引用
Covid-19 Response and Protracted Exclusion of Informal Settlement Residents in Freetown, Sierra Leone
Freetown has over 1 million residents, many of whom live in about 68 crowded informal settlements Residents of these settlements struggle daily to access basic services such as water, sanitation, and health-care services We found that the government’s Covid-19 response measures (curfews, lockdowns, and travel restrictions) excluded informal residents from contributing to its design, and the implementation of these measures prevented these residents from accessing basic services Like the urban planning processes in Freetown, the Covid-19 response planning was done with the limited inclusion of informal residents, and not considering how these response measures would affect their livelihood priorities The economic conditions of already vulnerable people such as those living with disabilities, beggars, and women heads of households worsened as a result of these measures While these challenges were dire, communities were resilient in reversing the spread of Covid-19 through tailor-made messaging and by supporting the most vulnerable with food and basic needs In this article we argue that the inclusion of the urban poor in decision-making and urban planning processes can improve service delivery and their ability to cope with health shocks © 2021 The Authors IDS Bulletin © Institute of Development Studies